| Literature DB >> 27160659 |
Annette Dalrymple1, Patricia Ordoñez2, David Thorne1, David Walker1, Oscar M Camacho1, Ansgar Büttner3, Debbie Dillon1, Clive Meredith1.
Abstract
Many laboratories are working to develop in vitro models that will replace in vivo tests, but occasionally there remains a regulatory expectation of some in vivo testing. Historically, cigarettes have been tested in vivo for 90 days. Recently, methods to reduce and refine animal use have been explored. This study investigated the potential of reducing animal cigarette smoke (CS) exposure to 3 or 6 weeks, and the feasibility of separate lung lobes for histopathology or the Comet assay. Rats were exposed to sham air or CS (1 or 2 h) for 3 or 6 weeks. Respiratory tissues were processed for histopathological evaluation, and Alveolar type II cells (AEC II) isolated for the Comet assay. Blood was collected for Pig-a and micronucleus quantification. Histopathological analyses demonstrated exposure effects, which were generally dependent on CS dose (1 or 2 h, 5 days/week). Comet analysis identified that DNA damage increased in AEC II following 3 or 6 weeks CS exposure, and the level at 6 weeks was higher than 3 weeks. Pig-a mutation or micronucleus levels were not increased. In conclusion, this study showed that 3 weeks of CS exposure was sufficient to observe respiratory tract pathology and DNA damage in isolated AEC II. Differences between the 3 and 6 week data imply that DNA damage in the lung is cumulative. Reducing exposure time, plus analyzing separate lung lobes for DNA damage or histopathology, supports a strategy to reduce and refine animal use in tobacco product testing and is aligned to the 3Rs (replacement, reduction and refinement).Entities:
Keywords: Cigarette smoke; DNA damage; comet assay; in vivo; inhalation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27160659 PMCID: PMC4898166 DOI: 10.3109/08958378.2016.1170911
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Inhal Toxicol ISSN: 0895-8378 Impact factor: 2.724
Comparison of OECD 413 histopathological levels analyzed by the tobacco industry and the current study.
| OECD 413 (OECD, | 3- and 6-week inhalation method | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tissue | Stain | Number of tissue levels & orientation | Number of tissue levels and orientation | Comments |
| Nasal cavity | H&E AB-PAS | 4 (levels to include the nasopharyngeal duct & nasal associated lymphoid tissue) | 1 (transverse) | Anterior to Young’s level 2 (Young, |
| Larynx | H&E | Not applicable | 1 (transverse) | At the base of epiglottis |
| Larynx | H&E | 3 (including the base of the epiglottis) | 1 (transverse) | At arytenoid projections and ventral pouch (Renne et al., |
| Trachea | H&E AB-PAS | 2 (longitudinal section through the carina & transverse section) | 1 (transverse) | At thyroid glands (Walker et al., |
| Left lung | H&E AB-PAS | 1 (longitudinal including main bronchi) | 1 (longitudinal) | Through main bronchus, 4 secondary bronchi visible (OECD, |
| Right lung | H&E | 1 (longitudinal of each lobe including main bronchi) | Not applicable | Used for Comet assay |
Body weight and body weight gain on the day of sacrifice following sham air or 3R4F reference cigarette exposure for 3 or 6 weeks.
| Sham air | 3R4F 1 h/day (600 μg WTPM/L) | 3R4F 2 h/day (600 μg WTPM/L) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Statistics | 3 weeks | 6 weeks | 3 weeks | 6 weeks | 3 weeks | 6 weeks |
| Female | Mean (SEM)Test1/2 | 231.26 (4.55)–/– | 253.10 (5.44)–/– | 243.32 (4.79)=/– | 254.61 (6.22)=/– | 245.57 (7.12)=/= | 249.68 (7.04)=/= |
| Male | Mean (SEM)Test1/2 | 335.91 (6.74)–/– | 403.59 (7.02)–/– | 323.74 (6.40)=/– | 380.76 (8.98)=/– | 321.03 (6.80)=/= | 331.32 (7.86)+++/+++ |
| Female | Mean (SEM)Test1/2 | 6.8%± (1.8)–/– | 15.2%± (1.7)–/– | 10.1%± (1.4)=/– | 15.6%± (2.9)=/– | 11.0%± (2.3)=/= | 15.7%± (1.9)=/= |
| Male | Mean (SEM)Test1/2 | 21.9% (1.6)–/– | 43.0%± (1.5)–/– | 17.8%± (1.5)=/– | 35.4%± (3.1)+/– | 11.3%± (1.9) +++/+ | 18.0%± (1.5) +++/+++ |
Test1, comparison to sham air; Test2, comparison to 1 h 3R4F; –, not applicable; =, p > 0.05 (not statistically significant); +, p < 0.05; +++, p < 0.001.
