Literature DB >> 34901752

COVID-Related Stress and Work Intentions in a Sample of US Health Care Workers.

Christine A Sinsky1, Roger L Brown2, Martin J Stillman3, Mark Linzer3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate relationships between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related stress and work intentions in a sample of US health care workers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 1 and December 31, 2020, health care workers were surveyed for fear of viral exposure or transmission, COVID-19-related anxiety or depression, work overload, burnout, and intentions to reduce hours or leave their jobs.
RESULTS: Among 20,665 respondents at 124 institutions (median organizational response rate, 34%), intention to reduce hours was highest among nurses (33.7%; n=776), physicians (31.4%; n=2914), and advanced practice providers (APPs; 28.9%; n=608) while lowest among clerical staff (13.6%; n=242) and administrators (6.8%; n=50; all P<.001). Burnout (odds ratio [OR], 2.15; 95% CI, 1.93 to 2.38), fear of exposure, COVID-19-related anxiety/depression, and workload were independently related to intent to reduce work hours within 12 months (all P<.01). Intention to leave one's practice within 2 years was highest among nurses (40.0%; n=921), APPs (33.0%; n=694), other clinical staff (29.4%; n=718), and physicians (23.8%; n=2204) while lowest among administrators (12.6%; n=93; all P<.001). Burnout (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 2.29 to 2.88), fear of exposure, COVID-19-related anxiety/depression, and workload were predictors of intent to leave. Feeling valued by one's organization was protective of reducing hours (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.72) and intending to leave (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.45; all P<.01).
CONCLUSION: Approximately 1 in 3 physicians, APPs, and nurses surveyed intend to reduce work hours. One in 5 physicians and 2 in 5 nurses intend to leave their practice altogether. Reducing burnout and improving a sense of feeling valued may allow health care organizations to better maintain their workforces postpandemic.
© 2021 THE AUTHORS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AMA, American Medical Association; APP, advanced practice provider; IRB, Institutional Review Board; MAR/MCAR, missing at random vs missing completely at random; OR, odds ratio

Year:  2021        PMID: 34901752      PMCID: PMC8651505          DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 2542-4548


The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic placed unprecedented stresses on health care workers with work overload, job insecurity, worries about personal and family safety, and exposure to patients dying at unaccustomed rates. Early reports regarding physicians and/or nurses in Wuhan, China,, Israel, Italy,, and the United States6, 7, 8, 9 reported high levels of anxiety, depression, and/or sleep disturbances. A single-institution study of frontline workers found that 39% had symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and/or anxiety. Still, there is scarce knowledge about the consequences of COVID-19 for maintenance of the health care workforce. Unlike many previous crises, the COVID-19 pandemic has persisted for more than a year, raising concerns about the impact of the pandemic on occupational stress (burnout), mental health (anxiety and depression), and work intentions of US health care workers. A study of physicians in 2017 demonstrated that burnout is associated with higher rates of intention to reduce clinical effort, leave current practice, or leave medicine altogether. Longitudinal studies have found that burnout among physicians is associated with 1.5 to 2 times the likelihood of leaving an organization within 2 years.11, 12, 13, 14 It is estimated that turnover and reduced clinical hours due to physician burnout in the United States cost $4.6 billion annually., Nurses with symptoms of burnout have been found to have greater absenteeism and poor work performance. Stressful work environments and burnout are among the top 5 reasons nurses give for leaving their jobs. It is thus timely to study work intentions of clinicians as we are well into the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of our study is to evaluate the work intentions of US health care workers, including physicians, advanced practice providers (APPs), nurses, and other clinical role types, along with clerical workers, housekeepers, and administrators. We hypothesized that stress, burnout, and the factors that could lead to them (anxiety and depressive symptoms, fear of exposure or transmission, and work overload) would be associated with greater intention to reduce work hours or leave current practice. Additionally, we sought to determine factors associated with lower rates of intention to reduce hours or leave, including feeling valued by one’s organization, and an enhanced sense of meaning and purpose.

