Literature DB >> 19913429

Speeding up gait initiation and gait-pattern with a startling stimulus.

Ana Queralt1, Josep Valls-Solé, Juan M Castellote.   

Abstract

Human gait involves a repetitive leg motor pattern that emerges after gait initiation. While the automatic maintenance of the gait-pattern may be under the control of subcortical motor centres, gait initiation requires the voluntary launching of a different motor program. In this study, we sought to examine how the two motor programmes respond to an experimental manipulation of the timing of gait initiation. Subjects were instructed to start walking as soon as possible at the perception of an imperative signal (IS) that, in some interspersed trials was accompanied by a startling auditory stimulus (SAS). This method is known to shorten the latency for execution of the motor task under preparation. We reasoned that, if the two motor programmes were launched together, the gait-pattern sequence would respond to SAS in the same way as gait initiation. We recorded the gait phases and the electromyographic (EMG) activity of four muscles from the leg that initiates gait. In trials with SAS, latency of all gait initiation-related events showed a significant shortening and the bursts of EMG activity had higher amplitude and shorter duration than in trials without SAS. The events related to gait-pattern were also advanced but otherwise unchanged. The fact that all the effects of SAS were limited to gait initiation suggests that startle selectively can affect the neural structures involved in gait initiation. Additionally, the proportional advancement of the gait-pattern sequence to the end of gait initiation supports the view that gait initiation may actually trigger the inputs necessary for generating the gait-pattern sequence. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19913429     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  8 in total

1.  The early release of planned movement by acoustic startle can be delayed by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex.

Authors:  Laila Alibiglou; Colum D MacKinnon
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Accessory stimulus modulates executive function during stepping task.

Authors:  Tatsunori Watanabe; Soichiro Koyama; Shigeo Tanabe; Ippei Nojima
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The Neuro-Mechanical Processes That Underlie Goal-Directed Medio-Lateral APA during Gait Initiation.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Honeine; Marco Schieppati; Oscar Crisafulli; Manh-Cuong Do
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Evidence for Startle Effects due to Externally Induced Lower Limb Movements: Implications in Neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Juan M Castellote; Markus Kofler; Andreas Mayr; Leopold Saltuari
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  StartReact during gait initiation reveals differential control of muscle activation and inhibition in patients with corticospinal degeneration.

Authors:  Bas J H van Lith; Milou J M Coppens; Jorik Nonnekes; Bart P C van de Warrenburg; Alexander C Geurts; Vivian Weerdesteyn
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Neural Constraints Affect the Ability to Generate Hip Abduction Torques When Combined With Hip Extension or Ankle Plantarflexion in Chronic Hemiparetic Stroke.

Authors:  Natalia Sánchez; Ana M Acosta; Roberto López-Rosado; Julius P A Dewald
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  The StartReact effect on self-initiated movements.

Authors:  J M Castellote; M E L Van den Berg; J Valls-Solé
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  StartReact effects in first dorsal interosseous muscle are absent in a pinch task, but present when combined with elbow flexion.

Authors:  Juan M Castellote; Markus Kofler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.