Histopathological analysis of the nasal cavity following sham air or 3R4F CS exposure for 3 and 6 weeks.
| Sham air | 3R4F 1 h/day (600 μg WTPM/L) | 3R4F 2 h/day (600 μg WTPM/L) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint | Site | Statistics | 3 weeks | 6 weeks | 3 weeks | 6 weeks | 3 weeks | 6 weeks |
| Reserve cell hyperplasia | Respiratory epithelium at maxilloturbinates and lateral aspect of nose | Mean (SEM)% IncidenceTest1/2/3 | 0.5 (0.11)50–/–/– | 0.1 (0.07)10–/–/οο | 2.3 (0.18)95+++/–/– | 2.5 (0.17)100+++/–/= | 3.9 (0.07)100+++/^^^/– | 3.9 (0.10)100+++/^^^/= |
| Squamous epithelial metaplasia | Mean (SEM)% IncidenceTest1/2/3 | 0.00–/–/– | 0.00–/–/= | 0.4 (0.11)35++/–/– | 0.4 (0.15)25+/–/= | 2.9 (0.11)100+++/^^^/– | 3.1 (0.14)100+++/^^^/= | |
| Loss of goblet cells | Respiratory epithelium at nasal septum | Mean (SEM)% IncidenceTest1/2/3 | 0.5 (0.14)40–/–/– | 0.00–/–/οο | 1.8 (0.22)90+++/–/– | 1.4 (0.21)85+++/–/= | 2.3 (0.22)100+++/^^/– | 3.2 (0.23)100+++/^^^/ο |
| Atrophy | Olfactory epithelium at the dorsal meatus | Mean (SEM)% IncidenceTest1/2/3 | 0.00–/–/– | 0.00–/–/= | 0.2 (0.12)15=/–/– | 0.1 (0.05)5=/–/= | 1.3 (0.33)63+++/^^/– | 2.1 (0.26)94+++/^^^/ο |
| Loss of nerve bundles | Mean (SEM)% IncidenceTest1/2/3 | 0.00–/–/– | 0.00–/–/= | 0.1 (0.05)5=/–/– | 0.00=/–/= | 0.9 (0.39)32++/^/– | 1.7 (0.37)67+++/^^^/= | |
| Squamous epithelial metaplasia | Mean (SEM)% IncidenceTest1/2/3 | 0.00–/–/– | 0.00–/–/= | 0.1 (0.10)5=/–/– | 0.00=/–/= | 0.4 (0.16)26+/=/– | 0.6 (0.20)33++/^^/= | |
Mean, mean severity score; SEM, standard error of mean; –, not applicable; =, p > 0.05 (not statistically significant). Test1: comparison to sham air; +, p < 0.05; ++, p < 0.01; +++, p < 0.001. Test2: comparison to 1 h 3R4F; ^, p < 0.05; ^^, p < 0.01; ^^^, p < 0.001. Test3: comparison to 3-week timepoint; ο, p < 0.05; οο, p < 0.01; οοο: p < 0.001.
Figure 1. The histopathological response of nasal cavity endpoints following sham air or 3- and 6-week 3R4F CS exposure. Values plotted are mean severity score ± SEM of reserve (basal) cell hyperplasia (respiratory epithelium), squamous epithelial metaplasia (respiratory epithelium), loss of goblet cells (septum) and atrophy (olfactory epithelium). Statistical significance when compared to sham air (*), 1-h 3R4F exposure (+) or 3-week exposure time point (#) are detailed.
Figure 2. Histopathological responses following 6-week sham air or 3R4F CS exposure (2 h/day). (A–F): 25× magnification, (A′–F′): 200× magnification of sham air exposure group. (A″–F″): 200× magnification of 3R4F CS exposure for 2 h/day. (A″): Atrophy of the nasal olfactory epithelium at dorsal meatus associated with loss of nerve bundles in the lamina propria. (B″): Respiratory epithelium nasal reserve (basal) cell hyperplasia and initial squamous epithelial metaplasia. (C″): Larynx epithelial hyperplasia and cornification at the lower medial region of vocal cords (arytenoid projections). (D″): Reserve (basal) cell hyperplasia of the tracheal epithelium. (E″): Left lung (parenchyma) yellow pigmented and non-pigmented macrophages in the alveolar lumen. (F″): Left lung (main bronchus) bronchial epithelium goblet cell hyperplasia.
