J V Roughan1, H G M J Bertrand1, H M Isles1. 1. Comparative Biology Centre, The Medical School, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inflammation is thought to be a major contributor to post-surgical pain, so non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used analgesics. However, compared to rats, considerably less is known as to how successfully these prevent pain in mice. METHODS: A fluorescent COX-2 selective probe was used for the first time to evaluate the post-surgical anti-inflammatory effects of meloxicam, and automated behaviour analyses (HomeCageScan; HCS), the Mouse Grimace Scale (MGS) and body weight changes to assess its pain-preventative properties. Groups of 8-9 BALB/c mice were subcutaneously injected with saline (0.3 mL) or meloxicam at (1, 5 or 20 mg/kg) 1 h before a 1.5-cm midline laparotomy. The probe or a control dye (2 mg/kg) was injected intravenously 3 h later. Imaging was used to quantify inflammation at 7, 24 and 48 h following surgery. HCS data and MGS scores were respectively obtained from video recordings and photographs before surgery and 24 h later. RESULTS: Post-surgical inflammation was dose dependently reduced by meloxicam; with 5 or 20 mg/kg being most effective compared to saline. However, all mice lost weight, MGS scores increased and behavioural activity was reduced by surgery for at least 24 h with no perceivable beneficial effect of meloxicam on any of these potentially pain-associated changes. CONCLUSIONS: Although meloxicam prevented inflammation, even large doses did not prevent post-laparotomy pain possibly arising due to a range of factors, including, but not limited to inflammation. MGS scoring can be applied by very naïve assessors and so should be effective for cage-side use.
BACKGROUND: Inflammation is thought to be a major contributor to post-surgical pain, so non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used analgesics. However, compared to rats, considerably less is known as to how successfully these prevent pain in mice. METHODS: A fluorescent COX-2 selective probe was used for the first time to evaluate the post-surgical anti-inflammatory effects of meloxicam, and automated behaviour analyses (HomeCageScan; HCS), the Mouse Grimace Scale (MGS) and body weight changes to assess its pain-preventative properties. Groups of 8-9 BALB/c mice were subcutaneously injected with saline (0.3 mL) or meloxicam at (1, 5 or 20 mg/kg) 1 h before a 1.5-cm midline laparotomy. The probe or a control dye (2 mg/kg) was injected intravenously 3 h later. Imaging was used to quantify inflammation at 7, 24 and 48 h following surgery. HCS data and MGS scores were respectively obtained from video recordings and photographs before surgery and 24 h later. RESULTS: Post-surgical inflammation was dose dependently reduced by meloxicam; with 5 or 20 mg/kg being most effective compared to saline. However, all mice lost weight, MGS scores increased and behavioural activity was reduced by surgery for at least 24 h with no perceivable beneficial effect of meloxicam on any of these potentially pain-associated changes. CONCLUSIONS: Although meloxicam prevented inflammation, even large doses did not prevent post-laparotomy pain possibly arising due to a range of factors, including, but not limited to inflammation. MGS scoring can be applied by very naïve assessors and so should be effective for cage-side use.
Authors: Lynn C Matsumiya; Robert E Sorge; Susana G Sotocinal; John M Tabaka; Jeffrey S Wieskopf; Austin Zaloum; Oliver D King; Jeffrey S Mogil Journal: J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 1.232
Authors: Irene L Llorente; Diego Pérez-Rodríguez; Taiana C Burgin; José M Gonzalo-Orden; Beatriz Martínez-Villayandre; Arsenio Fernández-López Journal: Brain Res Bull Date: 2013-02-28 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Matthew C Leach; Kristel Klaus; Amy L Miller; Maud Scotto di Perrotolo; Susana G Sotocinal; Paul A Flecknell Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-04-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Susana G Sotocinal; Robert E Sorge; Austin Zaloum; Alexander H Tuttle; Loren J Martin; Jeffrey S Wieskopf; Josiane C S Mapplebeck; Peng Wei; Shu Zhan; Shuren Zhang; Jason J McDougall; Oliver D King; Jeffrey S Mogil Journal: Mol Pain Date: 2011-07-29 Impact factor: 3.395
Authors: Kristina A Pugh; Kyle J Reitnauer; Robyn B Lee; William L Wilkins; John H McDonough; M Ross Pennington; Samantha R Litvin Journal: J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 1.232
Authors: Jennifer A Beninson; Jennifer L Lofgren; Patrick A Lester; Madeline M Hileman; Daniel J Berkowitz; Daniel D Myers Journal: J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 1.232
Authors: Ana Tada Fonseca Brasil Antiorio; Jilma Alemán-Laporte; Ana Paula Pauloni de Freitas; Pedro Kenzo Yamamoto; Luciana Cintra; Claudia Madalena Cabrera Mori Journal: Vet Res Commun Date: 2022-01-06 Impact factor: 2.459
Authors: Anna E Sarfaty; Caroline J Zeiss; Amy D Willis; Jorgen M Harris; Peter C Smith Journal: J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci Date: 2019-09-20 Impact factor: 1.232
Authors: Christopher H Emfinger; Zihan Yan; Alecia Welscher; Peter Hung; William McAllister; Paul W Hruz; Colin G Nichols; Maria S Remedi Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2018-09-18 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Brandon J Rea; Anne-Sophie Wattiez; Jayme S Waite; William C Castonguay; Chantel M Schmidt; Aaron M Fairbanks; Bennett R Robertson; Cameron J Brown; Bianca N Mason; Maria-Cristina Moldovan-Loomis; Leon F Garcia-Martinez; Pieter Poolman; Johannes Ledolter; Randy H Kardon; Levi P Sowers; Andrew F Russo Journal: Pain Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 7.926