Literature DB >> 31708653

Cost-effectiveness analysis of selective first-line use of biologics for unresectable RAS wild-type left-sided metastatic colorectal cancer.

W W L Wong1, M Zargar1, S R Berry2, Y J Ko3, M Riesco-Martínez4, K K W Chan3,5.   

Abstract

Background: Evidence from a retrospective analysis of multiple large phase iii trials suggested that primary tumour location (ptl) in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (wtRAS mcrc) might have predictive value with respect to response to drug therapies. Recent studies also show a potential preferential benefit for epidermal growth factor inhibitors (egfris) for left-sided tumours. In the present study, we aimed to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (icer) for the first-line use of an egfri for patients with left-sided wtRAS mcrc.
Methods: We developed a state-transition model to determine the cost effectiveness of alternative treatment strategies in patients with left-sided mcrc:■ Standard of care■ Use of an egfri in first-line therapyThe cohort for the study consisted of patients diagnosed with unresectable wtRAS mcrc with an indication for chemotherapy and previously documented ptl. Model parameters were obtained from the published literature and calibration. The perspective was that of a provincial ministry of health in Canada. We used a 5-year time horizon and an annual discount rate of 1.5%.
Results: Selecting patients for first-line egfri treatment based on left-sided location of their colorectal primary tumour was more effective than the standard of care, resulting in an increase in quality-adjusted life-years (qalys) of 0.226 (or 0.644 life-years gained). However, the strategy was also more expensive, costing an average of $60,639 more per patient treated. The resulting icer was $268,094 per qaly. A 35% price reduction in the cost of egfri would be needed to make this strategy cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold (wtp) of $100,000 per qaly. Conclusions: Selective use of an egfri based on ptl was more cost-effective than unselected use of those agents; however, based on traditional wtp thresholds, it was still not cost-effective. While awaiting the elucidation of more precise predictive biomarkers that might improve cost-effectiveness, the price of egfris could be reduced to meet the wtp threshold. 2019 Multimed Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost-effectiveness analyses; EGFR inhibitors; RAS wild-type; colorectal cancer; metastatic; primary tumour location

Year:  2019        PMID: 31708653      PMCID: PMC6821119          DOI: 10.3747/co.26.4843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  54 in total

1.  Effect of First-Line Chemotherapy Combined With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab on Overall Survival in Patients With KRAS Wild-Type Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Alan P Venook; Donna Niedzwiecki; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Federico Innocenti; Briant Fruth; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Deborah Schrag; Claire Greene; Bert H O'Neil; James Norman Atkins; Scott Berry; Blase N Polite; Eileen M O'Reilly; Richard M Goldberg; Howard S Hochster; Richard L Schilsky; Monica M Bertagnolli; Anthony B El-Khoueiry; Peter Watson; Al B Benson; Daniel L Mulkerin; Robert J Mayer; Charles Blanke
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Updating the American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework: Revisions and Reflections in Response to Comments Received.

Authors:  Lowell E Schnipper; Nancy E Davidson; Dana S Wollins; Douglas W Blayney; Adam P Dicker; Patricia A Ganz; J Russell Hoverman; Robert Langdon; Gary H Lyman; Neal J Meropol; Therese Mulvey; Lee Newcomer; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Blase Polite; Derek Raghavan; Gregory Rossi; Leonard Saltz; Deborah Schrag; Thomas J Smith; Peter P Yu; Clifford A Hudis; Julie M Vose; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Patterns of Chemotherapy and Biologic Therapy Use in US Medical Oncology Practice.

Authors:  Gregory P Hess; Peter Feng Wang; David Quach; Beth Barber; Zhongyun Zhao
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Prospective cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluation of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group CO.17 trial.

Authors:  Nicole Mittmann; Heather-Jane Au; Dongsheng Tu; Christopher J O'Callaghan; Pierre K Isogai; Christos S Karapetis; John R Zalcberg; William K Evans; Malcolm J Moore; Jehan Siddiqui; Brian Findlay; Bruce Colwell; John Simes; Peter Gibbs; Matthew Links; Niall C Tebbutt; Derek J Jonker
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  The relevance of primary tumour location in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of first-line clinical trials.

Authors:  Julian Walter Holch; Ingrid Ricard; Sebastian Stintzing; Dominik Paul Modest; Volker Heinemann
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Chemotherapy usage patterns in a US-wide cohort of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Thomas A Abrams; Gary Meyer; Deborah Schrag; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Julie Moloney; Charles S Fuchs
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Risk of gastrointestinal perforation in patients with cancer treated with bevacizumab: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sanjaykumar Hapani; David Chu; Shenhong Wu
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 8.  Risk of venous thromboembolism with the angiogenesis inhibitor bevacizumab in cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shobha Rani Nalluri; David Chu; Roger Keresztes; Xiaolei Zhu; Shenhong Wu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Right-sided colon cancer and left-sided colorectal cancers respond differently to cetuximab.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Long Bai; Tian-Shu Liu; Yi-Yi Yu; Ming-Ming He; Kai-Yan Liu; Hui-Yan Luo; Dong-Sheng Zhang; Yin Jin; Feng-Hua Wang; Zhi-Qiang Wang; De-Shen Wang; Miao-Zhen Qiu; Chao Ren; Yu-Hong Li; Rui-Hua Xu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2015-06-10

10.  Economic evaluation study (CHEER-compliant): Cost-effectiveness analysis of RAS screening for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer based on the CALGB 80405 trial.

Authors:  Jing Zhou; Rongce Zhao; Feng Wen; Pengfei Zhang; Ruilei Tang; Hongdou Chen; Jian Zhang; Qiu Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cost-Effectiveness of Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Therapy Versus Bevacizumab in KRAS Wild-Type (WT), Pan-RAS WT, and Pan-RAS WT Left-Sided Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Shing Fung Lee; Horace C W Choi; Sik Kwan Chan; Ka On Lam; Victor H F Lee; Irene O L Wong; Chi Leung Chiang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 6.244

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.