Literature DB >> 16817194

Noninvasive cortical stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation in Parkinson's disease.

Felipe Fregni1, Paulo S Boggio, Marcelo C Santos, Moises Lima, Adriana L Vieira, Sergio P Rigonatti, M Teresa A Silva, Egberto R Barbosa, Michael A Nitsche, Alvaro Pascual-Leone.   

Abstract

Electrical stimulation of deep brain structures, such as globus pallidus and subthalamic nucleus, is widely accepted as a therapeutic tool for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Cortical stimulation either with epidural implanted electrodes or repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation can be associated with motor function enhancement in PD. We aimed to study the effects of another noninvasive technique of cortical brain stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), on motor function and motor-evoked potential (MEP) characteristics of PD patients. We tested tDCS using different electrode montages [anodal stimulation of primary motor cortex (M1), cathodal stimulation of M1, anodal stimulation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and sham-stimulation] and evaluated the effects on motor function--as indexed by Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), simple reaction time (sRT) and Purdue Pegboard test--and on corticospinal motor excitability (MEP characteristics). All experiments were performed in a double-blinded manner. Anodal stimulation of M1 was associated with a significant improvement of motor function compared to sham-stimulation in the UPDRS (P < 0.001) and sRT (P = 0.019). This effect was not observed for cathodal stimulation of M1 or anodal stimulation of DLPFC. Furthermore, whereas anodal stimulation of M1 significantly increased MEP amplitude and area, cathodal stimulation of M1 significantly decreased them. There was a trend toward a significant correlation between motor function improvement after M1 anodal-tDCS and MEP area increase. These results confirm and extend the notion that cortical brain stimulation might improve motor function in patients with PD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16817194     DOI: 10.1002/mds.21012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mov Disord        ISSN: 0885-3185            Impact factor:   10.338


  117 in total

Review 1.  tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review.

Authors:  Liron Jacobson; Meni Koslowsky; Michal Lavidor
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of anodal tDCS of the lower limb M1 on ankle reaction time in young adults.

Authors:  Daya Devanathan; Sangeetha Madhavan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of default mode network parietal nodes decreases negative mind-wandering about the past.

Authors:  Tina Chou; Jill M Hooley; Joan A Camprodon
Journal:  Cognit Ther Res       Date:  2019-09-28

4.  Augmenting cognitive training in older adults (The ACT Study): Design and Methods of a Phase III tDCS and cognitive training trial.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; Ronald Cohen; Michael Marsiske; Gene E Alexander; Sara J Czaja; Samuel Wu
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  David H Benninger; Mikhail Lomarev; Grisel Lopez; Eric M Wassermann; Xiaobai Li; Elaine Considine; Mark Hallett
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  The effect of tissue anisotropy on the radial and tangential components of the electric field in transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Mohamed K Metwally; Seung Moo Han; Tae-Seong Kim
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 7.  Current Status of Neuromodulatory Therapies for Disorders of Consciousness.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Xia; Yi Yang; Yongkun Guo; Yang Bai; Yuanyuan Dang; Ruxiang Xu; Jianghong He
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 5.203

8.  It takes two: noninvasive brain stimulation combined with neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Stephen J Page; David A Cunningham; Ela Plow; Brittani Blazak
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 9.  Synaptic plasticity in neurodegenerative diseases evaluated and modulated by in vivo neurophysiological techniques.

Authors:  F Pilato; P Profice; F Ranieri; F Capone; R Di Iorio; L Florio; V Di Lazzaro
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 10.  Treatments in context: transcranial direct current brain stimulation as a potential treatment in pediatric psychosis.

Authors:  Christopher N David; Judith L Rapoport; Nitin Gogtay
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.618

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.