Literature DB >> 17558298

Perceptual processing time differences owing to visual field asymmetries.

Anthony N Carlsen1, Dana Maslovat, Romeo Chua, Ian M Franks.   

Abstract

Recent experiments have reported increased endpoint accuracy for movements performed in the lower vs. the upper visual field, suggesting that there is superior feedback-based processing in the lower visual field owing to a visuomotor subsystem processing advantage. Differences, however, in the perceptual subsystem may also play a role in the lower visual field advantage. In this study, participants performed an inspection time task, a measure of perceptual processing time, requiring the identification of an asymmetrical 'pi' stimulus presented in the central, upper, or the lower visual field for a brief period. Significant differences between the percentage of correct identifications between visual fields indicated a lower visual field advantage over upper visual field for perceptual identification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17558298     DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3281ac22f1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  4 in total

1.  Representational momentum reveals visual anticipation differences in the upper and lower visual fields.

Authors:  Victoria M Gottwald; Gavin P Lawrence; Amy E Hayes; Michael A Khan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Brightness induction and suprathreshold vision: effects of age and visual field.

Authors:  Mark E McCourt; Lynnette M Leone; Barbara Blakeslee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Differential vertical visual latency as determined with a simultaneity paradigm.

Authors:  Shephali Patel; Steven H Schwartz; William H Swanson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Visual processing is diminished during movement execution.

Authors:  Joëlle Hajj; Dana Maslovat; Erin K Cressman; Laura St Germain; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.