| Literature DB >> 25909212 |
Fábio César Miranda Torricelli1, Alexandre Danilovic1, Fábio Carvalho Vicentini1, Giovanni Scala Marchini1, Miguel Srougi2, Eduardo Mazzucchi2.
Abstract
The use of certain technical principles and the selection of favorable cases can optimize the results of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). The aim of this study is to review how ESWL works, its indications and contraindications, predictive factors for success, and its complications. A search was conducted on the Pubmed® database between January 1984 and October 2013 using "shock wave lithotripsy" and "stone" as key-words. Only articles with a high level of evidence, in English, and conducted in humans, such as clinical trials or review/meta-analysis, were included. To optimize the search for the ESWL results, several technical factors including type of lithotripsy device, energy and frequency of pulses, coupling of the patient to the lithotriptor, location of the calculus, and type of anesthesia should be taken into consideration. Other factors related to the patient, stone size and density, skin to stone distance, anatomy of the excretory path, and kidney anomalies are also important. Antibiotic prophylaxis is not necessary, and routine double J stent placement before the procedure is not routinely recommended. Alpha-blockers, particularly tamsulosin, are useful for stones >10mm. Minor complications may occur following ESWL, which generally respond well to clinical interventions. The relationship between ESWL and hypertension/diabetes is not well established.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25909212 DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.61.01.065
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ISSN: 0104-4230 Impact factor: 1.209