Literature DB >> 12015599

A palaeontological solution to the arthropod head problem.

Graham E Budd1.   

Abstract

The composition of the arthropod head has been one of the most controversial topics in zoology, with a large number of theories being proposed to account for it over the last century. Although fossils have been recognized as being of potential importance in resolving the issue, a lack of consensus over their systematics has obscured their contribution. Here, I show that a group of previously problematic Cambrian arthropods from the Burgess Shale and Chengjiang faunas form a clade close to crown-group euarthropods, the group containing myriapods, chelicerates, insects and crustaceans. They are characterized by modified or even absent endopods, and two pre-oral appendages. Comparison with reconstructions of the crown-group euarthropod ground plan and recent investigations into onychophorans demonstrates that these two appendages are the first antenna (of extant crustaceans) and a more anterior appendage associated with an ocular segment. The latter appendage has been reduced in all crown-group euarthropods. Its most likely relic is as a component of the labrum. These fossils thus tie together results from disparate living groups (onychophorans and euarthropods).

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12015599     DOI: 10.1038/417271a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  52 in total

1.  Head patterning and Hox gene expression in an onychophoran and its implications for the arthropod head problem.

Authors:  Bo Joakim Eriksson; Noel N Tait; Graham E Budd; Ralf Janssen; Michael Akam
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 0.900

2.  Reconstructing early sponge relationships by using the Burgess Shale fossil Eiffelia globosa, Walcott.

Authors:  Joseph P Botting; Nicholas J Butterfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The evolution of arthropod heads: reconciling morphological, developmental and palaeontological evidence.

Authors:  Gerhard Scholtz; Gregory D Edgecombe
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 0.900

4.  Historical contingency and the purported uniqueness of evolutionary innovations.

Authors:  Geerat J Vermeij
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Darwin's dilemma: the realities of the Cambrian 'explosion'.

Authors:  Simon Conway Morris
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  The earliest fossil record of the animals and its significance.

Authors:  Graham E Budd
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  The earliest history of the deuterostomes: the importance of the Chengjiang Fossil-Lagerstatte.

Authors:  D-G Shu; S Conway Morris; Z-F Zhang; J Han
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The origin and evolution of arthropods.

Authors:  Graham E Budd; Maximilian J Telford
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Arthropod visual predators in the early pelagic ecosystem: evidence from the Burgess Shale and Chengjiang biotas.

Authors:  J Vannier; D C García-Bellido; S-X Hu; A-L Chen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Anomalocaridid trunk limb homology revealed by a giant filter-feeder with paired flaps.

Authors:  Peter Van Roy; Allison C Daley; Derek E G Briggs
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.