Literature DB >> 25908157

Patient-reported outcomes and continuous glucose monitoring: can we do better with artificial pancreas devices?

Katharine D Barnard1, Thomas Kubiak2, Norbert Hermanns3, Lutz Heinemann4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID： 25908157     DOI： 10.2337/dc14-3044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN： 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

Review 1.  Improving the clinical value and utility of CGM systems: issues and recommendations : A joint statement of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes and the American Diabetes Association Diabetes Technology Working Group.

Authors:  John R Petrie; Anne L Peters; Richard M Bergenstal; Reinhard W Holl; G Alexander Fleming; Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  PsychDT Working Group: Report Psychosocial Aspects of Artificial Pancreas Systems.

Authors:  Katharine D Barnard; Manu V Venkat; Kelly Close; Lutz Heinemann; Jill Weissberg-Benchell; Korey K Hood; Thomas Kubiak; Aaron J Kowalski; Lori Laffel
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-17

3.  Acceptability of Implantable Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensor.

Authors:  Katharine D Barnard; Jort Kropff; Pratik Choudhary; Sankalpa Neupane; Stephen C Bain; Christoph Kapitza; Thomas Forst; Manuela Link; Colleen Mdingi; J Hans DeVries
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-10-08

4.  Acceptance of the Artificial Pancreas: Comparing the Effect of Technology Readiness, Product Characteristics, and Social Influence Between Invited and Self-Selected Respondents.

Authors:  Tamara Oukes; Helga Blauw; Arianne C van Bon; J Hans DeVries; Ariane M von Raesfeld
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-01-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.