Methods

Study Design and Participants

The Coping With COVID study has been described in detail elsewhere. In brief, a survey of health care workers in both clinical and nonclinical roles was administered by multiple health care organizations across 30 states in both rural and urban settings at no cost beginning April 2020. Approximately 100 organizations, many of which had previously worked on well-being initiatives with the American Medical Association, were initially invited to participate. Others learned of the survey through American Medical Association news stories or academic presentations. Registration was available at a publicly available website and open to any organization with more than 100 physicians. The current study includes data collected between July 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020. Resident physicians were excluded from this analysis because their clinical hours and likelihood of leaving current practice are largely determined by progression through their training program. The APPs, including nurse practitioners and physician assistants, were included; these are clinicians who practice alongside physicians, with more limited training and oftentimes with a more limited scope of care. Prior articles have addressed 2373 physicians surveyed April 4 to May 27, 2020, and 20,947 health care workers surveyed between May and October 2020 but have not addressed intent to leave or reduce work hours, questions that were added to our survey June 24, 2020. Each institution determined the frequency of reminder emails. Responses were returned to a databank at Forward Health Group, in Madison, Wisconsin. The Hennepin Healthcare Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the University of Illinois-Chicago IRB both deemed this study a quality improvement/program evaluation project that was exempt from IRB requirements.

Survey

The Coping With COVID survey, reported elsewhere, includes demographic items (race/ethnicity, sex, years in practice, outpatient vs inpatient physician, and work role) and single-item questions on overall stress (referred to as COVID stress), burnout, fear of infection and transmission, perceived anxiety or depression, work overload, sense of meaning and purpose, and feeling valued by one’s organization. These are included in the Supplemental Appendix (available online at https://mcpiqojournal.org) and were scored on 5-point scales with the top 2 categories considered as “high stress” or “high fear.” Burnout was assessed using the Mini Z single-item burnout measure, which has been validated against the emotional exhaustion subscale of the Maslach Burnout Inventory.20, 21, 22 Construct validity was assessed with internal consistency measures and with correlations with the validated burnout score. Items from a previous national physician survey were modified for use to assess work intentions as follows: “What is the likelihood that you will reduce the number of hours you devote to clinical care over the next 12 months?” and “What is the likelihood that you would leave your practice within 2 years?,” with response options of “none,” “slight,” “moderate,” “likely,” and “definitely.” Responses of “moderately," “likely,” and “definitely” were considered likely to reduce hours or leave practice. This is concordant with definitions used in many,,, although not all, prior articles. The COVID-19 load was measured by the daily new cases per 100,000 people (7-day moving average) per organization location by county obtained from July 1 to December 31, 2020.

Statistical Analyses

Initially, descriptive statistics were run on all variables, and missing data were analyzed for MAR/MCAR (missing at random vs missing completely at random). A 2-level (respondents nested in organizations) multiple logistic regression analysis was performed on the subsample of physicians, APPs, and nurses (n=11,306) to identify variables associated with intent to reduce clinical work in the next 12 months and/or leave their current practice position in the next 24 months. We used mixed-effects logistic regression for modeling observations in the same organizations because they share common cluster-level random effects. Variables measured on 4-point Likert scales were treated as binary, with responses of “moderately” and “to a great extent” considered positive. Three adjusting covariates were also included in the models: (1) COVID-19 load, described previously, was treated as a continuous variable; (2) sex, as a binary variable, to use only males and females; and (3) a binary variable for persons of color, including African Americans, Latinx, Asian, Native American, and those endorsing “other” vs Caucasian. Analyses were performed using Stata, version 17 (StataCorp; 2021).

