Literature DB >> 25912607

Influence of workspace constraints on directional preferences of 3D arm movements.

Wanyue Wang1, Natalia Dounskaia.   

Abstract

We previously demonstrated a tendency to perform arm movements by using a trailing joint control pattern during which either the shoulder or elbow is rotated actively and the other (trailing) joint is rotated predominantly passively, by interaction torque during horizontal movements and by interaction and gravitational torque during 3D arm movements. This tendency was established with a free-stroke drawing task that required production of series of strokes in randomly selected directions from the center to the perimeter of a horizontal circle. The studies demonstrated that within a planar workspace, the usage of the trailing pattern depends on movement direction and the most frequently selected directions are those providing the opportunity to use the trailing pattern. Here, we studied whether the opportunity to use the preferred trailing pattern also depends on the orientation of the planar workspace. The free-stroke drawing task was performed with unconstrained arm movements within circles of a left-diagonal (LD) and right-diagonal (RD) orientation. Two pronounced preferred directions were revealed in the LD condition, and they were the directions in which the trailing pattern was used. Directional preferences were less pronounced, and the trailing pattern was not observed in any directions in the RD condition. Also, subjects identified the RD condition as inconvenient. The results reinforce the previous finding of the propensity to use the trailing pattern during arm movements. They also suggest that orientations of the workspaces in manual activities should be designed to support the trailing pattern as a favored type of joint control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25912607     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4285-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  29 in total

1.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Hierarchical control of different elbow-wrist coordination patterns.

Authors:  N V Dounskaia; S P Swinnen; C B Walter; A J Spaepen; S M Verschueren
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Intersegmental dynamics shape joint coordination during catching in typically developing children but not in children with developmental coordination disorder.

Authors:  Michael J Asmussen; Eryk P Przysucha; Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Patterns of hypermetria and terminal cocontraction during point-to-point movements demonstrate independent action of trajectory and postural controllers.

Authors:  Robert A Scheidt; Claude Ghez; Supriya Asnani
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A minimum energy cost hypothesis for human arm trajectories.

Authors:  R M Alexander
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Two-phase strategy of controlling motor coordination determined by task performance optimality.

Authors:  Yury P Shimansky; Miya K Rand
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  The cost of moving optimally: kinematic path selection.

Authors:  Dinant A Kistemaker; Jeremy D Wong; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The role of intrinsic factors in control of arm movement direction: implications from directional preferences.

Authors:  Natalia Dounskaia; Jacob A Goble; Wanyue Wang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Directional biases reveal utilization of arm's biomechanical properties for optimization of motor behavior.

Authors:  Jacob A Goble; Yanxin Zhang; Yury Shimansky; Siddharth Sharma; Natalia V Dounskaia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Load emphasizes muscle effort minimization during selection of arm movement direction.

Authors:  Wanyue Wang; Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Strategy of arm movement control is determined by minimization of neural effort for joint coordination.

Authors:  Natalia Dounskaia; Yury Shimansky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 1.972

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.