Literature DB >> 25934985

Integration of Pig-a, micronucleus, chromosome aberration and comet assay endpoints in a 28-day rodent toxicity study with urethane.

Leon F Stankowski1, Marilyn J Aardema2, Timothy E Lawlor3, Kamala Pant3, Shambhu Roy3, Yong Xu3, Reem Elbekai3.   

Abstract

As part of the international Pig-a validation trials, we examined the induction of Pig-a mutant reticulocytes and red blood cells (RET(CD59-) and RBC(CD59-), respectively) in peripheral blood of male Sprague Dawley(®) rats treated with urethane (25, 100 and 250mg/kg/day) or saline by oral gavage for 29 days. Additional endpoints integrated into this study were: micronucleated reticulocytes (MN-RET) in peripheral blood; chromosome aberrations (CAb) and DNA damage (%tail intensity via the comet assay) in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL); micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (MN-PCE) in bone marrow; and DNA damage (comet) in various organs at termination (the 29th dose was added for the comet endpoint at sacrifice). Ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS; 200mg/kg/day on Days 3, 4, 13, 14, 15, 27, 28 and 29) was evaluated as the concurrent positive control (PC). All animals survived to termination and none exhibited overt toxicity, but there were significant differences in body weight and body weight gain in the 250-mg/kg/day urethane group, as compared with the saline control animals. Statistically significant, dose-dependent increases were observed for urethane for: RET(CD59-) and RBC(CD59-) (on Days 15 and 29); MN-RET (on Days 4, 15 and 29); and MN-PCE (on Day 29). The comet assay yielded positive results in PBL (Day 15) and liver (Day 29), but negative results for PBL (Days 4 and 29) and brain, kidney and lung (Day 29). No significant increases in PBL CAb were observed at any sample time. Except for PBL CAb (likely due to excessive cytotoxicity), EMS-induced significant increases in all endpoints/tissues. These results compare favorably with earlier in vivo observations and demonstrate the utility and sensitivity of the Pig-a in vivo gene mutation assay, and its ability to be easily integrated, along with other standard genotoxicity endpoints, into 28-day rodent toxicity studies.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25934985      PMCID: PMC4506322          DOI: 10.1093/mutage/gev013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  31 in total

1.  In vivo transgenic mutation assays.

Authors:  J A Heddle; S Dean; T Nohmi; M Boerrigter; D Casciano; G R Douglas; B W Glickman; N J Gorelick; J C Mirsalis; H J Martus; T R Skopek; V Thybaud; K R Tindall; N Yajima
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.216

2.  In vivo transgenic mutation assays.

Authors:  Véronique Thybaud; Stephen Dean; Takehiko Nohmi; Johan de Boer; George R Douglas; Barry W Glickman; Nancy J Gorelick; John A Heddle; Robert H Heflich; Iain Lambert; Hans-Jörg Martus; Jon C Mirsalis; Takayoshi Suzuki; Nobuhiro Yajima
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Metabolism of ethyl carbamate by pulmonary cytochrome P450 and carboxylesterase isozymes: involvement of CYP2E1 and hydrolase A.

Authors:  P G Forkert; R P Lee
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 4.  Report of the IWGT working group on strategy/interpretation for regulatory in vivo tests II. Identification of in vivo-only positive compounds in the bone marrow micronucleus test.

Authors:  D J Tweats; D Blakey; R H Heflich; A Jacobs; S D Jacobsen; T Morita; T Nohmi; M R O'Donovan; Y F Sasaki; T Sofuni; R Tice
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Sensitivity of the erythrocyte micronucleus assay: dependence on number of cells scored and inter-animal variability.

Authors:  Grace E Kissling; Stephen D Dertinger; Makoto Hayashi; James T MacGregor
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Enzymatic oxidation of ethyl carbamate to vinyl carbamate and its role as an intermediate in the formation of 1,N6-ethenoadenosine.

Authors:  F P Guengerich; D H Kim
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 7.  Mutagenicity, metabolism, and DNA interactions of urethane.

Authors:  R E Sotomayor; T F Collins
Journal:  Toxicol Ind Health       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.273

8.  Inhibition of urethane-induced genotoxicity and cell proliferation in CYP2E1-null mice.

Authors:  Undi Hoffler; Darlene Dixon; Shyamal Peddada; Burhan I Ghanayem
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2005-05-02       Impact factor: 2.433

9.  In vivo mutation assay based on the endogenous Pig-a locus.

Authors:  Steven M Bryce; Jeffrey C Bemis; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.216

10.  Development of an in vivo gene mutation assay using the endogenous Pig-A gene: II. Selection of Pig-A mutant rat spleen T-cells with proaerolysin and sequencing Pig-A cDNA from the mutants.

Authors:  Daishiro Miura; Vasily N Dobrovolsky; Roberta A Mittelstaedt; Yoshinori Kasahara; Yasuhiro Katsuura; Robert H Heflich
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.216

View more
  5 in total

1.  Rat Pig-a mutation assay responds to the genotoxic carcinogen ethyl carbamate but not the non-genotoxic carcinogen methyl carbamate.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Bemis; Carson Labash; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Kristine Carlson; Ariel Berg; Dorothea K Torous; Matthew Barragato; James T MacGregor; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  In vivo pig-a and micronucleus study of the prototypical aneugen vinblastine sulfate.

Authors:  Svetlana L Avlasevich; Carson Labash; Dorothea K Torous; Jeffrey C Bemis; James T MacGregor; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 3.216

3.  Cigarette smoke induced genotoxicity and respiratory tract pathology: evidence to support reduced exposure time and animal numbers in tobacco product testing.

Authors:  Annette Dalrymple; Patricia Ordoñez; David Thorne; David Walker; Oscar M Camacho; Ansgar Büttner; Debbie Dillon; Clive Meredith
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  Enigmatic mechanism of the N-vinylpyrrolidone hepatocarcinogenicity in the rat.

Authors:  Franz Oesch; Daniela Fruth; Jan G Hengstler; Eric Fabian; Franz Ingo Berger; Robert Landsiedel
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 5.153

5.  A novel, integrated in vitro carcinogenicity test to identify genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens using human lymphoblastoid cells.

Authors:  Eleanor C Wilde; Katherine E Chapman; Leanne M Stannard; Anna L Seager; Katja Brüsehafer; Ume-Kulsoom Shah; James A Tonkin; M Rowan Brown; Jatin R Verma; Ann T Doherty; George E Johnson; Shareen H Doak; Gareth J S Jenkins
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 6.168

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.