Literature DB >> 25914900

Colon Cancer Staging in Vulnerable Older Adults: Adherence to National Guidelines and Impact on Survival.

T B Leal1, T Holden2, L Cavalcante2, G O Allen3, J R Schumacher3, M A Smith3, J M Weiss4, H B Neuman5, N K LoConte6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is concern that elders are not adequately evaluated prior to colon cancer surgery. We sought to determine adherence with ACOVE-3 (Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders) quality indicators for pre-operative staging prior to colectomy for colon cancer utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database (1992-2005).
METHODS: We determined the proportion of patients aged 75 and older who had preoperative staging prior to colectomy for colon adenocarcinoma. Preoperative staging was defined as abdominopelvic computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scan (SCAN) and colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy (SCOPE). Multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of adherence. Odds ratios were adjusted for comorbidity, socioeconomic status, and disease severity. The association of adherence to ACOVE-3 and survival was quantified.
RESULTS: Of the 37,862 patients, the majority were 75-84 years, 28% of the patients were ≥85 years. Regarding preoperative staging in the 6-month interval prior to surgical resection, 8% had neither SCAN nor SCOPE, 6% had only SCAN, 43% had only SCOPE, and 43% had both SCAN and SCOPE. Compared to patients who were not staged, those evaluated with either SCOPE alone or SCAN plus SCOPE had lower odds of 3-year mortality. Patients who were staged with SCAN alone had an increased odds of death compared to those who had neither SCAN or SCOPE.
CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that the majority of vulnerable elders with colon cancer did not receive appropriate preoperative staging prior to resection. The findings also confirm that adherence to ACOVE-3 guidelines is associated with improved long-term survival.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACOVE-3; SEER-Medicare; colon cancer; quality indicators; vulnerable elders

Year:  2014        PMID: 25914900      PMCID: PMC4405259     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 2375-7965


  26 in total

1.  Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population.

Authors:  Joan L Warren; Carrie N Klabunde; Deborah Schrag; Peter B Bach; Gerald F Riley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Body MR imaging and CT volume: variations and trends based on an analysis of medicare and fee-for-service health insurance databases.

Authors:  Donald G Mitchell; Laurence Parker; Jonathan H Sunshine; David C Levin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  ESMO Minimum Clinical Recommendations for diagnosis, adjuvant treatment and follow-up of colon cancer.

Authors:  E J D Van Cutsem; V V Kataja
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 4.  Quality indicators for the care of colorectal cancer in vulnerable elders.

Authors:  Marcia L McGory
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 5.  The quality of care. How can it be assessed?

Authors:  A Donabedian
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988 Sep 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The Vulnerable Elders Survey: a tool for identifying vulnerable older people in the community.

Authors:  D Saliba; M Elliott; L Z Rubenstein; D H Solomon; R T Young; C J Kamberg; C Roth; C H MacLean; P G Shekelle; E M Sloss; N S Wenger
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 1: the content, quality, and accessibility of care.

Authors:  Elliott S Fisher; David E Wennberg; Thérèse A Stukel; Daniel J Gottlieb; F L Lucas; Etoile L Pinder
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  The role of preoperative colonoscopy in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J T Isler; P C Brown; F G Lewis; R P Billingham
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Potential for cancer related health services research using a linked Medicare-tumor registry database.

Authors:  A L Potosky; G F Riley; J D Lubitz; R M Mentnech; L G Kessler
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Colon cancer in France: evidence for improvement in management and survival.

Authors:  C Faivre-Finn; A-M Bouvier-Benhamiche; J M Phelip; S Manfredi; V Dancourt; J Faivre
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  2 in total

1.  Improving Quality and Value of Cancer Care for Older Adults.

Authors:  Erika E Ramsdale; Valerie Csik; Andrew E Chapman; Arash Naeim; Beverly Canin
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2017

2.  The association between the composite quality measure "textbook outcome" and long term survival in operated colon cancer.

Authors:  Ching-Chieh Yang; Yu-Feng Tian; Wen-Shan Liu; Chia-Lin Chou; Li-Chin Cheng; Shou-Sheng Chu; Ching-Chih Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.