Anita D Misra-Hebert1, Andrew Rabovsky2, Chen Yan3, Bo Hu4, Michael B Rothberg5. 1. Center for Value-Based Care Research, Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. Electronic address: misraa@ccf.org. 2. Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio. 3. Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. 4. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. 5. Center for Value-Based Care Research, Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Interprofessional team-based models of primary care delivery may improve efficiency and increase patient-centered time with the physician. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the effect of a new team-based primary care delivery model implemented in our health system on physician-patient face-to-face time and patient experience of the visit compared with usual care. METHODS: We conducted time-motion analyses of ambulatory visits with 20 primary care physicians across 8 practice sites in our health system from June through August 2014. Ten physicians practicing in the team-based model and 10 physicians practicing usual care at the same practice sites were included. The time that the physician was in the room and the duration of physician-patient face-to-face interaction were measured. After each visit, patients answered questions regarding satisfaction with their visit. RESULTS: A total of 98 patient visits were observed (44 in the team-based model and 54 in usual care). Total time that the physician and patient spent together at the visit did not differ significantly between the models. However, total duration of face-to-face interaction and proportion of the visit spent in face-to-face interaction were significantly greater in the team-based model. Patient satisfaction did not differ between the 2 models. CONCLUSIONS: A team-based model of primary care delivery increased physician-patient face-to-face time during the office visit, but did not affect patient satisfaction.
BACKGROUND: Interprofessional team-based models of primary care delivery may improve efficiency and increase patient-centered time with the physician. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the effect of a new team-based primary care delivery model implemented in our health system on physician-patient face-to-face time and patient experience of the visit compared with usual care. METHODS: We conducted time-motion analyses of ambulatory visits with 20 primary care physicians across 8 practice sites in our health system from June through August 2014. Ten physicians practicing in the team-based model and 10 physicians practicing usual care at the same practice sites were included. The time that the physician was in the room and the duration of physician-patient face-to-face interaction were measured. After each visit, patients answered questions regarding satisfaction with their visit. RESULTS: A total of 98 patient visits were observed (44 in the team-based model and 54 in usual care). Total time that the physician and patient spent together at the visit did not differ significantly between the models. However, total duration of face-to-face interaction and proportion of the visit spent in face-to-face interaction were significantly greater in the team-based model. Patient satisfaction did not differ between the 2 models. CONCLUSIONS: A team-based model of primary care delivery increased physician-patient face-to-face time during the office visit, but did not affect patient satisfaction.
Authors: David J Meyers; Alyna T Chien; Kevin H Nguyen; Zhonghe Li; Sara J Singer; Meredith B Rosenthal Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Elizabeth R Pfoh; Sandra Hong; Laura Baranek; Michael B Rothberg; Sarah Beinkampen; Anita D Misra-Hebert; Susan J Rehm; Andrea L Sikon Journal: Med Care Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Chen Yan; Susannah Rose; Michael B Rothberg; Mary Beth Mercer; Kenneth Goodman; Anita D Misra-Hebert Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-04-29 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Edward R Melnick; Shawn Y Ong; Allan Fong; Vimig Socrates; Raj M Ratwani; Bidisha Nath; Michael Simonov; Anup Salgia; Brian Williams; Daniel Marchalik; Richard Goldstein; Christine A Sinsky Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2021-07-14 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Xiaowei Yan; Walter F Stewart; Hannah Husby; Jake Delatorre-Reimer; Satish Mudiganti; Farah Refai; Andrew Hudnut; Kevin Knobel; Karen MacDonald; Frangiscos Sifakis; James B Jones Journal: Healthcare (Basel) Date: 2021-12-31