Literature DB >> 14550498

In vivo transgenic mutation assays.

Véronique Thybaud1, Stephen Dean, Takehiko Nohmi, Johan de Boer, George R Douglas, Barry W Glickman, Nancy J Gorelick, John A Heddle, Robert H Heflich, Iain Lambert, Hans-Jörg Martus, Jon C Mirsalis, Takayoshi Suzuki, Nobuhiro Yajima.   

Abstract

Transgenic rodent gene-mutation models provide relatively quick and statistically reliable assays for gene mutations in the DNA from any tissue. This report summarizes those issues that have been agreed upon at a previous IWGT meeting [Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 35 (2000) 253], and discusses in depth those issues for which no consensus was reached before. It was previously agreed that for regulatory applications, assays should be based upon neutral genes, be generally available in several laboratories, and be readily transferable. For phage-based assays, five to ten animals per group should be analyzed, assuming a spontaneous mutant frequency (MF) of approximately 3x10(-5) mutants/locus and 125,000-300,000 plaque or colony forming units (pfu or cfu) per tissue per animal. A full set of data should be generated for a vehicle control and two dose groups. Concurrent positive control animals are only necessary during validation, but positive control DNA must be included in each plating. Tissues should be processed and analyzed in a blocked design, where samples from negative control, positive control and each treatment group are processed together. The total number of pfus or cfus and the MF for each tissue and animal are reported. Statistical tests should consider the animal as the experimental unit. Nonparametric statistical tests are recommended. A positive result is a statistically significant dose-response and/or statistically significant increase in any dose group compared to concurrent negative controls using an appropriate statistical model. A negative result is a statistically non-significant change, with all mean MFs within two standard deviations of the control. During the current workshop, a general protocol was agreed in which animals are treated daily for 28 consecutive days and tissues sampled 3 days after the final treatment. This recommendation could be modified by reducing or increasing the number of treatments or the length of the treatment period, when scientifically justified. Normally male animals alone are sufficient and normally at least one rapidly proliferating and one slowly proliferating tissue should be sampled. Although, as agreed previously, sequencing data are not normally required, they might provide useful additional information in specific circumstances, mainly to identify and correct for clonal expansion and in some cases to determine a mechanism associated with a positive response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14550498     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2003.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  20 in total

1.  Analysis of Biomarkers of DNA Damage and Mutagenicity in Mice Exposed to Acrylonitrile.

Authors:  Vernon E Walker; Dale M Walker; Burhan I Ghanayem; George R Douglas
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 3.739

2.  Rat Pig-a mutation assay responds to the genotoxic carcinogen ethyl carbamate but not the non-genotoxic carcinogen methyl carbamate.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Bemis; Carson Labash; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Kristine Carlson; Ariel Berg; Dorothea K Torous; Matthew Barragato; James T MacGregor; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Assisted reproductive technologies do not alter mutation frequency or spectrum.

Authors:  Lee Caperton; Patricia Murphey; Yukiko Yamazaki; C Alex McMahan; Christi A Walter; Ryuzo Yanagimachi; John R McCarrey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Evidence for mutation showers.

Authors:  Jicheng Wang; Kelly D Gonzalez; William A Scaringe; Kimberly Tsai; Ning Liu; Dongqing Gu; Wenyan Li; Kathleen A Hill; Steve S Sommer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Integration of Pig-a, micronucleus, chromosome aberration and comet assay endpoints in a 28-day rodent toxicity study with urethane.

Authors:  Leon F Stankowski; Marilyn J Aardema; Timothy E Lawlor; Kamala Pant; Shambhu Roy; Yong Xu; Reem Elbekai
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  A comparison of transgenic rodent mutation and in vivo comet assay responses for 91 chemicals.

Authors:  David Kirkland; Dan D Levy; Matthew J LeBaron; Marilyn J Aardema; Carol Beevers; Javed Bhalli; George R Douglas; Patricia A Escobar; Christopher S Farabaugh; Melanie Guerard; George E Johnson; Rohan Kulkarni; Frank Le Curieux; Alexandra S Long; Jasmin Lott; David P Lovell; Mirjam Luijten; Francesco Marchetti; John J Nicolette; Stefan Pfuhler; Daniel J Roberts; Leon F Stankowski; Veronique Thybaud; Sandy K Weiner; Andrew Williams; Kristine L Witt; Robert Young
Journal:  Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 2.873

7.  Integration of in vivo genotoxicity and short-term carcinogenicity assays using F344 gpt delta transgenic rats: in vivo mutagenicity of 2,4-diaminotoluene and 2,6-diaminotoluene structural isomers.

Authors:  Naomi Toyoda-Hokaiwado; Tomoki Inoue; Kenichi Masumura; Hiroyuki Hayashi; Yuji Kawamura; Yasushi Kurata; Makiko Takamune; Masami Yamada; Hisakazu Sanada; Takashi Umemura; Akiyoshi Nishikawa; Takehiko Nohmi
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Enhanced genetic integrity in mouse germ cells.

Authors:  Patricia Murphey; Derek J McLean; C Alex McMahan; Christi A Walter; John R McCarrey
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 4.285

9.  The Lambda Select cII Mutation Detection System.

Authors:  Ahmad Besaratinia; Stella Tommasi
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Induction of lacZ mutations in MutaMouse primary hepatocytes.

Authors:  Guosheng Chen; John Gingerich; Lynda Soper; George R Douglas; Paul A White
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.