Literature DB >> 12071499

Post-project appraisals in adaptive management of river channel restoration.

Peter W Downs1, G Mathias Kondolf.   

Abstract

Post-project appraisals (PPAs) can evaluate river restoration schemes in relation to their compliance with design, their short-term performance attainment, and their longer-term geomorphological compatibility with the catchment hydrology and sediment transport processes. PPAs provide the basis for communicating the results of one restoration scheme to another, thereby improving future restoration designs. They also supply essential performance feedback needed for adaptive management, in which management actions are treated as experiments. PPAs allow river restoration success to be defined both in terms of the scheme attaining its performance objectives and in providing a significant learning experience. Different levels of investment in PPA, in terms of pre-project data and follow-up information, bring with them different degrees of understanding and tbus different abilities to gauge both types of success. We present four case studies to illustrate how the commitment to PPA has determined the understanding achieved in each case. In Moore's Gulch (California, USA), understanding was severely constrained by the lack of pre-project data and post-implementation monitoring. Pre-project data existed for the Kitswell Brook (Hertfordshire, UK), but the monitoring consisted only of one site visit and thus the understanding achieved is related primarily to design compliance issues. The monitoring undertaken for Deep Run (Maryland, USA) and the River Idle (Nottinghamshire, UK) enabled some understanding of the short-term performance of each scheme. The transferable understanding gained from each case study is used to develop an illustrative five-fold classification of geomorphological PPAs (full, medium-term, short-term, one-shot, and remains) according to their potential as learning experiences. The learning experience is central to adaptive management but rarely articulated in the literature. Here, we gauge the potential via superimposition onto a previous schematic representation of the adaptive management process by Haney and Power (1996). Using PPAs wisely can lead to cutting-edge, complex solutions to river restoration challenges.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12071499     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-001-0035-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  11 in total

1.  Initial adjustments within a new river channel: Interactions between fluvial processes, colonizing vegetation, and bank profile development.

Authors:  Angela M Gurnell; Ian P Morrissey; Angela J Boitsidis; Tony Bark; Nicholas J Clifford; Geoffrey E Petts; Kenneth Thompson
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Linking theory and practice for restoration of step-pool streams.

Authors:  Anne Chin; Shannah Anderson; Andrew Collison; Barbara J Ellis-Sugai; Jeffrey P Haltiner; Johan B Hogervorst; G Mathias Kondolf; Linda S O'Hirok; Alison H Purcell; Ann L Riley; Ellen Wohl
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  River restoration in Spain: theoretical and practical approach in the context of the European water framework directive.

Authors:  Marta González Del Tánago; Diego García de Jalón; Mercedes Román
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 4.  Restoring forest landscapes: important lessons learnt.

Authors:  Stephanie Mansourian; Daniel Vallauri
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Evaluating success criteria and project monitoring in river enhancement within an adaptive management framework.

Authors:  T Kevin O'Donnell; David L Galat
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Effective control of aquatic invasive species in tropical Australia.

Authors:  Stephanie Januchowski-Hartley; Jeremy VanDerWal; Damon Sydes
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Restoring ecological integrity in highly regulated rivers: the role of baseline data and analytical references.

Authors:  Peter W Downs; Maia S Singer; Bruce K Orr; Zooey E Diggory; Tamara C Church; J C Stella
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Assessment Approach for Identifying Compatibility of Restoration Projects with Geomorphic and Flooding Processes in Gravel Bed Rivers.

Authors:  Paul DeVries; Robert Aldrich
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  Adaptive Management as an Effective Strategy: Interdisciplinary Perceptions for Natural Resources Management.

Authors:  Lindsay M Dreiss; Jan-Michael Hessenauer; Lucas R Nathan; Kelly M O'Connor; Marjorie R Liberati; Danielle P Kloster; Janet R Barclay; Jason C Vokoun; Anita T Morzillo
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.266

10.  Flow Restoration in the Columbia River Basin: An Evaluation of a Flow Restoration Accounting Framework.

Authors:  Amy L McCoy; S Rankin Holmes; Brett A Boisjolie
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.266

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.