Monique Givens1, Amanda Weaver1, Sarah Bickman1, Cathy Logan2, Emilia V Noormahomed2,3, Sam Patel3,4, Robert T Schooley3, Constance A Benson3, Michael J Lochhead1. 1. MBio Diagnostics Inc., 5603 Arapahoe Ave, Suite 1, Boulder, Colorado, 80303. 2. Department of Microbiology, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo, Mozambique, Africa. 3. Division of Infectious Diseases, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0711, San Diego, California, 92093. 4. Department of Medicine, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo, Mozambique, Africa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Point-of-care (POC) CD4 T-cell counting is increasingly recognized as providing improved linkage-to-care during management of HIV infection, particularly in resource-limited settings where disease burden is highest. This study evaluated prototype POC CD4 T-cell counters from MBio Diagnostics in the context of low CD4 count, hospitalized patients in Mozambique. This study measured system performance when presented with challenging, low count samples from HIV/AIDS patients with acute illnesses resulting in hospitalization. METHODS: Forty whole blood samples were collected from donors on the medical service at Maputo Central Hospital and absolute CD4 counts were generated on the MBio CD4 system and a reference laboratory using flow cytometry. RESULTS: The mean and median CD4 counts by the flow cytometry reference were 173 and 80 cells/µL, respectively. Correlation between the MBio CD4 System and the reference was good. Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias of +15 cells/µL (+9 to +21 cells/µL, 95% CI), and limits of agreement of -47 to 77 cells/µL. For samples with counts >100 cells/µL (N = 14), the mean coefficient of variation was 7.3%. For samples with counts <50 cells/µL, mean absolute bias of replicate samples was 4.8 cells/µL. When two MBio readers were compared, Bland-Altman bias was -4 cells/µL (-13 to +6 cells/µL, 95% CI), and limits of agreement of -63 and +55 cells/µL. CONCLUSIONS: The MBio System holds promise as a POC system for quantitation of CD4 T cells in resource-limited settings given system throughput (80-100 cartridges/day), design simplicity, and ease-of-use.
BACKGROUND: Point-of-care (POC) CD4 T-cell counting is increasingly recognized as providing improved linkage-to-care during management of HIV infection, particularly in resource-limited settings where disease burden is highest. This study evaluated prototype POC CD4 T-cell counters from MBio Diagnostics in the context of low CD4 count, hospitalized patients in Mozambique. This study measured system performance when presented with challenging, low count samples from HIV/AIDSpatients with acute illnesses resulting in hospitalization. METHODS: Forty whole blood samples were collected from donors on the medical service at Maputo Central Hospital and absolute CD4 counts were generated on the MBio CD4 system and a reference laboratory using flow cytometry. RESULTS: The mean and median CD4 counts by the flow cytometry reference were 173 and 80 cells/µL, respectively. Correlation between the MBio CD4 System and the reference was good. Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias of +15 cells/µL (+9 to +21 cells/µL, 95% CI), and limits of agreement of -47 to 77 cells/µL. For samples with counts >100 cells/µL (N = 14), the mean coefficient of variation was 7.3%. For samples with counts <50 cells/µL, mean absolute bias of replicate samples was 4.8 cells/µL. When two MBio readers were compared, Bland-Altman bias was -4 cells/µL (-13 to +6 cells/µL, 95% CI), and limits of agreement of -63 and +55 cells/µL. CONCLUSIONS: The MBio System holds promise as a POC system for quantitation of CD4 T cells in resource-limited settings given system throughput (80-100 cartridges/day), design simplicity, and ease-of-use.
Authors: Ilesh V Jani; Nádia E Sitoe; Eunice R Alfai; Patrina L Chongo; Jorge I Quevedo; Beatriz M Rocha; Jonathan D Lehe; Trevor F Peter Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-09-25 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Michael J Lochhead; Kathryn Todorof; Marie Delaney; Jeffrey T Ives; Charles Greef; Kevin Moll; Keagan Rowley; Kurt Vogel; Chris Myatt; Xing-Quan Zhang; Cathy Logan; Constance Benson; Sharon Reed; Robert T Schooley Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2011-08-24 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Ilesh V Jani; Nádia E Sitoe; Patrina L Chongo; Eunice R Alfai; Jorge I Quevedo; Ocean Tobaiwa; Jonathan D Lehe; Trevor F Peter Journal: AIDS Date: 2011-03-27 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: David S Boyle; Kenneth R Hawkins; Matthew S Steele; Mitra Singhal; Xuanhong Cheng Journal: Trends Biotechnol Date: 2011-07-26 Impact factor: 19.536
Authors: Cathy Logan; Monique Givens; Jeffrey T Ives; Marie Delaney; Michael J Lochhead; Robert T Schooley; Constance A Benson Journal: J Immunol Methods Date: 2012-10-11 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: Emilia Noormahomed; Pamela Williams; Andrés G Lescano; Tony Raj; Elizabeth A Bukusi; Robert T Schooley; Craig R Cohen Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 2.345