| Literature DB >> 25935152 |
Zhenkai Wu1, Dahang Zhao2, Li Zhao3, Jianlin Liu4, Hai Li5, Jie Zhu6, Fengcang Ma7, Daniel Edward Porter8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the animal study is to introduce a newly designed hinged plate and screw system for correction of angular deformities of the lower limbs. The technique was compared with the use of a conventional tension-band plate and screw system.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25935152 PMCID: PMC4419467 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-015-0198-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Figure 1The newly designed hinged plate and screw system. (A) The plate has a hinge and two arms and two 2 mm diameter screws. (B) Maximal angle of the two arms. (C) Minimal angle of the two arms.
Figure 2Sketch map of hemiepiphysiodesis. (A) The hinged plate almost completely matches the contour of the bone. (B) The straight conventional plate does not match the bone surface.
Figure 3Intraoperative photos. (A) A hinged plate and screw system is implanted. (B) No obvious prominence observed after wound closure.
Figure 4Measurements on standard anterioposterior radiograph of the knee joint. MSA, medial slope angle; MPTA, medial proximal tibial angle; and ATA, angle of the two arms.
Figure 5Standard anterioposterior radiographs of the tibia. (A) Immediately after correction with a hinged plate and screw system. (B) Eighteen weeks after operation. (C) Immediately after correction with a conventional plate and screw system. (D) Eighteen weeks after operation.
Demographics and measurement values of study group
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 | L | 20 | 88 | −20 | 25 | 85 | −14 | 29 | 81 | 12 | 32 | 80 | 26 | 813.9 |
| 2 | R | 26 | 89 | −12 | 27 | 87 | 5 | 29 | 77 | 22 | 31 | 67 | 32 | 681.9 |
| 3 | L | 22 | 93 | −4 | 25 | 91 | 12 | 36 | 80 | 24 | 40 | 71 | 30 | 718.7 |
| 4 | L | 24 | 90 | −4 | 25 | 90 | 6 | 27 | 85 | 15 | 33 | 81 | 26 | 465.9 |
| 5 | R | 22 | 90 | −13 | 28 | 90 | −2 | 34 | 85 | 20 | 40 | 76 | 34 | 415.9 |
| 6 | R | 22 | 98 | 0 | 22 | 95 | 7 | 24 | 86 | 28 | 33 | 75 | 31 | 703.9 |
| 7 | R | 21 | 94 | −12 | 23 | 90 | 8 | 30 | 85 | 18 | 33 | 78 | 31 | 678.5 |
| 8 | L | 22 | 85 | −5 | 24 | 81 | 11 | 29 | 81 | 19 | 31 | 76 | 33 | 668.1 |
| Mean | 22 | 91 | −9 | 25 | 89 | 4 | 30 | 83 | 20 | 34 | 76 | 30 | 643.35 | |
ATA, angle of the two arms; MPTA, medial proximal tibial angle; MSA, medial slope angle; RS, residual stress.
Figure 6Images of histological sections. The bluish green area shows periosteal and perichondral (Safranin-O/fast green stain; ×40). (A) A section obtained from the tibia of a 3-month-old Bama miniature pig. The pig used for comparison did not have an operation. (B) The periosteal and perichondral beneath the hinged plate are intact after 18 weeks. (C) The periosteal and perichondral beneath the conventional tension-band plate are almost vanished after 18 weeks.
Demographics and measurement values of control group
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 | R | 21 | 91 | −1 | 26 | 84 | 17 | 32 | 77 | 29 | 35 | 72 | 32 | 1,441.2 |
| 2 | L | 13 | 85 | 0 | 22 | 83 | 4 | 23 | 80 | 22 | 28 | 75 | 33 | 1,318.7 |
| 3 | R | 23 | 89 | −17 | 29 | 89 | 6 | 37 | 84 | 27 | 37 | 79 | 33 | 1,450.9 |
| 4 | R | 20 | 89 | −1 | 25 | 88 | 4 | 30 | 86 | 14 | 40 | 83 | 30 | 1,765.5 |
| 5 | L | 20 | 89 | −8 | 31 | 82 | 19 | 37 | 79 | 26 | 41 | 71 | 32 | 651.4 |
| 6 | L | 22 | 97 | −1 | 31 | 91 | 15 | 34 | 80 | 31 | 30 | 65 | 33 | 1,235.1 |
| 7 | L | 20 | 94 | −11 | 29 | 90 | 15 | 31 | 85 | 25 | 38 | 78 | 33 | 800.2 |
| 8 | R | 24 | 87 | −18 | 29 | 85 | 4 | 32 | 85 | 12 | 35 | 69 | 25 | 1,526 |
| Mean | 21 | 90 | −7 | 28 | 87 | 10 | 32 | 82 | 23 | 36 | 74 | 31 | 1,273.63 | |
ATA, angle of the two arms; MPTA, medial proximal tibial angle; MSA, medial slope angle; RS, residual stress.