| Literature DB >> 25918716 |
Yi-Chien Lu1, Wen-Chin Weng2, Hsinyu Lee3.
Abstract
Calreticulin is a highly conserved endoplasmic reticulum chaperone protein which participates in various cellular processes. It was first identified as a Ca(2+)-binding protein in 1974. Accumulated evidences indicate that calreticulin has great impacts for the development of different cancers and the effect of calreticulin on tumor formation and progression may depend on cell types and clinical stages. Cell surface calreticulin is considered as an "eat-me" signal and promotes phagocytic uptake of cancer cells by immune system. Moreover, several reports reveal that manipulation of calreticulin levels profoundly affects cancer cell proliferation and angiogenesis as well as differentiation. In addition to immunogenicity and tumorigenesis, interactions between calreticulin and integrins have been described during cell adhesion, which is an essential process for cancer metastasis. Integrins are heterodimeric transmembrane receptors which connect extracellular matrix and intracellular cytoskeleton and trigger inside-out or outside-in signaling transduction. More and more evidences reveal that proteins binding to integrins might affect integrin-cytoskeleton interaction and therefore influence ability of cell adhesion. Here, we reviewed the biological roles of calreticulin and summarized the potential mechanisms of calreticulin in regulating mRNA stability and therefore contributed to cancer metastasis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25918716 PMCID: PMC4396016 DOI: 10.1155/2015/526524
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1The protein structure and putative functions of calreticulin domains. The figure represents a schema of calreticulin. The protein contains three functional domains: N-domain, P-domain, and C-domain. There is a signal sequence at N-terminal and a KDEL ER retrieval peptide at C-terminal. The two sets of repeated regions are indicated by triangles and squares, respectively. The putative functions of each domain as shown.
Expression of CRT in different cancers.
| Cancer | CRT levels* | Clinical outcomes | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oral | Increased | — | [ |
| Esophagus | Increased | ↓ survival (poor prognosis) | [ |
| Breast | Increased | ↑ metastasis, ↑ invasion, ↓ survival | [ |
| Pancreas | Increased | ↑ lymph node metastasis, ↑ UICC stage, ↓ survival | [ |
| Gastric | Increased | ↑ lymph node metastasis, ↑ invasion, ↑ microvessel density, ↓ survival | [ |
| Colon | Increased | — | [ |
| Bladder | Increased | ↑ urinary CRT, ↑ histological grade, ↑ pathological T stage | [ |
| Prostate | Increased | — | [ |
| Vagina | Increased | — | [ |
| #Ovarian | Increased | Better response to chemotherapy | [ |
| #Neuroblastoma | Increased | ↑ differentiation, ↑ survival | [ |
↑: increased; ↓: decreased.
*CRT levels in tumor tissue except ovarian carcinoma in effusion fluids.
#Higher levels of CRT seem to correlate with good prognosis for the diseases.
Figure 2Knockdown of calreticulin suppressed VEGF-A mRNA expression and protein secretion in bladder cancer cell. Details on CRT-knockdown human bladder cancer cell lines (control and CRT-RNAi) were described previously [36]. (a) Real-Time PCR was used to detect VEGF-A mRNA levels in J82 control and CRT-knockdown cells. Total RNA was isolated by the TRIzol reagent following the manufacturer's instructions. Reverse transcription PCR was carried out using ReverTra Ace reverse transcriptase. Real-Time PCR was performed using the iCycler iQ Real-Time detection system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) with the DNA double-strand specific SYBR Green I dye for detection. RNA expression was normalized to the internal control, GAPDH. (b) VEGF-A secretion levels were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in conditioned media of J82 control and CRT-knockdown cells. Cells were plated at 5 × 105 cells/well in six-well plates. Conditioned media were collected and analyzed using an ELISA kit specific for human VEGF (BioSource, Camarillo, CA, USA). Statistical differences were compared to the control level (* P < 0.05, *** P < 0.001).