Literature DB >> 31927629

Developmental gene expression as a phylogenetic data class: support for the monophyly of Arachnopulmonata.

Erik D Nolan1,2, Carlos E Santibáñez-López1,3, Prashant P Sharma4.   

Abstract

Despite application of genome-scale datasets, the phylogenetic placement of scorpions within arachnids remains contentious between two different phylogenetic data classes. Paleontologists continue to recover scorpions in a basally branching position, partly owing to their morphological similarity to extinct marine orders like Eurypterida (sea scorpions). Phylogenomic datasets consistently recover scorpions in a derived position, as the sister group of Tetrapulmonata (a clade of arachnids that includes spiders). To adjudicate between these hypotheses using a rare genomic change (RGC), we leveraged the recent discovery of ancient paralogy in spiders and scorpions to assess phylogenetic placement. We identified homologs of four transcription factors required for appendage patterning (dachshund, homothorax, extradenticle, and optomotor blind) in arthropods that are known to be duplicated in spiders. Using genomic resources for a spider, a scorpion, and a harvestman, we conducted gene tree analyses and assayed expression patterns of scorpion gene duplicates. Here we show that scorpions, like spiders, retain two copies of all four transcription factors, whereas arachnid orders like mites and harvestmen bear a single copy. A survey of embryonic expression patterns of the scorpion paralogs closely matches those of their spider counterparts, with one paralog consistently retaining the putatively ancestral pattern found in the harvestman, as well as the mite, and/or other outgroups. These data comprise a rare genomic change in chelicerate phylogeny supporting the inference of a distal placement of scorpions. Beyond demonstrating the diagnostic power of developmental genetic data as a phylogenetic data class, a derived placement of scorpions within the arachnids, together with an array of stem-group Paleozoic scorpions that occupied marine habitats, effectively rules out a scenario of a single colonization of terrestrial habitat within Chelicerata, even in tree topologies contrived to recover the monophyly of Arachnida.

Keywords:  Arachnida; Arthropoda; Phylogenomics; Rare genomic change

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31927629     DOI: 10.1007/s00427-019-00644-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Genes Evol        ISSN: 0949-944X            Impact factor:   0.900


  60 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Ancestral whole-genome duplication in the marine chelicerate horseshoe crabs.

Authors:  N J Kenny; K W Chan; W Nong; Z Qu; I Maeso; H Y Yip; T F Chan; H S Kwan; P W H Holland; K H Chu; J H L Hui
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Mitochondrial insertions into primate nuclear genomes suggest the use of numts as a tool for phylogeny.

Authors:  Einat Hazkani-Covo
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Phylogenomic resolution of scorpions reveals multilevel discordance with morphological phylogenetic signal.

Authors:  Prashant P Sharma; Rosa Fernández; Lauren A Esposito; Edmundo González-Santillán; Lionel Monod
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Antenna and all gnathal appendages are similarly transformed by homothorax knock-down in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus.

Authors:  Monica Ronco; Tomohiro Uda; Taro Mito; Alessandro Minelli; Sumihare Noji; Martin Klingler
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 3.582

6.  Cooption of an appendage-patterning gene cassette in the head segmentation of arachnids.

Authors:  Emily V W Setton; Prashant P Sharma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Neofunctionalization of a Duplicate dachshund Gene Underlies the Evolution of a Novel Leg Segment in Arachnids.

Authors:  Natascha Turetzek; Matthias Pechmann; Christoph Schomburg; Julia Schneider; Nikola-Michael Prpic
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Duplicated Hox genes in the spider Cupiennius salei.

Authors:  Evelyn E Schwager; Michael Schoppmeier; Matthias Pechmann; Wim G M Damen
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 3.172

9.  Pervasive microRNA Duplication in Chelicerates: Insights from the Embryonic microRNA Repertoire of the Spider Parasteatoda tepidariorum.

Authors:  Daniel J Leite; Maria Ninova; Maarten Hilbrant; Saad Arif; Sam Griffiths-Jones; Matthew Ronshaugen; Alistair P McGregor
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Draft genomic and transcriptome resources for marine chelicerate Tachypleus tridentatus.

