Literature DB >> 23203419

Two-phase strategy of controlling motor coordination determined by task performance optimality.

Yury P Shimansky1, Miya K Rand.   

Abstract

A quantitative model of optimal coordination between hand transport and grip aperture has been derived in our previous studies of reach-to-grasp movements without utilizing explicit knowledge of the optimality criterion or motor plant dynamics. The model's utility for experimental data analysis has been demonstrated. Here we show how to generalize this model for a broad class of reaching-type, goal-directed movements. The model allows for measuring the variability of motor coordination and studying its dependence on movement phase. The experimentally found characteristics of that dependence imply that execution noise is low and does not affect motor coordination significantly. From those characteristics it is inferred that the cost of neural computations required for information acquisition and processing is included in the criterion of task performance optimality as a function of precision demand for state estimation and decision making. The precision demand is an additional optimized control variable that regulates the amount of neurocomputational resources activated dynamically. It is shown that an optimal control strategy in this case comprises two different phases. During the initial phase, the cost of neural computations is significantly reduced at the expense of reducing the demand for their precision, which results in speed-accuracy tradeoff violation and significant inter-trial variability of motor coordination. During the final phase, neural computations and thus motor coordination are considerably more precise to reduce the cost of errors in making a contact with the target object. The generality of the optimal coordination model and the two-phase control strategy is illustrated on several diverse examples.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23203419     DOI: 10.1007/s00422-012-0537-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  6 in total

1.  Two-phase strategy of neural control for planar reaching movements: II--relation to spatiotemporal characteristics of movement trajectory.

Authors:  Miya K Rand; Yury P Shimansky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of auditory feedback on movements with two-segment sequence and eye-hand coordination.

Authors:  Miya K Rand
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Two-phase strategy of neural control for planar reaching movements: I. XY coordination variability and its relation to end-point variability.

Authors:  Miya K Rand; Yury P Shimansky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Strategy of arm movement control is determined by minimization of neural effort for joint coordination.

Authors:  Natalia Dounskaia; Yury Shimansky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Delay of gaze fixation during reaching movement with the non-dominant hand to a distant target.

Authors:  Miya K Rand; Shannon D R Ringenbach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Influence of workspace constraints on directional preferences of 3D arm movements.

Authors:  Wanyue Wang; Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.