| Literature DB >> 25929466 |
Hieu T Nim1,2, Milena B Furtado3, Mauro W Costa4, Nadia A Rosenthal5,6,7, Hiroaki Kitano8,9,10,11, Sarah E Boyd12,13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Existing de novo software platforms have largely overlooked a valuable resource, the expertise of the intended biologist users. Typical data representations such as long gene lists, or highly dense and overlapping transcription factor networks often hinder biologists from relating these results to their expertise.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25929466 PMCID: PMC4426166 DOI: 10.1186/s12859-015-0578-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Bioinformatics ISSN: 1471-2105 Impact factor: 3.169
Figure 1VISIONET implementation uniqueness. (A) Comparison of VISIONET features with popular biological network visualisation analysis tools. VISIONET implements five features to facilitate expertise-driven visualisation and analysis of overlapping transcription factor networks. Using empirical evaluation based on our case study, the availability of these features was assessed in the most popular existing tools: CellDesigner v4.4 [17], PAYAO [18], Cytoscape v2.8 [19], VisANT 4.0 [20], and WikiPathways [21]. (B) Schematic flowchart illustrating the architecture of VISIONET, designed to facilitate expertise-driven biological discovery. Gene expression and TF binding site data are supplied to VISIONET, and biologist interacts with VISIONET to determine which network components to display. Internally, VISIONET performs the computationally intensive task of data integration, graph layout and network filtering.
Figure 2Comparison of VISIONET with the current state-of-art visualisation platforms, using the Gata4-Tbx20 case study. (A) Network using the customised VISIONET layout. (B) Network rending by Cytoscape using the “grouped by degree” layout (the most readable layout among other Cytoscape layouts in our empirical testing). (C) Network rending by CellDesigner using the “Circular” layout (the most readable layout among other CellDesigner layouts in our empirical testing).
Figure 3Experimental validation of the utility of the expertise-driven gene discovery approach. (A) Overlapping TF networks of Gata4 and Tbx20 in cardiac fibroblasts generated by VISIONET, with a filter applied to blur out all gene with Log FC(heart/tail) value between −4 and 4. Node colours were determined according to the heart/tail fibroblast fold-change obtained from microarray data [13]. Gata4, Tbx20, and Aldh1a2 were labelled and enlarged, and other node labels were omitted, for improved visualisation. Squares indicate TFs and circles indicate target genes. The full list of differentially-expressed genes is shown in Additional file 1: S1. Log FC(heart/tail): Log2 of the fold change between heart and tail fibroblast expression. The Venn diagram shows the number of targets (based on ChIP-Seq peaks) of the Tbx20 and Gata4. (B) qPCR validation that the Aldh1a2 gene is uniquely up-regulated in cardiac fibroblasts. Means and standard deviations (n = 3) are shown, and (**) indicates p-value < 0.01 (unpaired t-test). (C) Execution time (seconds) precise to 1 decimal place of the VISIONET web service for the Tbx20-Gata4 network using different layout algorithms. All algorithms were implemented in the same programming language and tested on the same computational hardware for comparison consistency.