Histopathological analysis of the larynx following sham air or 3R4F CS exposure for 3 and 6 weeks.
| Sham air | 3R4F 1 h/day (600 μg WTPM/L) | 3R4F 2 h/day (600 μg WTPM/L) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint | Site | Statistics | 3 weeks | 6 weeks | 3 weeks | 6 weeks | 3 weeks | 6 weeks |
| Squamous epithelial metaplasia | Ventral base of epiglottis (sectioning level base of epiglottis) | Mean (SEM)% incidenceTest1/2/3 | 0.7 (0.11)72–/–/– | 0.6 (0.11)55–/–/= | 4.6 (0.11)100+++/–/– | 4.6 (0.11)100+++/–/= | 5.0 (0.00)100+++/^^^/– | 5.0 (0.00)100+++/^^/= |
| Amount of cornification | Mean (SEM)% incidenceTest1/2/3 | 0.00–/–/– | 0.00–/–/= | 3.1 (0.22)100+++/–/– | 3.7 (0.25)100+++/–/= | 5.0100+++/^^^/– | 4.9 (0.05)100+++/^^^/= | |
| Squamous epithelial metaplasia | Ventral depression (sectioning level arytenoid projections) | Mean (SEM)% incidenceTest1/2/3 | 0.00–/–/– | 0.00–/–/= | 0.3 (0.13)21+/–/– | 1.2 (0.29)58+++/–/οο | 1.3 (0.22)79+++/^^^/– | 3.0 (0.28)100+++/^^^/οοο |
| Amount of cornification | Mean (SEM)% incidenceTest1/2/3 | 0.00–/–/– | 0.00–/–/= | 0.00=/–/– | 0.00=/–/= | 0.00=/=/– | 0.9 (0.40)28+/^/ο | |
| Squamous epithelial metaplasia | Floor of the larynx (sectioning level arytenoid projections) | Mean (SEM)% incidenceTest1/2/3 | 0.1 (0.07)11–/–/– | 0.3 (0.10)25–/–/= | 3.8 (0.21)100+++/–/– | 4.5 (0.15)100+++/–/οο | 5.0 (0.00)100+++/^^^/– | 5.0 (0.00)100+++/^^/= |
| Amount of cornification | Mean (SEM)% incidenceTest1/2/3 | 0.00–/–/– | 0.00–/–/= | 1.6 (0.35)63+++/–/– | 3.2 (0.37)90+++/–/οο | 4.9 (0.06)100+++/^^^/– | 4.8 (0.17)100+++/^^^/= | |
| Squamous hyperplasia | LMR of vocal cords (sectioning level arytenoid projections) | Mean (SEM)% incidenceTest1/2/3 | 0.4 (0.14)33–/–/– | 0.4 (0.11)35–/–/= | 3.1 (0.17)100+++/–/– | 3.6 (0.15)100+++/–/= | 3.9 (0.10)100+++/^^^/– | 4.5 (0.12)100+++/^^^/οο |
| Amount of cornification | Mean (SEM)% incidenceTest1/2/3 | 0.00–/–/– | 0.00–/–/= | 0.00=/–/– | 0.3 (0.23)17=/–/= | 2.8 (0.41)83+++/^^^/– | 3.9 (0.21)100+++/^^^/= | |
| Morphometry | Floor of the larynx (μm) | Mean (SEM) | 12.6 (0.6)19–/–/– | 12.3 (0.4)20–/–/= | 38.6 (2.0)17+++/–/– | 40.2 (2.0)20+++/–/= | 44.1 (2.0)18+++/=/– | 41.7 (2.6)18+++/=/= |
| Morphometry | LMR of vocal cords (μm) | Mean (SEM) | 15.9 (0.8)18–/–/– | 15.6 (0.7)20–/–/= | 27.8 (0.9)16+++/–/– | 31.1 (1.1)18+++/–/ο | 39.4 (1.4)18+++/^^^/– | 42.0 (1.0)17+++/^^^/= |
Mean, mean severity score; SEM, standard error of mean; –, not applicable; =, p > 0.05 (not statistically significant). Test1: comparison to sham air; +, p < 0.05, ++, p < 0.01, +++, p < 0.001. Test2: comparison to 1 h 3R4F; ^, p < 0.05; ^^, p < 0.01; ^^^, p < 0.001. Test3: comparison to 3-week timepoint; ο, p < 0.05; οο, p < 0.01; οοο, p < 0.001. N, number of investigated animals; LMR, lower medial region.
