Literature DB >> 25910870

Assessment Approach for Identifying Compatibility of Restoration Projects with Geomorphic and Flooding Processes in Gravel Bed Rivers.

Paul DeVries1, Robert Aldrich.   

Abstract

A critical requirement for a successful river restoration project in a dynamic gravel bed river is that it be compatible with natural hydraulic and sediment transport processes operating at the reach scale. The potential for failure is greater at locations where the influence of natural processes is inconsistent with intended project function and performance. We present an approach using practical GIS, hydrologic, hydraulic, and sediment transport analyses to identify locations where specific restoration project types have the greatest likelihood of working as intended because their function and design are matched with flooding and morphologic processes. The key premise is to identify whether a specific river analysis segment (length ~1-10 bankfull widths) within a longer reach is geomorphically active or inactive in the context of vertical and lateral stabilities, and hydrologically active for floodplain connectivity. Analyses involve empirical channel geometry relations, aerial photographic time series, LiDAR data, HEC-RAS hydraulic modeling, and a time-integrated sediment transport budget to evaluate trapping efficiency within each segment. The analysis segments are defined by HEC-RAS model cross sections. The results have been used effectively to identify feasible projects in a variety of alluvial gravel bed river reaches with lengths between 11 and 80 km and 2-year flood magnitudes between ~350 and 1330 m(3)/s. Projects constructed based on the results have all performed as planned. In addition, the results provide key criteria for formulating erosion and flood management plans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25910870     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-015-0518-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  6 in total

1.  Long-term effect of instream habitat-improvement structures on channel morphology along the Blackledge and Salmon rivers, Connecticut, USA.

Authors:  Douglas M Thompson
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Design and performance of a channel reconstruction project in a coastal California gravel-bed stream.

Authors:  G M Kondolf; M W Smeltzer; S F Railsback
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Post-project appraisals in adaptive management of river channel restoration.

Authors:  Peter W Downs; G Mathias Kondolf
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Did the pre-1980 use of in-stream structures improve streams? A reanalysis of historical data.

Authors:  Douglas M Thompson
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Projecting cumulative benefits of multiple river restoration projects: an example from the Sacramento-San Joaquin River system in California.

Authors:  G Mathias Kondolf; Paul L Angermeier; Kenneth Cummins; Thomas Dunne; Michael Healey; Wim Kimmerer; Peter B Moyle; Dennis Murphy; Duncan Patten; Steve Railsback; Denise J Reed; Robert Spies; Robert Twiss
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Distribution of salmon-habitat potential relative to landscape characteristics and implications for conservation.

Authors:  Kelly M Burnett; Gordon H Reeves; Daniel J Miller; Sharon Clarke; Ken Vance-Borland; Kelly Christiansen
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.657

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.