Literature DB >> 9116080

A minimum energy cost hypothesis for human arm trajectories.

R M Alexander1.   

Abstract

Many tasks require the arm to move from its initial position to a specified target position, but leave us free to choose the trajectory between them. This paper presents and tests the hypothesis that trajectories are chosen to minimize metabolic energy costs. Costs are calculated for the range of possible trajectories, for movements between the end points used in previously published experiments. Calculated energy minimizing trajectories for a model with biarticular elbow muscles agree well with observed trajectories for fast movements. Good agreement is also obtained for slow movements if they are assumed to be performed by slower muscles. A model in which all muscles are uniarticular is less successful in predicting observed trajectories. The effects of loads and of reversing the direction of movement are investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9116080     DOI: 10.1007/s004220050324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  43 in total

1.  Sensory and intrinsic coordination of movement.

Authors:  D N Lee; C M Craig; M A Grealy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Modelling approaches in biomechanics.

Authors:  R McN Alexander
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Adaptation to sensory-motor reflex perturbations is blind to the source of errors.

Authors:  Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Reduction of metabolic cost during motor learning of arm reaching dynamics.

Authors:  Helen J Huang; Rodger Kram; Alaa A Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The acquisition and implementation of the smoothness maximization motion strategy is dependent on spatial accuracy demands.

Authors:  Ronen Sosnik; Tamar Flash; Bjoern Hauptmann; Avi Karni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Kinematics of point-to-point finger movements.

Authors:  E G Cruz; D G Kamper
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  How the required precision influences the way we intercept a moving object.

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Rouwen Cañal-Bruland; Robert J van Beers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Learning to be economical: the energy cost of walking tracks motor adaptation.

Authors:  James M Finley; Amy J Bastian; Jinger S Gottschall
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Influence of workspace constraints on directional preferences of 3D arm movements.

Authors:  Wanyue Wang; Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Grasping objects with environmentally induced position uncertainty.

Authors:  Vassilios N Christopoulos; Paul R Schrater
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.