Literature DB >> 27542967

Is age a prognostic biomarker for survival among women with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiation? An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group ancillary data analysis.

Kathleen N Moore1, James J Java2, Katrina N Slaughter3, Peter G Rose4, Rachelle Lanciano5, Paul A DiSilvestro6, J Tate Thigpen7, Yi-Chun Lee8, Krishnansu S Tewari9, Junzo Chino10, Shelly M Seward11, David S Miller12, Ritu Salani13, David H Moore14, Frederick B Stehman15.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of age on completion of and toxicities following treatment of local regionally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) on Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) Phase I-III trials.
METHODS: An ancillary data analysis of GOG protocols 113, 120, 165, 219 data was performed. Wilcoxon, Pearson, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for univariate and multivariate analysis. Log rank tests were used to compare survival lengths.
RESULTS: One-thousand-three-hundred-nineteen women were included; 60.7% were Caucasian, 15% were age 60-70years and an additional 5% were >70; 87% had squamous histology, 55% had stage IIB disease and 34% had IIIB disease. Performance status declined with age (p=0.006). Histology and tumor stage did not significantly differ. Number of cycles of chemotherapy received, radiation treatment time, nor dose modifications varied with age. Notably, radiation protocol deviations and failure to complete brachytherapy (BT) did increase with age (p=0.022 and p<0.001 respectively). Only all grade lymphatic (p=0.006) and grade≥3 cardiovascular toxicities (p=0.019) were found to vary with age. A 2% increase in the risk of death for every year increase >50 for all-cause mortality (HR 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04) was found, but no association between age and disease specific mortality was found.
CONCLUSION: This represents a large analysis of patients treated for LACC with chemo/radiation, approximately 20% of whom were >60years of age. Older patients, had higher rates of incomplete brachytherapy which is not explained by collected toxicity data. Age did not adversely impact completion of chemotherapy and radiation or toxicities.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarkers; Cervical cancer; Chemoradiation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27542967      PMCID: PMC5693242          DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.08.317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  16 in total

1.  Assessment of mediators of racial disparities in cervical cancer survival in the United States.

Authors:  Candace S Sheppard; Mariam El-Zein; Agnihotram V Ramanakumar; Alex Ferenczy; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Age is not a limiting factor for radical radiotherapy in pelvic malignancies.

Authors:  T Pignon; J C Horiot; M Bolla; H van Poppel; H Bartelink; F Roelofsen; F Pene; A Gerard; N Einhorn; T D Nguyen; M Vanglabbeke; P Scalliet
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Patterns of care and treatment outcomes for elderly women with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Charu Sharma; Israel Deutsch; David P Horowitz; Dawn L Hershman; Sharyn N Lewin; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Thomas J Herzog; Clifford K Chao; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  P G Rose; B N Bundy; E B Watkins; J T Thigpen; G Deppe; M A Maiman; D L Clarke-Pearson; S Insalaco
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Definitive chemoradiotherapy for advanced cervical cancer: should it be different in the elderly?

Authors:  Inacelli Queiroz de Souza Caires; Karla Teixeira Souza; Marcelo Vailati Negrão; Julia Andrade de Oliveira; Romualdo Barroso-Sousa; Rafael Caires Alvino de Lima; Paulo Marcelo Gehm Hoff; Maria del Pilar Estevez Diz
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.435

6.  Phase III randomized trial of weekly cisplatin and irradiation versus cisplatin and tirapazamine and irradiation in stages IB2, IIA, IIB, IIIB, and IVA cervical carcinoma limited to the pelvis: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Paul A DiSilvestro; Shamshad Ali; Peter S Craighead; Joseph A Lucci; Yi-Chun Lee; David E Cohn; Nicola M Spirtos; Krishnasu S Tewari; Carolyn Muller; Walter H Gajewski; Margaret M Steinhoff; Bradley J Monk
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Hydroxyurea, 5-fluorouracil infusion, and cisplatin adjunct to radiation therapy in cervical carcinoma: a phase I-II trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group.

Authors:  F B Stehman; B N Bundy; P R Kucera; G Deppe; S Reddy; D M O'Connor
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Randomized comparison of weekly cisplatin or protracted venous infusion of fluorouracil in combination with pelvic radiation in advanced cervix cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study.

