Literature DB >> 21176095

Zirconia in fixed implant prosthodontics.

Petra Christine Guess1, Wael Att, Joerg Rudolf Strub.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: CAD/CAM technology in combination with zirconia ceramic has increasingly gained popularity in implant dentistry.
PURPOSE: This narrative review presents the current knowledge on zirconia utilized as framework material for implant-borne restorations and implant abutments, laboratory tests and developments, clinical performance, and possible future trends for implant dentistry are addressed.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A review of available literature from 1990 through 2010 was conducted with search terms zirconia,""implants,""abutment,""crown," and "fixed dental prosthesis" using electronic databases (PubMed) and manual searching.
RESULTS: Latest applications of zirconia in implant dentistry include implant abutments, multiple unit and full-arch frameworks as well as custom-made bars to support fixed and removable prostheses. High biocompatibility, low bacterial surface adhesion as well as favorable chemical properties of zirconia ceramics are reported. Zirconia stabilized with yttrium oxide exhibits high flexural strength and fracture toughness due to a transformation toughening mechanism. Preliminary clinical data confirmed the high stability of zirconia for abutments and as a framework material for implant borne crowns and fixed dental prostheses. Zirconia abutment or framework damage has rarely been encountered. However, veneering porcelain fractures are the most common technical complication in implant-supported zirconia restorations. These porcelain veneer failures have led to concerns regarding differences in coefficient of thermal expansions between core and veneering porcelain and their respective processing techniques.
CONCLUSION: As presently evidence of clinical long-term data is missing, caution with regard to especially extensive implant-borne zirconia frameworks is recommended.
© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21176095     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00317.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  18 in total

1.  Three- to nine-year survival estimates and fracture mechanisms of zirconia- and alumina-based restorations using standardized criteria to distinguish the severity of ceramic fractures.

Authors:  Osvaldo D Moráguez; H W Anselm Wiskott; Susanne S Scherrer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Metal stain on monolithic zirconia restoration: A case report.

Authors:  Min-Sang Cha; Sang-Woon Lee; Yoon-Hyuk Huh; Lee-Ra Cho; Chan-Jin Park
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  Clinical outcomes of zirconia-based implant- and tooth-supported single crowns.

Authors:  Farahnaz Nejatidanesh; Hedayat Moradpoor; Omid Savabi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Clinical Advantages and Limitations of Monolithic Zirconia Restorations Full Arch Implant Supported Reconstruction: Case Series.

Authors:  Joao Carames; Loana Tovar Suinaga; Yung Cheng Paul Yu; Alejandro Pérez; Mary Kang
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2015-06-01

5.  Influence of core design, production technique, and material selection on fracture behavior of yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal fixed dental prostheses produced using different multilayer techniques: split-file, over-pressing, and manually built-up veneers.

Authors:  Deyar Jallal Hadi Mahmood; Ewa H Linderoth; Ann Wennerberg; Per Vult Von Steyern
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2016-02-12

6.  Compressive strength and the effect of duration after photo-activation among dual-cure bulk fill composite core materials.

Authors:  Fahad Alkhudhairy; Fahim Vohra
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

7.  Finite Element Analysis of Dental Implants with Zirconia Crown Restorations: Conventional Cement-Retained vs. Cementless Screw-Retained.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Lee; Ho Yeol Jang; Su Young Lee
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Rationale for the use of CAD/CAM technology in implant prosthodontics.

Authors:  Jaafar Abduo; Karl Lyons
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2013-04-16

9.  Evaluation of removal forces of implant-supported zirconia copings depending on abutment geometry, luting agent and cleaning method during re-cementation.

Authors:  Matthias Rödiger; Sven Rinke; Fenja Ehret-Kleinau; Franziska Pohlmeyer; Katharina Lange; Ralf Bürgers; Nikolaus Gersdorff
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 1.904

10.  Corrosion behavior of zirconia in acidulated phosphate fluoride.

Authors:  Anie Thomas; Sathyanarayanan Sridhar; Shant Aghyarian; Pilanda Watkins-Curry; Julia Y Chan; Alessandro Pozzi; Danieli C Rodrigues
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.