Literature DB >> 25948317

A flow cytometric approach to quantify biofilms.

Monique Kerstens1, Gaëlle Boulet, Marian Van Kerckhoven, Sofie Clais, Ellen Lanckacker, Peter Delputte, Louis Maes, Paul Cos.   

Abstract

Since biofilms are important in many clinical, industrial, and environmental settings, reliable methods to quantify these sessile microbial populations are crucial. Most of the currently available techniques do not allow the enumeration of the viable cell fraction within the biofilm and are often time consuming. This paper proposes flow cytometry (FCM) using the single-stain viability dye TO-PRO(®)-3 iodide as a fast and precise alternative. Mature biofilms of Candida albicans and Escherichia coli were used to optimize biofilm removal and dissociation, as a single-cell suspension is needed for accurate FCM enumeration. To assess the feasibility of FCM quantification of biofilms, E. coli and C. albicans biofilms were analyzed using FCM and crystal violet staining at different time points. A combination of scraping and rinsing proved to be the most efficient technique for biofilm removal. Sonicating for 10 min eliminated the remaining aggregates, resulting in a single-cell suspension. Repeated FCM measurements of biofilm samples revealed a good intraday precision of approximately 5 %. FCM quantification and the crystal violet assay yielded similar biofilm growth curves for both microorganisms, confirming the applicability of our technique. These results show that FCM using TO-PRO(®)-3 iodide as a single-stain viability dye is a valid fast alternative for the quantification of viable cells in a biofilm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25948317     DOI: 10.1007/s12223-015-0400-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)        ISSN: 0015-5632            Impact factor:   2.099


  41 in total

Review 1.  Biofilms: an extra hurdle for effective antimicrobial therapy.

Authors:  P Cos; K Toté; T Horemans; L Maes
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.116

2.  Low-load compression testing: a novel way of measuring biofilm thickness.

Authors:  Ekaterina Paramonova; Ed D de Jong; Bastiaan P Krom; Henny C van der Mei; Henk J Busscher; Prashant K Sharma
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  The involvement of rhamnolipids in microbial cell adhesion and biofilm development - an approach for control?

Authors:  A Nickzad; E Déziel
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 2.858

4.  Application of quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) for the determination of the total viable count (TVC) on meat samples.

Authors:  A Dolan; C M Burgess; S Fanning; G Duffy
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 5.  Molecular detection of pathogens in water--the pros and cons of molecular techniques.

Authors:  Rosina Girones; Maria Antonia Ferrús; José Luis Alonso; Jesus Rodriguez-Manzano; Byron Calgua; Adriana de Abreu Corrêa; Ayalkibet Hundesa; Anna Carratala; Sílvia Bofill-Mas
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 11.236

6.  Ability of Candida albicans mutants to induce Staphylococcus aureus vancomycin resistance during polymicrobial biofilm formation.

Authors:  Melphine M Harriott; Mairi C Noverr
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms with higher proportions of dormant bacteria induce a lower activation of murine macrophages.

Authors:  Filipe Cerca; Filipa Andrade; Ângela França; Elva Bonifácio Andrade; Adília Ribeiro; Agostinho A Almeida; Nuno Cerca; Gerald Pier; Joana Azeredo; Manuel Vilanova
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 2.472

Review 8.  Quantitative analysis of multi-species oral biofilms by TaqMan Real-Time PCR.

Authors:  Nao Suzuki; Akihiro Yoshida; Yoshio Nakano
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2005-08

9.  Measurement of thyroxine and cortisol in canine and feline blood samples using two immunoassay analysers.

Authors:  P Higgs; M Costa; A Freke; K Papasouliotis
Journal:  J Small Anim Pract       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 1.522

10.  A method for quantitative determination of biofilm viability.

Authors:  Ken Welch; Yanling Cai; Maria Strømme
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2012-06-01
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Pathogens electrogenicity as a tool for in-situ metabolic activity monitoring and drug assessment in biofilms.

Authors:  Waheed Miran; Divya Naradasu; Akihiro Okamoto
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-01-19

2.  Improving saliva shotgun metagenomics by chemical host DNA depletion.

Authors:  Clarisse A Marotz; Jon G Sanders; Cristal Zuniga; Livia S Zaramela; Rob Knight; Karsten Zengler
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 14.650

3.  Biofilm-Forming Ability of Microbacterium lacticum and Staphylococcus capitis Considering Physicochemical and Topographical Surface Properties.

Authors:  Elena Zand; Hedwig Pfanner; Konrad J Domig; Gerhard Sinn; Marija Zunabovic-Pichler; Henry Jaeger
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-03-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.