Literature DB >> 22014521

Animal transcription networks as highly connected, quantitative continua.

Mark D Biggin1.   

Abstract

To understand how transcription factors function, it is essential to determine the range of genes that they each bind and regulate in vivo. Here I review evidence that most animal transcription factors each bind to a majority of genes over a quantitative series of DNA occupancy levels. These continua span functional, quasifunctional, and nonfunctional DNA binding events. Factor regulatory specificities are distinguished by quantitative differences in DNA occupancy patterns. I contrast these results with models for transcription networks that define discrete sets of direct target and nontarget genes and consequently do not fully capture the complexity observed in vivo.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22014521     DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Cell        ISSN: 1534-5807            Impact factor:   12.270


  171 in total

1.  Using competition assays to quantitatively model cooperative binding by transcription factors and other ligands.

Authors:  Jacob Peacock; James B Jaynes
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.770

Review 2.  Structure of developmental gene regulatory networks from the perspective of cell fate-determining genes.

Authors:  Mercedes Martín; María F Organista; Jose F de Celis
Journal:  Transcription       Date:  2016

Review 3.  Molecular features of cellular reprogramming and development.

Authors:  Zachary D Smith; Camille Sindhu; Alexander Meissner
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 94.444

4.  Mapping Local and Global Liquid Phase Behavior in Living Cells Using Photo-Oligomerizable Seeds.

Authors:  Dan Bracha; Mackenzie T Walls; Ming-Tzo Wei; Lian Zhu; Martin Kurian; José L Avalos; Jared E Toettcher; Clifford P Brangwynne
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Program specificity for Ptf1a in pancreas versus neural tube development correlates with distinct collaborating cofactors and chromatin accessibility.

Authors:  David M Meredith; Mark D Borromeo; Tye G Deering; Bradford H Casey; Trisha K Savage; Paul R Mayer; Chinh Hoang; Kuang-Chi Tung; Manonmani Kumar; Chengcheng Shen; Galvin H Swift; Raymond J Macdonald; Jane E Johnson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Positive and negative design for nonconsensus protein-DNA binding affinity in the vicinity of functional binding sites.

Authors:  Ariel Afek; David B Lukatsky
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Evolution of transcriptional enhancers and animal diversity.

Authors:  Marcelo Rubinstein; Flávio S J de Souza
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Low-affinity transcription factor binding sites shape morphogen responses and enhancer evolution.

Authors:  Andrea I Ramos; Scott Barolo
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  Using the ENCODE Resource for Functional Annotation of Genetic Variants.

Authors:  Michael J Pazin
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Protoc       Date:  2015-03-11

10.  Absolute Amounts and Status of the Nrf2-Keap1-Cul3 Complex within Cells.

Authors:  Tatsuro Iso; Takafumi Suzuki; Liam Baird; Masayuki Yamamoto
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.