Literature DB >> 11201961

Finishing occlusion, degree of stability and the PAR index.

M Woods1, D Lee, E Crawford.   

Abstract

The occlusions of sixty-five patients, treated by one private specialist orthodontist with consistent philosophy and goals, were assessed according to the PAR Index. For each patient, pre-treatment, post-treatment and follow-up study models were assessed. Follow-up models were taken at least 6.5 years following the removal of all retention appliances. Mean-weighted PAR scores were calculated for the total sample and various sub-groups at each stage. Mean percentage changes in weighted PAR scores were also calculated. The relationships between the occlusal standards at the end of active treatment and at the end of the follow-up period, and specific diagnostic and treatment factors were then investigated to search for any factors that might be predictive of long-term post-treatment occlusal stability or instability. The overall mean-weighted pre-treatment, post-treatment and follow-up PAR scores were 25.5, 3.0 and 7.0, respectively. There was an 85.6 per cent decrease with treatment in the overall mean-weighted PAR score. This was followed by a 15.2 per cent increase in that overall mean during the follow-up period. In this introductory study, neither the PAR score at the end of active treatment, nor the amounts of occlusal change occurring during or after active treatment, were found to be predictive of the amount of post-treatment occlusal change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11201961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Orthod J        ISSN: 0587-3908


  7 in total

1.  Dental compensation for skeletal Class III malocclusion by isolated extraction of mandibular teeth. Part 1: Occlusal situation 12 years after completion of active treatment.

Authors:  Bernd Zimmer; Sarah Schenk-Kazan
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Posttreatment and physiologic occlusal changes comparison.

Authors:  Karina Maria S Freitas; Guilherme Janson; Bryan Tompson; Marcos Roberto de Freitas; Tassiana Mesquita Simão; Fabrício Pinelli Valarelli; Rodrigo Hermont Cançado
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Age-related long-term posttreatment occlusal and arch changes.

Authors:  Hyunjung Park; Jim C Boley; Richard A Alexander; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Factors associated with long-term patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Nair Galvão Maia; David Normando; Francisco Ajalmar Maia; Maria Angela Fernandes Ferreira; Maria do Socorro Costa Feitosa Alves
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Anterior tooth alignment: A comparison of orthodontic retention regimens 5 years posttreatment.

Authors:  Ragnar Bjering; Kari Birkeland; Vaska Vandevska-Radunovic
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Retrospective analysis of orthodontic treatment outcomes and its relation to postretention stability.

Authors:  Karina Maria Salvatore de Freitas; Marcos Roberto de Freitas; Guilherme Janson; Arnaldo Pinzan; José Fernando Castanha Henriques
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  Stability of Class II treatment with the Bionator followed by fixed appliances.

Authors:  Manoela Fávaro Francisconi; José Fernando Castanha Henriques; Guilherme Janson; Karina Maria Salvatore de Freitas; Patrícia Bittencourt Dutra dos Santos
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.