Results

A total of 3% missing data for the entire sample was detected. Based on Little’s test for MCAR on the outcome and predictor variables, we were able to accept the assumption of MCAR (missing completely at random) in the data; χ2=35.46 (df=26); P=.1019. Due to MCAR and the large sample size, imputation was not considered and listwise deletion was used. The median organizational response rate was 34%. The demographic characteristics of health care workers in our sample of 124 institutions are shown in Table 1. Of the 20,665 respondents, 60.41% (n=12,484) were women and 31.01% (n=6408) were men, with 8.37% (n=1730) preferring not to identify sex and 0.21% (n=43) identifying as nonbinary. Race/ethnicity distribution was 69.83% (n=14,431) white, 10.86% (n=2245) Asian/Pacific Islander, 2.04% (n=422) black, 3.3% (n=681) Hispanic, and 11.98% (n=2475) preferring not to identify their race or ethnicity. Physicians represented 44.84% (n=9266) of respondents; nurses, 11.14% (n=2302); APPs, 10.17% (n=2101); other clinical roles such as medical and nursing assistants, social workers, respiratory therapists, and physical therapists, 11.83% (n=2445); and administrators, 3.57% (n=738); with a small proportion represented by housekeeping and food service (0.53%; n=110).
Table 1

Personal and Professional Characteristics of Responding Health Care Workers

Personal CharacteristicN=20,665%
Race/ethnicity
 Prefer not to answer247512.0
 White/Caucasian14,43169.8
 Hispanic/Latino6813.30
 Black/African American4222.0
 Native American or American Indian540.3
 Asian/Pacific Islander224510.9
 Other (please specify)3571.7
Sex
 Prefer not to answer17308.4
 Male640831.0
 Female12,48460.4
 Nonbinary/third gender430.2
Years in practice
 1-5432020.9
 6-10363917.6
 11-15301714.6
 16-20228511.1
 <20555226.9
 APP18529.0
Setting
 Missing341516.5
 Inpatient910944.1
 Outpatient814139.4
Role type grouping
 Physicians (nonresident)926644.84
 APP210110.17
 Nurses230211.14
 Other clinical (therapists, laboratory technicians, medical assistants, nursing assistants)244511.83
 Clerical roles (receptionist/scheduler)17788.60
 Administrators (finance, information technology, researcher)7383.57
 Housekeeping/food service1100.53
 Other19259.32

APP, advanced practice provider.

Personal and Professional Characteristics of Responding Health Care Workers APP, advanced practice provider. Rates of high stress, fear of exposure of self or family, increased anxiety/depression related to COVID-19, high workload, feeling burned out, feeling valued by one’s organization, and feeling an enhanced sense of purpose by being a part of the COVID-19 response by role type are reported in Table 2. Burnout was reported in 48% (4438/9266) of physicians and 63% (1451/2301) of nurses. Forty-three percent (1001/2301) of nurses described anxiety or depression, and 56% (n=1288) noted work overload. Feeling valued, a burnout mitigator,, was present about half the time, though in some groups it was closer to one third.
Table 2

Stress Factors, Mitigators, and Intention to Leave Current Position, by Health Care Worker Rolea

Stress Factors
Mitigators
Outcomes
High Stress, no. (%)Fear Exposure or Transmission, no. (%)Anxiety or Depression, no. (%)High Work Load, no. (%)Burned Out, no. (%)Feeling Valued, no. (%)Enhanced Purpose, no. (%)Intent to Leave, no. (%)bIntent to Reduce Hours, no. (%)c
Physician n=9266 (44.8%)3125 (33.7)5322 (57.4)2385 (25.7)3670 (39.6)4438 (47.9)4661 (50.3)3300 (35.6)2204 (23.8)2914 (31.4)
Advanced practice provider n=2101 (10.2%)685 (32.6)1233 (58.7)737 (35.1)866 (41.2)1129 (53.7)882 (42.0)694 (33.0)694 (33.0)608 (28.9)
Nurse n=2,301 (11.1%)861 (37.4)1460 (63.4)1001 (43.5)1288 (56.0)1451 (63.1)701 (30.5)728 (31.6)921 (40.0)776 (33.7)
Other clinical roles n=2445 (11.1%)843 (34.5)1475 (60.3)1035 (42.3)1244 (50.9)1435 (58.7)863 (35.3)894 (36.6)718 (29.4)657 (26.9)
Clerical roles n=1778 (8.6%)598 (33.6)988 (55.6)671 (37.7)868 (48.8)878 (49.4)792 (44.5)707 (39.8)379 (21.3)242 (13.6)
Administrator n=738 (3.6%)193 (26.2)394 (53.4)249 (33.7)287 (38.9)323 (43.8)372 (50.4)194 (26.3)93 (12.6)50 (6.8)
Housekeeper n=110 (0.5%)19 (17.3)53 (48.2)34 (30.9)43 (39.1)45 (40.9)41 (37.3)42 (38.2)26 (23.6)21 (19.0)
Other n=1925 (9.3%)569 (29.6)1065 (55.3)666 (34.6)787 (40.9)892 (46.3)810 (42.1)648 (33.7)474 (24.6)347 (18.0)

