Literature DB >> 2974864

Representing statics as forces in equilibrium.

J J Freyd1, T M Pantzer, J L Cheng.   

Abstract

Resting objects can be described according to the physical forces operating on them, forces that are balanced in static scenes. We hypothesized that in a related way, the perception of static scenes and objects might involve a representation of underlying dynamics. In our first experiments, subjects were shown a picture of a plant resting upon a table or hanging from a hook, followed by a picture of the plant in the same position without the supporting table or hook. Subjects attempted to remember the position of the plant and were then shown a third display, in which the plant was in the same position or was slightly above or slightly below the original position. We found that subjects made more errors for test displays showing the plant slightly below, as compared with displays showing the plant slightly above, the original position. That is, memory for the position of the previously supported object was distorted in the direction consistent with what would happen if the plant was to lose its source of support in real life. This effect depends on the initial display of support; in Experiment 2 we found no memory asymmetry when the plant was initially displayed without support. We replicated the results of Experiments 1 and 2 with a new stimulus set and modified procedure in Experiment 3. In our fourth study we experimented with a slightly different stable situation: a spring with a box on top of it. We found that subjects misremembered the spring as either more compressed or less compressed as predicted by the implied dynamics of the display sequence. We discuss issues raised by our findings, including the possibility that the conscious experience of concreteness in static scenes stems from the representation of underlying forces.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2974864     DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.117.4.395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  15 in total

1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation over MT/MST fails to impair judgments of implied motion.

Authors:  James L Alford; Paul van Donkelaar; Paul Dassonville; Richard T Marrocco
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 2.  Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings.

Authors:  Timothy L Hubbard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

3.  Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: Implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force.

Authors:  T L Hubbard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-09

4.  Perception of physical stability and center of mass of 3-D objects.

Authors:  Steven A Cholewiak; Roland W Fleming; Manish Singh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Cognitive representation of linear motion: possible direction and gravity effects in judged displacement.

Authors:  T L Hubbard
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-05

6.  Spatial language and the psychological reality of schematization.

Authors:  Kevin J Holmes; Phillip Wolff
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-02-13

7.  Contextual processing of brightness and color in Mongolian gerbils.

Authors:  Christian Garbers; Josephine Henke; Christian Leibold; Thomas Wachtler; Kay Thurley
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  The visual representations of motion and of gravity are functionally independent: Evidence of a differential effect of smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Nuno Alexandre De Sá Teixeira
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Curved apparent motion induced by amodal completion.

Authors:  Sung-Ho Kim; Jacob Feldman; Manish Singh
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  The role of cortical areas hMT/V5+ and TPJ on the magnitude of representational momentum and representational gravity: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Nuno Alexandre De Sá Teixeira; Gianfranco Bosco; Sergio Delle Monache; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.