Authors:  Rachelle Lanciano; Alison Calkins; Brian N Bundy; Groesbeck Parham; Joseph A Lucci; David H Moore; Bradley J Monk; Dennis M O'Connor
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-17       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Is endometrial carcinoma intrinsically more aggressive in elderly patients?

Authors:  Kaled M Alektiar; Ennapadam Venkatraman; Nadeem Abu-Rustum; Richard R Barakat
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Retrospective analysis of concomitant Cisplatin during radiation in patients aged 55 years or older for treatment of advanced cervical cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study.

Authors:  Charles Kunos; Chunqiao Tian; Steven Waggoner; Peter G Rose; Rachelle Lanciano
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.437

View more
  15 in total

1.  External validation of a combined PET and MRI radiomics model for prediction of recurrence in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  François Lucia; Dimitris Visvikis; Martin Vallières; Marie-Charlotte Desseroit; Omar Miranda; Philippe Robin; Pietro Andrea Bonaffini; Joanne Alfieri; Ingrid Masson; Augustin Mervoyer; Caroline Reinhold; Olivier Pradier; Mathieu Hatt; Ulrike Schick
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Prediction of outcome using pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI radiomics in locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  François Lucia; Dimitris Visvikis; Marie-Charlotte Desseroit; Omar Miranda; Jean-Pierre Malhaire; Philippe Robin; Olivier Pradier; Mathieu Hatt; Ulrike Schick
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Patient-reported outcomes at discontinuation of anti-angiogenesis therapy in the randomized trial of chemotherapy with bevacizumab for advanced cervical cancer: an NRG Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Dana Chase; Helen Q Huang; Bradley J Monk; Lois Michelle Ramondetta; Richard T Penson; Karen Gil; Lisa M Landrum; Mario Leitao; Ana Oaknin; Warner K Huh; Heather L Pulaski; Katina Robison; Saketh R Guntupalli; Debra Richardson; Ritu Salani; Michael W Sill; Lari B Wenzel; Krishnansu Sujata Tewari
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 4.  Too many women are dying from cervix cancer: Problems and solutions.

Authors:  David K Gaffney; Mia Hashibe; Deanna Kepka; Kathryn A Maurer; Theresa L Werner
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Increasing age predicts poor cervical cancer prognosis with subsequent effect on treatment and overall survival.

Authors:  Bridget A Quinn; Xiaoyan Deng; Adrianne Colton; Dipankar Bandyopadhyay; Jori S Carter; Emma C Fields
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Monocytosis as a prognostic factor for survival in stage IB and IIA cervical cancer.

Authors:  Wan Kyu Eo; Byung Su Kwon; Ki Hyung Kim; Heung Yeol Kim; Hong-Bae Kim; Suk Bong Koh; Sungwook Chun; Yong Il Ji; Ji Young Lee; Jeong Namkung; Sanghoon Kwon
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 7.  Practical brachytherapy solutions to an age-old quandary.

Authors:  N Thiruthaneeswaran; H Tharmalingam; P J Hoskin
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-10-26

8.  From IB2 to IIIB locally advanced cervical cancers: report of a ten-year experience.

Authors:  Sophie Espenel; Max-Adrien Garcia; Jane-Chloé Trone; Elodie Guillaume; Annabelle Harris; Amel Rehailia-Blanchard; Ming Yuan He; Sarra Ouni; Alexis Vallard; Chloé Rancoule; Majed Ben Mrad; Céline Chauleur; Guy De Laroche; Jean-Baptiste Guy; Pablo Moreno-Acosta; Nicolas Magné
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Postoperative chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for elderly cervical cancer patients with positive margins, lymph nodes, or parametrial invasion.

Authors:  Taylor R Cushman; Waqar Haque; Hari Menon; Chad G Rusthoven; E Brian Butler; Bin S Teh; Vivek Verma
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.401

10.  Association of MRI-derived radiomic biomarker with disease-free survival in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jin Fang; Bin Zhang; Shuo Wang; Yan Jin; Fei Wang; Yingying Ding; Qiuying Chen; Liting Chen; Yueyue Li; Minmin Li; Zhuozhi Chen; Lizhi Liu; Zhenyu Liu; Jie Tian; Shuixing Zhang
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 11.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.