N=20,665. Other clinical roles include therapists, laboratory technicians, medical assistants, and nursing assistants. Clerical roles includes receptionists and schedulers.

Percentage of all respondents within a role type who expressed an intention to leave.

Percentage of all respondents within a role type who expressed an intention to reduce work hours.

Stress Factors, Mitigators, and Intention to Leave Current Position, by Health Care Worker Rolea N=20,665. Other clinical roles include therapists, laboratory technicians, medical assistants, and nursing assistants. Clerical roles includes receptionists and schedulers. Percentage of all respondents within a role type who expressed an intention to leave. Percentage of all respondents within a role type who expressed an intention to reduce work hours. Work plans of surveyed health care workers are portrayed in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Work intentions of US health care workers by role and presence or absence of burnout (N=20,665). APP, advanced practice provider.

Work intentions of US health care workers by role and presence or absence of burnout (N=20,665). APP, advanced practice provider. With respect to the likelihood of reducing clinical work hours in the next 12 months, 33.7% (776/2301) of nurses, 31.4% (2914/9266) of physicians, 28.9% (608/2101) of APPs, 13.6% (242/1778) in clerical roles, and 6.8% (50/738) of administrators reported it was “moderately,” “likely,” or “definite” that they would reduce work hours in the next 12 months. With respect to the likelihood of leaving current practice in the next 24 months, 40.0% (921/2301) of nurses, 33.0% (694/2101) of APPs, 23.8% (2204/9266) of physicians, 21.3% (379/1778) of those in clerical roles, and 12.6% (93/738) of administrators indicated it was “moderately,” “likely,” or “definite” they would leave their current practice within the next 2 years.

Multilevel Multivariable Analyses

In the multilevel (respondents nested within organizations) multiple logistic regression analysis for the subset of physicians, APPs, and nurses, we sought to identify variables associated with intent to reduce work hours or leave current practice (Table 3). After adjusting for COVID-19 exposure, respondent race, sex, and years in practice, physicians, APPs, and nurses who were burned out (odds ratio [OR], 2.15; 95% CI, 1.93 to 2.38), in practice more than 20 years (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.46 to 1.76), had greater fear of exposure/transmission (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.42), had high reported rates of anxiety/depression (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.39), or endorsed high or very high workload (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.20 to 1.47) had significantly greater intentions to reduce work hours in the next 12 months. In contrast, those who felt highly valued by their organization (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.72) were less likely to intend to reduce work in the next 12 months.
Table 3

Multivariable Multilevel Analysis of Predictor Variables for Intent to Reduce Work Hours or Leave the Current Practice in Subset of Physicians, APPs, and Nurses

Intent to Reduce Hours (n=11,306)Organizations = 124
Intent to Leave Practice (n=11,306)Organizations = 124
OR95% CI
POR95% CI
P
LowerUpperLowerUpper
Years
 >201.601.461.76<.012.632.372.91<.01
Stress
 High1.231.111.36<.011.371.221.53<.01
Fear
 High1.291.181.42<.011.161.051.29<.01
Anxiety/depression
 High1.251.131.39<.011.321.181.47<.01
Workload
 High1.331.201.47<.011.231.101.37<.01
Burnout
 High2.151.932.38<.012.572.292.88<.01
Valued
 High0.650.590.72<.010.400.360.45<.01
Purpose
 High0.920.831.01.080.850.770.95<.01
People of color
 People of color0.970.871.09.710.750.660.86<.01
Sex
 Female0.900.820.99.030.870.790.97.01
 COVID-19 load0.990.991.00.620.990.991.00.62
 McKelvey & Zavoina pseudo R20.140.27
 Intraclass correlation coefficient0.0140.051

APP, advanced practice provider; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; OR, odds ratio.