Histopathological analysis of the trachea and left lung following sham air or 3R4F CS exposure for 3 and 6 weeks.
| Sham air | 3R4F 1 h/day (600 μg WTPM/L) | 3R4F 2 h/day (600 μg WTPM/L) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint | Site | Statistics | 3 weeks | 6 weeks | 3 weeks | 6 weeks | 3 weeks | 6 weeks |
| Amount of goblet cells | Trachea, transverse section at the level of thyroid glands | Mean (SEM)% incidenceTest1/2/3 | 2.3 (0.16)100–/–/– | 2.2 (0.17)100–/–/= | 2.0 (0.19)95=/–/– | 2.2 (0.13)100=/–/= | 0.7 (0.20)53+++/^^^/– | 1.1 (0.21)68+++/^^^/= |
| Reserve cell hyperplasia | Mean (SEM)% incidenceTest1/2/3 | 0.1 (0.08)11–/–/– | 0.2 (0.08)15–/–/= | 0.6 (0.17)40+/–/– | 0.7 (0.20)45+/–/= | 2.2 (0.24)89+++/^^^/– | 2.1 (0.16)95+++/^^^/= | |
| Squamous epithelial metaplasia | Mean (SEM)% incidenceTest1/2/3 | 0.00–/–/– | 0.00–/–/= | 0.00=/–/– | 0.00=/–/= | 0.3 (0.15)21+/^/– | 0.7 (0.15)58+++/^^^/ο | |
| Non-pigmented macrophages | Left lung, alveolar lumen | Mean (SEM)% incidenceTest1/2/3 | 0.5 (0.14)45–/–/– | 0.5 (0.15)3–/–/= | 1.1 (0.19)76+/–/– | 1.9 (0.18)95+++/–/ο | 1.9 (0.20)89+++/^^/– | 2.4 (0.19)95+++/^/ο |
| Yellow pigmented macrophages | Mean (SEM)% incidenceTest1/2/3 | 0.00–/–/– | 0.00–/–/= | 0.0 (0.0)0=/–/– | 0.5 (0.14)40++/–/οο | 0.2 (0.09)17=/=/– | 1.1 (0.17)79+++/^^/οοο | |
| Goblet cell hyperplasia | Left lung, intrapulmonary main bronchus | Mean (SEM)% incidenceTest1/2/3 | 0.6 (0.19)47–/–/– | 0.4 (0.16)38–/–/= | 1.5 (0.27)86+/–/– | 1.5 (0.30)71+/–/= | 0.9 (0.21)64=/=/– | 1.4 (0.26)81+/=/= |
Mean, mean severity score; SEM, standard error of the mean; –, not applicable; =, p > 0.05 (not statistically significant). Test1: comparison to sham air; +, p < 0.05; ++, p < 0.01; +++, p < 0.001. Test2: comparison to 1 h 3R4F; ^, p < 0.05; ^^, p < 0.01; ^^^, p < 0.001. Test3: comparison to 3-week timepoint; ο, p < 0.05; οο, p < 0.01; οοο, p < 0.001.
Figure 5. The histopathological response of the trachea and lung following 3- and 6-week sham air or 3R4F CS exposure. Values plotted are mean severity score ± SEM of the trachea (reserve cell hyperplasia) and left lung lobe (non-pigmented macrophages, yellow pigmented macrophages, bronchial goblet cell hyperplasia). Statistical significance when compared to sham air (*), 1-h 3R4F exposure (+) or 3-week exposure time point (#) are detailed.
Figure 6. The level of DNA damage as measure by the (A) Alkaline Comet assay (single strand breaks) and (B) Modified Alkaline Comet assay (oxidative DNA damage) in isolated AEC II after 3 and 6 weeks exposure to sham air or 3R4F CS for 1 or 2 h/day. Values plotted are mean % DNA tail ± SD. Statistical significance when compared to sham air (*) or 3-week exposure time point (#) are detailed.
Figure 7. The level of basal DNA damage and MMS induced DNA damage as measured by the Alkaline Comet assay in isolated AEC II from the left and right lung lobes. Values plotted are mean % DNA tail ± SD.
Figure 8. The level of DNA damage as measure by the (A) Alkaline Comet assay (single strand breaks) and (B) Modified Alkaline Comet assay (oxidative DNA damage) in isolated AEC II following 5 days exposure to sham air or 3R4F CS for 1 h/day. Values plotted are mean % DNA tail ± SD. *Statistical significance when compared to sham air exposed corresponding lung lobe.