Literature DB >> 25910889

Laryngoscopy facilitates successful i-gel insertion by novice doctors: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Yu Miyazaki1, Nobuyasu Komasawa2, Sayuri Matsunami1, Yusuke Kusaka1, Toshiaki Minami1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the hypothesis that the efficacy of insertion of the supraglottic device i-gel(®) (i-gel) can be improved by laryngoscopy and can provide better sealing pressure in anesthetized patients by novice doctors.
METHODS: Eighty-four adult patients were assigned to the laryngoscopy group (L group, 42 patients) or control group (i.e., conventional blind insertion; C group, 42 patients). Anesthesia was induced with propofol and remifentanil, and rocuronium 0.6-0.9 mg/kg was administered. The number of attempts until successful insertion, sealing pressure, vital sign changes upon insertion, and subjective difficulty of insertion by novice doctors were compared between the groups.
RESULTS: The total number of insertion attempts was one (L group 36 cases, C group 23 cases), two (L group 6 cases, C group 18 cases), and three (L group 0 case, C group 1 case), with significant differences between groups (P = 0.007). The sealing pressure was significantly higher in the L group than in the C group (L group 22.3 ± 2.6 cmH2O, C group 19.5 ± 2.7 cmH2O, P < 0.001). Vital sign changes (heart rate and blood pressure) did not differ between the two groups. The subjective difficulty of insertion was significantly lower in the L group than in the C group (L group 26.8 ± 11.8 mm, C group 47.0 ± 15.1 mm, P < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative pharyngeal pain was significantly lower in the L group than in the C group (P < 0.001), while the incidence of hoarseness did not differ between the two groups (P = 1.00).
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that laryngoscopy facilitates i-gel insertion by novice doctors, as reflected in the rate of successful insertions, higher sealing pressure, and lower subjective difficulty of insertion in anesthetized patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Insertion efficacy; Laryngoscopy; Novice doctors; Randomized controlled trial; i-gel®

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25910889     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-015-2016-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  26 in total

Review 1.  Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

Authors:  Robert W Neumar; Charles W Otto; Mark S Link; Steven L Kronick; Michael Shuster; Clifton W Callaway; Peter J Kudenchuk; Joseph P Ornato; Bryan McNally; Scott M Silvers; Rod S Passman; Roger D White; Erik P Hess; Wanchun Tang; Daniel Davis; Elizabeth Sinz; Laurie J Morrison
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Initial experience of the i-gel supraglottic airway by the residents in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Yukako Abukawa; Koichi Hiroki; Makoto Ozaki
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  A randomised crossover trial comparing the i-gel supraglottic airway and classic laryngeal mask airway.

Authors:  C Janakiraman; D B Chethan; A R Wilkes; M R Stacey; N Goodwin
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging study of the in vivo position of the extraglottic airway devices i-gel™ and LMA-Supreme™ in anaesthetized human volunteers.

Authors:  S G Russo; S Cremer; C Eich; M Jipp; J Cohnen; M Strack; M Quintel; A Mohr
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Laryngeal mask insertion with a laryngoscope in paediatric patients.

Authors:  T Elwood; R G Cox
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  Performance of the i-gel™ during pre-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  David Häske; Benjamin Schempf; Gernot Gaier; Christoph Niederberger
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2013-05-04       Impact factor: 5.262

7.  A prospective randomised comparison of two insertion methods for i-gel placement in anaesthetised paralysed patients: standard vs. rotational technique.

Authors:  H C Kim; D H Yoo; H J Kim; Y T Jeon; J W Hwang; H P Park
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  Intraocular pressure and haemodynamic responses to insertion of the i-gel, laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube.

Authors:  Salah A Ismail; Neama A Bisher; Hazem W Kandil; Hany A Mowafi; Hayam A Atawia
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Prewarming of the i-gel facilitates successful insertion and ventilation efficacy with muscle relaxation: a randomized study.

Authors:  Nobuyasu Komasawa; Isao Nishihara; Shinichi Tatsumi; Toshiaki Minami
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 9.452

10.  i-gel™ supraglottic airway in clinical practice: a prospective observational multicentre study.

Authors:  L Theiler; M Gutzmann; M Kleine-Brueggeney; N Urwyler; B Kaempfen; R Greif
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 9.166

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of the efficacy of six supraglottic devices for airway management in dark conditions: a crossover randomized simulation trial.

Authors:  Fumihiro Ohchi; Nobuyasu Komasawa; Kentaro Imagawa; Kaori Okamoto; Toshiaki Minami
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Evaluation of I-Gel™ versus Classic LMA™ for Airway Management by Paramedics and Medical Students: A Manikin Study.

Authors:  Ashish Kumar Kannaujia; Uma Srivastava; Tapas Singh; Rudrashish Haldar
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2020-06-22

3.  Comparison of Pressure Changes by Head and Neck Position between High-Volume Low-Pressure and Taper-Shaped Cuffs: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Nobuyasu Komasawa; Ryosuke Mihara; Kentaro Imagawa; Kazuo Hattori; Toshiaki Minami
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Canadian Airway Focus Group updated consensus-based recommendations for management of the difficult airway: part 1. Difficult airway management encountered in an unconscious patient.

Authors:  J Adam Law; Laura V Duggan; Mathieu Asselin; Paul Baker; Edward Crosby; Andrew Downey; Orlando R Hung; Philip M Jones; François Lemay; Rudiger Noppens; Matteo Parotto; Roanne Preston; Nick Sowers; Kathryn Sparrow; Timothy P Turkstra; David T Wong; George Kovacs
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.063

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.