Multivariable Multilevel Analysis of Predictor Variables for Intent to Reduce Work Hours or Leave the Current Practice in Subset of Physicians, APPs, and Nurses APP, advanced practice provider; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; OR, odds ratio. Similarly, physicians, APPs, and nurses who were in practice more than 20 years (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 2.37 to 2.91), burned out (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 2.29 to 2.88), had high fear of exposure/transmission (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.29), had high anxiety/depression (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.47), or endorsed high workload (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.37) or COVID-related stress (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.22 to 1.53) were more likely to intend to leave their practice within the next 24 months. In contrast, those who felt highly valued by their organization (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.45) or a strong sense of meaning and purpose in their work (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.95) were less likely to intend to leave their practice within the next 24 months (Table 3). As shown in Figure 2, burnout and feeling valued are both strongly related to work intentions, in opposite directions.
Figure 2

Relationship between burnout, feeling valued by one’s organization, and work intentions of US physicians, advanced practice providers (APPs), and nurses (N = 11,306). No burnout = “enjoy my work, no symptoms of burnout,” “under stress, less energy, but I don’t feel burned out.” Yes burnout = “beginning to burn out,” symptoms won’t go away,” “completely burned out.” No “feeling valued” = “not at all” or “somewhat.” Yes “feeling valued” = “moderately” or “to a great extent.”

Relationship between burnout, feeling valued by one’s organization, and work intentions of US physicians, advanced practice providers (APPs), and nurses (N = 11,306). No burnout = “enjoy my work, no symptoms of burnout,” “under stress, less energy, but I don’t feel burned out.” Yes burnout = “beginning to burn out,” symptoms won’t go away,” “completely burned out.” No “feeling valued” = “not at all” or “somewhat.” Yes “feeling valued” = “moderately” or “to a great extent.” COVID-19 load was not associated with intention to reduce clinical hours or leave the practice. Female workers (physicians, APPs, or RNs) were significantly less likely to intend to reduce hours or leave the practice, whereas persons of color were significantly less likely to leave the practice but not reduce hours. The overall pseudo R or percent of variance explained by the model to predict intent to reduce work hours was 14%, and for intent to leave practice, was 27%.

