Lisa I Iezzoni1, Amy J Wint2, Suzanne C Smeltzer3, Jeffrey L Ecker4. 1. Mongan Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, USA. Electronic address: liezzoni@mgh.harvard.org. 2. Mongan Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA. 3. Center for Nursing Research, Villanova University College of Nursing, USA. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harvard Medical School, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known about current societal attitudes toward women with significant mobility disability who are visibly pregnant. OBJECTIVE: To use qualitative descriptive analysis methods to examine perceptions of women with significant mobility disability about how strangers reacted to their visible pregnancies. METHODS: In late 2013, we conducted 2-h telephone interviews with 22 women with significant mobility difficulties who had delivered babies within the prior 10 years. The semi-structured, open-ended interview protocol addressed wide-ranging pregnancy-related topics, including statements from strangers. Most participants were recruited through social networks, coming from 17 states nationwide. We used NVivo to sort the texts for content analysis. RESULTS: The women's mean (standard deviation) age was 34.8 (5.3) years; most were white, well-educated, and higher income, although half had Medicaid during their pregnancies; and 18 used wheeled mobility aids. Eighteen women described memorable interactions with strangers relating to their pregnancies or newborn babies. Strangers' statements fell into six categories: (1) curious; (2) intrusively and persistently curious; (3) hostile, including concerns that taxpayers would end up supporting the mother and child; (4) questioning woman's competence as a potential parent; (5) oblivious, not recognizing visible pregnancy or motherhood; and (6) positive. Many women reported strangers asking how their pregnancy had happened. The women doubted that visibly pregnant women without disabilities evoke the same reactions from strangers. CONCLUSIONS: Women with mobility disability who are visibly pregnant may perceive reactions from strangers that appear intrusive. Planning ahead for handling such encounters could reduce the stresses of these interactions.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about current societal attitudes toward women with significant mobility disability who are visibly pregnant. OBJECTIVE: To use qualitative descriptive analysis methods to examine perceptions of women with significant mobility disability about how strangers reacted to their visible pregnancies. METHODS: In late 2013, we conducted 2-h telephone interviews with 22 women with significant mobility difficulties who had delivered babies within the prior 10 years. The semi-structured, open-ended interview protocol addressed wide-ranging pregnancy-related topics, including statements from strangers. Most participants were recruited through social networks, coming from 17 states nationwide. We used NVivo to sort the texts for content analysis. RESULTS: The women's mean (standard deviation) age was 34.8 (5.3) years; most were white, well-educated, and higher income, although half had Medicaid during their pregnancies; and 18 used wheeled mobility aids. Eighteen women described memorable interactions with strangers relating to their pregnancies or newborn babies. Strangers' statements fell into six categories: (1) curious; (2) intrusively and persistently curious; (3) hostile, including concerns that taxpayers would end up supporting the mother and child; (4) questioning woman's competence as a potential parent; (5) oblivious, not recognizing visible pregnancy or motherhood; and (6) positive. Many women reported strangers asking how their pregnancy had happened. The women doubted that visibly pregnant women without disabilities evoke the same reactions from strangers. CONCLUSIONS:Women with mobility disability who are visibly pregnant may perceive reactions from strangers that appear intrusive. Planning ahead for handling such encounters could reduce the stresses of these interactions.
Authors: Monika Mitra; Lisa I Iezzoni; Jianying Zhang; Linda M Long-Bellil; Suzanne C Smeltzer; Bruce A Barton Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2015-02
Authors: Courtney S Streur; Christine L Schafer; Valerie P Garcia; Elisabeth H Quint; David E Sandberg; Claire Z Kalpakjian; Daniela A Wittmann Journal: Disabil Health J Date: 2019-06-15 Impact factor: 2.554
Authors: Claire Z Kalpakjian; Jodi M Kreschmer; Mary D Slavin; Pamela A Kisala; Elisabeth H Quint; Nancy D Chiaravalloti; Natalie Jenkins; Tamara Bushnik; Dagmar Amtmann; David S Tulsky; Roxanne Madrid; Rebecca Parten; Michael Evitts; Carolyn L Grawi Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Michelle Huezo García; Samantha E Parker; Julie M Petersen; Eric Rubenstein; Martha M Werler Journal: Disabil Health J Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 2.554