Authors:  Yong Yan Liao; Peng Wei Xu; Kit Yue Kwan; Zhi Yun Ma; Huai Yi Fang; Jun Yang Xu; Peng Liang Wang; Shao Yu Yang; Shang Bo Xie; Shu Qing Xu; Dan Qian; Wei Feng Li; Li Rong Bai; Da Jie Zhou; Yan Qiu Zhang; Juan Lei; Ke Liu; Fan Li; Jian Li; Peng Zhu; Yu Jun Wang; Hai Ping Wu; You Hou Xu; Hu Huang; Chi Zhang; Jin Xia Liu; Jun Feng Han
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 6.444

View more
  9 in total

1.  Genomic resources and toolkits for developmental study of whip spiders (Amblypygi) provide insights into arachnid genome evolution and antenniform leg patterning.

Authors:  Guilherme Gainett; Prashant P Sharma
Journal:  Evodevo       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 2.250

Review 2.  Implications of a cheliceral axial duplication in Tetragnatha versicolor (Araneae: Tetragnathidae) for arachnid deuterocerebral appendage development.

Authors:  Darko D Cotoras; Pedro de S Castanheira; Prashant P Sharma
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 0.900

3.  Systemic paralogy and function of retinal determination network homologs in arachnids.

Authors:  Guilherme Gainett; Jesús A Ballesteros; Charlotte R Kanzler; Jakob T Zehms; John M Zern; Shlomi Aharon; Efrat Gavish-Regev; Prashant P Sharma
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  A chromosome-level genome of the spider Trichonephila antipodiana reveals the genetic basis of its polyphagy and evidence of an ancient whole-genome duplication event.

Authors:  Zheng Fan; Tao Yuan; Piao Liu; Lu-Yu Wang; Jian-Feng Jin; Feng Zhang; Zhi-Sheng Zhang
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 6.524

5.  The visual pathway in sea spiders (Pycnogonida) displays a simple serial layout with similarities to the median eye pathway in horseshoe crabs.

Authors:  Georg Brenneis
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 7.431

6.  Comprehensive Species Sampling and Sophisticated Algorithmic Approaches Refute the Monophyly of Arachnida.

Authors:  Jesús A Ballesteros; Carlos E Santibáñez-López; Caitlin M Baker; Ligia R Benavides; Tauana J Cunha; Guilherme Gainett; Andrew Z Ontano; Emily V W Setton; Claudia P Arango; Efrat Gavish-Regev; Mark S Harvey; Ward C Wheeler; Gustavo Hormiga; Gonzalo Giribet; Prashant P Sharma
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Eggs to long-legs: embryonic staging of the harvestman Phalangium opilio (Opiliones), an emerging model arachnid.

Authors:  Guilherme Gainett; Audrey R Crawford; Benjamin C Klementz; Calvin So; Caitlin M Baker; Emily V W Setton; Prashant P Sharma
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  The genome of a daddy-long-legs (Opiliones) illuminates the evolution of arachnid appendages.

Authors:  Guilherme Gainett; Vanessa L González; Jesús A Ballesteros; Emily V W Setton; Caitlin M Baker; Leonardo Barolo Gargiulo; Carlos E Santibáñez-López; Jonathan A Coddington; Prashant P Sharma
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 5.530

9.  Phylogenomic Resolution of Sea Spider Diversification through Integration of Multiple Data Classes.

Authors:  Jesús A Ballesteros; Emily V W Setton; Carlos E Santibáñez-López; Claudia P Arango; Georg Brenneis; Saskia Brix; Kevin F Corbett; Esperanza Cano-Sánchez; Merai Dandouch; Geoffrey F Dilly; Marc P Eleaume; Guilherme Gainett; Cyril Gallut; Sean McAtee; Lauren McIntyre; Amy L Moran; Randy Moran; Pablo J López-González; Gerhard Scholtz; Clay Williamson; H Arthur Woods; Jakob T Zehms; Ward C Wheeler; Prashant P Sharma
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 16.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.