Discussion

In this national study of 20,655 health care workers across multiple role types, we found that approximately one-third of physicians, APPs, and nurses intend to reduce work hours in the next 12 months. Furthermore, 1 of 5 physicians and 2 of 5 nurses are moderately likely or higher to leave their current practice within 2 years. Because multiple studies have demonstrated that intent to leave among physicians correlates with actual departures,27, 28, 29 these findings are of concern. Costs of replacing health care workers are also substantial. Replacing a nurse may cost up to 1.2 to 1.3 times their annual salary., Replacing physicians may cost $250,000 to more than $1.0 million per physician.,, The aggregate cost of physicians reducing or cutting back attributable to burnout alone is estimated at $4.6 billion annually in the United States. Additional excessive health care costs are borne by payers in the first year after patients lose their primary care physicians for any reason. Higher levels of burnout, stress, workload, fear of infection, anxiety/depression due to COVID-19, and years in practice are each associated with greater intention to reduce work hours and leave one’s current practice. In contrast, feeling highly valued by one’s organization is associated with lower such intentions. To our surprise, COVID-19 load by county was not associated with intent to reduce work hours or leave current practice, although individual exposure to COVID-19 was not determined in the current study. Our findings have implications for the adequacy of the US health care workforce. Nurses, physicians, and APPs are at highest risk for intention to reduce clinical work hours or leave their current practice. Prior literature has shown that approximately 25% to 35% of physicians who express intention to leave carry out that intention within 2 to 3 years.,, It would be challenging during ordinary times and even more so were there to be further COVID-19 surges, if a substantial portion of the 40.0% (921/2301) of nurses and 23.8% (2204/9266) of physicians who expressed an intention to leave left their positions. A recent post in the management sphere predicts a “tsunami” of workers leaving their roles when the pandemic ends. In their survey of non–health care workers, one half are seeking other jobs and 25% say they will quit their jobs. They refer to this as “pent-up turnover.” The US health care system may face a similar workforce shortage post–COVID-19 due to such pent-up intentions. Our study provides health care leaders guidance as they consider interventions to improve workforce retention. To meet the societal need for medical care in the future, it will be necessary not only to train new health care workers but also to address attrition in the current health care workforce. A comprehensive approach by national policy makers and health care delivery institutions will be necessary to address this challenge.35, 36, 37, 38, 39 Here, we briefly mention potential approaches for some of the key factors associated with intent to reduce hours or leave. Stress and burnout: leaders can focus on providing adequate personal protective equipmen, creating supportive environments,, ensuring access to confidential services for mental health, and reducing work overload through better teamwork.42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 Applying a syst0ems approach to interventions, aimed at improving organizational culture, and practice efficiency,,49, 50, 51, 52 will be most successful at reducing burnout. Feeling valued by one’s organization: this was associated with less intent to reduce hours or leave one’s job. Mechanisms to enhance health care workers' sense of value are needed. Transparent communication, support for child care, and rapid training to support deployment to unfamiliar units may demonstrate organizational appreciation to workers.53, 54, 55, 56 Our cross-sectional study is subject to a number of limitations, including inability to determine cause and effect. The median organizational response rate was 34%. Test-retest reliability is not known for the Coping With COVID survey. Because organizations surveyed their own health care workforces, we do not have information on response rates by role. Many survey items were single-item measures that are typically not as robust psychometrically as multi-item measures. We do not know how many health care workers who indicate an intent to cut back or leave current practice will carry out these intentions. Our sample is a convenience sample and to the extent that it may be overrepresented by organizations that had been active in addressing system factors that affect well-being pre-pandemic, we may be underestimating the scope of the problem with health care workers’ intent to leave or cut back. Finally, without a measure of individual COVID-19 exposure, we may be underestimating the impact of exposure when we controlled for COVID-19 load.

Conclusion

Approximately one-third of physicians of physicians and nurses intend to reduce work hours in the next 12 months. Furthermore, 1 in 5 physicians and 2 in 5 nurses intend to leave their current practice within 2 years. If these clinicians follow through on these intentions, this has significant implications for the future health care workforce. Burnout, workload, and COVID-19–associated stresses were associated with intent to reduce hours or leave, whereas feeling valued was strongly associated with lower odds of reducing hours or leaving. Future research should investigate whether addressing predictors of burnout and emphasizing mitigators such as positive organizational cultures and making workers feel valued could avert a potential health care workforce crisis in the wake of COVID-19.
  46 in total

1.  No exit: an evaluation of measures of physician attrition.

Authors:  Diane R Rittenhouse; Elizabeth Mertz; Dennis Keane; Kevin Grumbach
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Revisiting nurse turnover costs: adjusting for inflation.

Authors:  Cheryl Bland Jones
Journal:  J Nurs Adm       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.737

3.  Relationships between job satisfaction, intentions to leave family practice and actually leaving among family physicians in England.

Authors:  Mark Hann; David Reeves; Bonnie Sibbald
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 3.367

4.  Cross-sectional survey of workplace stressors associated with physician burnout measured by the Mini-Z and the Maslach Burnout Inventory.

Authors:  Kristine Olson; Christine Sinsky; Seppo T Rinne; Theodore Long; Ronald Vender; Sandip Mukherjee; Michael Bennick; Mark Linzer
Journal:  Stress Health       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  A Team-Based Care Model That Improves Job Satisfaction.

