Literature DB >> 25921803

Trabecular Bone Score: Where are we now?

Valérie Bousson1, Catherine Bergot2, Bruno Sutter3, Thierry Thomas4, Sauveur Bendavid5, Claude-Laurent Benhamou6, Hubert Blain7, Michel Brazier8, Véronique Breuil9, Karine Briot10, Roland Chapurlat11, Laure Chapuis12, Martine Cohen Solal13, Patrice Fardellone14, Jean-Marc Feron15, Jean-Bernard Gauvain16, Michel Laroche17, Erick Legrand18, Eric Lespessailles6, Agnès Linglart19, Christian Marcelli20, Christian Roux10, Jean-Claude Souberbielle21, Florence Tremollieres22, Georges Weryha23, Bernard Cortet24.   

Abstract

The Trabecular Bone Score is a rather new index obtained at the lumbar spine at the same time as a real bone mineral density. It was developed to reflect bone microarchitecture. It was proposed to be easily used in everyday practice as a surrogate of bone strength. Our aim was to review 1. technical points such as correlations between Trabecular Bone Score and bone microarchitectural parameters, Trabecular Bone Score and bone strength, the effects of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry image spatial resolution, age, macroarchitecture, body mass index, and osteoarthritis, on Trabecular Bone Score, and 2. evidences to use Trabecular Bone Score for separating individuals with fragility fractures from controls, predicting fragility fractures, and for longitudinally monitoring changes related to treatments. Correlations between Trabecular Bone Score and bone microarchitectural parameters vary widely across bone sites, microarchitectural parameters, and study designs. In vivo, the Trabecular Bone Score explains little of the variance in trabecular microarchitectural parameters. We emphasize that it is a texture parameter. The Trabecular Bone Score is reduced in patients with fragility fracture. Several retrospective and prospective studies have shown its discriminative ability regarding the fracture risk. When combining the areal Bone mineral Density and Trabecular Bone Score, the Trabecular Bone Score remains a predictor of fracture but not the areal Bone Mineral Density. However in prospective studies, the best predictor of fracture remains hip areal bone mineral density. Due to the lack of evidence, we recommend not to use Trabecular Bone Score for following patients treated by anti-osteoporotic drugs.
Copyright © 2015 Société française de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone mineral density; Densitometry; Fragility fracture; Osteoporosis; Trabecular Bone Score

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25921803     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2015.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Joint Bone Spine        ISSN: 1297-319X            Impact factor:   4.929


  18 in total

1.  Effect of radiation dose reduction on texture measures of trabecular bone microstructure: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Muthu Rama Krishnan Mookiah; Thomas Baum; Kai Mei; Felix K Kopp; Georg Kaissis; Peter Foehr; Peter B Noel; Jan S Kirschke; Karupppasamy Subburaj
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  TBS and bone strength.

Authors:  Bernard Cortet; Valérie Bousson
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-03-02

Review 3.  Percutaneous stabilization of lumbar spine: a literature review and new options in treating spine pain.

Authors:  Stefano Marcia; Luca Saba; Mariangela Marras; Jasjit S Suri; Eros Calabria; Salvatore Masala
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  [Diagnostics in osteology].

Authors:  F Jakob; F Genest; L Seefried; E Tsourdi; C Lapa; L C Hofbauer
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.743

5.  Osteoporosis Imaging in the Geriatric Patient.

Authors:  Ursula Heilmeier; Jiwon Youm; Soheyla Torabi; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Curr Radiol Rep       Date:  2016-02-15

Review 6.  Patient-Specific Bone Multiscale Modelling, Fracture Simulation and Risk Analysis-A Survey.

Authors:  Amadeus C S de Alcântara; Israel Assis; Daniel Prada; Konrad Mehle; Stefan Schwan; Lucia Costa-Paiva; Munir S Skaf; Luiz C Wrobel; Paulo Sollero
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Bone texture analysis using CT-simulation scans to individuate risk parameters for radiation-induced insufficiency fractures.

Authors:  V Nardone; P Tini; S F Carbone; A Grassi; M Biondi; L Sebaste; T Carfagno; E Vanzi; G De Otto; G Battaglia; G Rubino; P Pastina; G Belmonte; L N Mazzoni; F Banci Buonamici; M A Mazzei; L Pirtoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Variogram-based evaluations of DXA correlate with vertebral strength, but do not enhance the prediction compared to aBMD alone.

Authors:  Xuanliang Neil Dong; Yongtao Lu; Matthias Krause; Gerd Huber; Yan Chevalier; Huijie Leng; Ghislain Maquer
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  3-T MR Imaging of Proximal Femur Microarchitecture in Subjects with and without Fragility Fracture and Nonosteoporotic Proximal Femur Bone Mineral Density.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Chamith S Rajapakse; Cheng Chen; Arakua Welbeck; Kenneth Egol; Ravinder R Regatte; Punam K Saha; Stephen Honig
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Reproducibility of DXA-based bone strain index and the influence of body mass: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Carmelo Messina; Luca Petruccio Piodi; Luca Rinaudo; Ciriaco Buonomenna; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Laura Vergani; Fabio Massimo Ulivieri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.