Literature DB >> 25947086

Visual illusions in predator-prey interactions: birds find moving patterned prey harder to catch.

Liisa Hämäläinen1, Janne Valkonen, Johanna Mappes, Bibiana Rojas.   

Abstract

Several antipredator strategies are related to prey colouration. Some colour patterns can create visual illusions during movement (such as motion dazzle), making it difficult for a predator to capture moving prey successfully. Experimental evidence about motion dazzle, however, is still very scarce and comes only from studies using human predators capturing moving prey items in computer games. We tested a motion dazzle effect using for the first time natural predators (wild great tits, Parus major). We used artificial prey items bearing three different colour patterns: uniform brown (control), black with elongated yellow pattern and black with interrupted yellow pattern. The last two resembled colour patterns of the aposematic, polymorphic dart-poison frog Dendrobates tinctorius. We specifically tested whether an elongated colour pattern could create visual illusions when combined with straight movement. Our results, however, do not support this hypothesis. We found no differences in the number of successful attacks towards prey items with different patterns (elongated/interrupted) moving linearly. Nevertheless, both prey types were significantly more difficult to catch compared to the uniform brown prey, indicating that both colour patterns could provide some benefit for a moving individual. Surprisingly, no effect of background (complex vs. plain) was found. This is the first experiment with moving prey showing that some colour patterns can affect avian predators' ability to capture moving prey, but the mechanisms lowering the capture rate are still poorly understood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25947086     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-015-0874-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  9 in total

1.  Diverted by dazzle: perceived movement direction is biased by target pattern orientation.

Authors:  Anna E Hughes; Christian Jones; Kaustuv Joshi; David J Tolhurst
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  The current and future state of animal coloration research.

Authors:  John A Endler; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  In the corner of the eye: camouflaging motion in the peripheral visual field.

Authors:  Ioan E Smart; Innes C Cuthill; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Distance-dependent defensive coloration in the poison frog Dendrobates tinctorius, Dendrobatidae.

Authors:  James B Barnett; Constantine Michalis; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Variation in activity rates may explain sex-specific dorsal color patterns in Habronattus jumping spiders.

Authors:  Lisa A Taylor; Collette Cook; Kevin J McGraw
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Motion: enhancing signals and concealing cues.

Authors:  Eunice J Tan; Mark A Elgar
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 2.422

7.  Do bovids evolve hindquarter markings for anti-predation?

Authors:  Cong Yu; Lixin Chen; Sihan Ning; Sana Ullah; Zhongqiu Li
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 2.624

8.  Deceived by stripes: conspicuous patterning on vital anterior body parts can redirect predatory strikes to expendable posterior organs.

Authors:  Gopal Murali; Ullasa Kodandaramaiah
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Dazzle camouflage, target tracking, and the confusion effect.

Authors:  Benedict G Hogan; Innes C Cuthill; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 2.671

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.