Authors:  Corey Lyon; Aimee F English; Peter Chabot Smith
Journal:  Fam Pract Manag       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr

6.  Powering-Up Primary Care Teams: Advanced Team Care With In-Room Support.

Authors:  Christine A Sinsky; Thomas Bodenheimer
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  A Team-based Model of Primary Care Delivery and Physician-patient Interaction.

Authors:  Anita D Misra-Hebert; Andrew Rabovsky; Chen Yan; Bo Hu; Michael B Rothberg
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Practice And Policy Reset Post-COVID-19: Reversion, Transition, Or Transformation?

Authors:  Christine Sinsky; Mark Linzer
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Working conditions in primary care: physician reactions and care quality.

Authors:  Mark Linzer; Linda Baier Manwell; Eric S Williams; James A Bobula; Roger L Brown; Anita B Varkey; Bernice Man; Julia E McMurray; Ann Maguire; Barbara Horner-Ibler; Mark D Schwartz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Establishing Crosswalks Between Common Measures of Burnout in US Physicians.

Authors:  Keri J S Brady; Pengsheng Ni; Lindsey Carlasare; Tait D Shanafelt; Christine A Sinsky; Mark Linzer; Martin Stillman; Mickey T Trockel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  18 in total

1.  Don't Take It Lying Down-Vocation as an Antidote to Weltschmerz.

Authors:  T Aaron Zeller
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2022-06-13

2.  Leadership Diversity and Development in the Nation's Cancer Centers.

Authors:  Caryn Lerman; Chanita Hughes-Halbert; Mary Falcone; David M Gosky; Roy A Jensen; Kelvin P Lee; Edith Mitchell; Kunle Odunsi; Jennifer W Pegher; Elisa Rodriguez; Yolanda Sanchez; Reuben Shaw; George Weiner; Cheryl L Willman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 11.816

3.  The 2013 to 2019 Emergency Medicine Workforce: Clinician Entry and Attrition Across the US Geography.

Authors:  Cameron J Gettel; D Mark Courtney; Alexander T Janke; Craig Rothenberg; Angela M Mills; Wendy Sun; Arjun K Venkatesh
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.762

4.  Childcare Stress, Burnout, and Intent to Reduce Hours or Leave the Job During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among US Health Care Workers.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Harry; Lindsey E Carlasare; Christine A Sinsky; Roger L Brown; Elizabeth Goelz; Nancy Nankivil; Mark Linzer
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-07-01

5.  Elements Influencing Recruitment and Retention of Millennial Hospitalists Born in or after 1982: a Survey-Based Study.

Authors:  Amteshwar Singh; Tiffani Panek; Sean Tackett; Suchitra Paranji; Venkat Gundareddy; Regina Kauffman; Scott Wright; Gregory Bowling; Haruka Torok; Hemali Patel; Ilan Alhadeff; Masayuki Nogi; Thomas McIlraith; Thomas Robertson; Flora Kisuule
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 6.473

6.  We need to talk about Covid-19 pandemic related stress.

Authors:  Samilia Obeng-Gyasi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2022-05-29       Impact factor: 3.125

7.  "Community engagement via restorative justice to build equity-oriented crisis standards of care".

Authors:  Ruby Long; Emily C Cleveland Manchanda; Annette M Dekker; Liliya Kraynov; Susan Willson; Pedro Flores; Elizabeth A Samuels; Karin Rhodes
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.739

8.  Supporting Careers of Women in Clinical Immunology: From Conceptualization to Implementation.

Authors:  Victoria R Dimitriades; Alexandra F Freeman; Sarah E Henrickson; Roshini S Abraham
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.418

9.  Low rates of HPV vaccination and cervical cancer screening: Challenges and opportunities in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Debi L Smith; Rebecca B Perkins
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.637

10.  Pain Management Providers in the Era of COVID-19: Who is Taking Care of Those Who Provide Care?

Authors:  Gabriela Toutin Dias; Michael E Schatman
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.