| Literature DB >> 28767656 |
Magdalena Lipczyńska1, Piotr Szymański2, Magdalena Kumor1, Anna Klisiewicz1, Piotr Hoffman1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Myocardial fibrosis is a potential pathophysiological mechanism leading to systemic right ventricular (SRV) deterioration. We hypothesize that circulating levels of collagen deposition markers are elevated in patients with SRV remodeling and this elevation may have a predictive value.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28767656 PMCID: PMC5540554 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180629
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Baseline characteristics of the studied group.
| D-TGA (n = 56) | |
|---|---|
| 25.6 ± 4.8 | |
| 37 (67) | |
| 56 (100) | |
| 29.2 ± 2.5 | |
| 46 (82)/10 (18) | |
| I | 44 (79) |
| II | 11 (20) |
| III | 1 (0.5) |
| TAPSE, mm | 13.3 ± 2.7 |
| SRV s’, cm/s | 9.1 ± 2.2 |
| SRV FAC, % | 31.5 ± 7.7 |
| SRV GLS, % | 15.4 ± 2.8 |
| SRV EF, % | 48.0 ± 9.7 |
| SRV mass index, g/m² | 38.5 ± 14.7 |
| SRVEDV index, ml/m² | 125.2 ± 32.8 |
| SRV LGE positive, n % | 4 (10) |
*CMR was performed on 41 patients.
NYHA—New York Heart Association, TAPSE—tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, SRV—systemic right ventricle, FAC—fractional area change, GLS—global longitudinal strain, CMR—cardiac magnetic resonance, EF—ejection fraction, EDV—end diastolic volume, LGE—late gadolinium enhancement.
Comparison of biochemical markers between the studied group and healthy controls.
| D-TGA patients | Healthy controls | P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 202.9 ± 37.2 | 214.7 ± 14.1 | 0.1 | |
| 463.3 ± 263.3 | 403.9 ± 244.5 | 0.3 | |
| 153.3 ± 36.5 | 135.1 ± 34.2 | 0.03 | |
| 4.8 ± 1.5 | 3.3 ± 0.5 | < 0.0001 | |
| 4.0 ± 1.4 | 3.1 ± 1.1 | 0.007 | |
| 62.5 ± 28.5 | 50.3 ± 12.9 | 0.03 | |
| 176.5 (IQR 198.3) | 42.7 (IQR 56.6) | 0.0001 | |
| 141.5 (IQR 89.5) | 198.5 (IQR 211.65) | 0.1 |
MMP- matrix metalloproteinase, TIMP- tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase, PIIINP—procollagen type III amino-terminal propeptide, CITP—collagen type I carboxy-terminal telopeptide, PINP—procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide, NT-pro-BNP—N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide.
* P value for Mann-Whitney nonparametric test.
** Median (Interquartile Range, IQR) for non-normally distributed data.
Fig 1Relationship between PIIINP levels and SVR function and remodeling parameters.
(A) Correlation between PIIINP and SRV GLS (r = 0.31, p = 0.01), (B) correlation between PIIINP and SRV mass index (r = 0.38, p = 0.02), (C) correlation between PIIINP and SRV EDV index (r = 0.42, p = 0.008).
Univariate predictors of adverse clinical events.
| Variable | Hazard ratio (95% CI) | P value |
|---|---|---|
| (ln) NT-pro-BNP | 1.001 (1.00–1.001) | 0.23 |
| (ln) aldosterone | 1.00 (0.99–1.002) | 0.83 |
| MMP2 | 1.003 (0.99–1.01) | 0.63 |
| MMP9 | 1.004 (1.001–1.006) | 0.01 |
| TIMP1 | 1.02 (1.005–1.035) | 0.008 |
| PIIINP | 1.12 (0.79–1.58) | 0.52 |
| CITP | 1.28 (0.87–1.88) | 0.19 |
| PINP | 0.99 (0.97–1.01) | 0.86 |
| SRV EF | 0.90 (0.83–0.97) | 0.007 |
| SRV LGE positive | 1.19 (0.24–5.83) | 0.83 |
| SRV GLS | 1.14 (0.92–1.41) | 0.21 |
| Age | 0.98 (0.88–1.11) | 0.85 |
| Age at operation | 0.93 (0.73–1.19) | 0.57 |
| NYHA class ≥ 2 | 0.13 (0.04–0.39) | 0.001 |
MMP- matrix metalloproteinase, TIMP- tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase, PIIINP—procollagen type III amino-terminal propeptide, CITP—collagen type I carboxy-terminal telopeptide, PINP—procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide, NT-pro-BNP—N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, CMR—cardiac magnetic resonance, SRV—systemic right ventricle, EF—ejection fraction, LGE—late gadolinium enhancement, GLS—global longitudinal strain, NYHA—New York Heart Association, ln—natural logarithm.