Literature DB >> 29067486

Improving the clinical value and utility of CGM systems: issues and recommendations : A joint statement of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes and the American Diabetes Association Diabetes Technology Working Group.

John R Petrie1, Anne L Peters2, Richard M Bergenstal3, Reinhard W Holl4, G Alexander Fleming5, Lutz Heinemann6.   

Abstract

The first systems for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) became available over 15 years ago. Many then believed CGM would revolutionise the use of intensive insulin therapy in diabetes; however, progress towards that vision has been gradual. Although increasing, the proportion of individuals using CGM rather than conventional systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose on a daily basis is still low in most parts of the world. Barriers to uptake include cost, measurement reliability (particularly with earlier-generation systems), human factors issues, lack of a standardised format for displaying results and uncertainty on how best to use CGM data to make therapeutic decisions. This scientific statement makes recommendations for systemic improvements in clinical use and regulatory (pre- and postmarketing) handling of CGM devices. The aim is to improve safety and efficacy in order to support the advancement of the technology in achieving its potential to improve quality of life and health outcomes for more people with diabetes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse events; Ambulatory glucose profile; CGM; Glucose; Insulin; Interstitial; Position statement; Safety; Technology; Therapy; Time in range

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29067486     DOI: 10.1007/s00125-017-4463-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetologia        ISSN: 0012-186X            Impact factor:   10.122


  50 in total

1.  Patient-reported outcomes and continuous glucose monitoring: can we do better with artificial pancreas devices?

Authors:  Katharine D Barnard; Thomas Kubiak; Norbert Hermanns; Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  The effect of real-time continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Nicole M Ehrhardt; Mary Chellappa; M Susan Walker; Stephanie J Fonda; Robert A Vigersky
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-01

3.  Diabetes Technology-Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Therapy and Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Anne L Peters; Andrew J Ahmann; Tadej Battelino; Alison Evert; Irl B Hirsch; M Hassan Murad; William E Winter; Howard Wolpert
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 4.  Glucose Concentrations of Less Than 3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) Should Be Reported in Clinical Trials: A Joint Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Continuous glucose monitoring for patients with type 1 diabetes and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IN CONTROL): a randomised, open-label, crossover trial.

Authors:  Cornelis A J van Beers; J Hans DeVries; Susanne J Kleijer; Mark M Smits; Petronella H Geelhoed-Duijvestijn; Mark H H Kramer; Michaela Diamant; Frank J Snoek; Erik H Serné
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 32.069

6.  Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Using Insulin Injections: The DIAMOND Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Roy W Beck; Tonya Riddlesworth; Katrina Ruedy; Andrew Ahmann; Richard Bergenstal; Stacie Haller; Craig Kollman; Davida Kruger; Janet B McGill; William Polonsky; Elena Toschi; Howard Wolpert; David Price
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Glucose Variability: Timing, Risk Analysis, and Relationship to Hypoglycemia in Diabetes.

Authors:  Boris Kovatchev; Claudio Cobelli
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Threshold-based insulin-pump interruption for reduction of hypoglycemia.

Authors:  Richard M Bergenstal; David C Klonoff; Satish K Garg; Bruce W Bode; Melissa Meredith; Robert H Slover; Andrew J Ahmann; John B Welsh; Scott W Lee; Francine R Kaufman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Predictive Low-Glucose Insulin Suspension Reduces Duration of Nocturnal Hypoglycemia in Children Without Increasing Ketosis.

Authors:  Bruce A Buckingham; Dan Raghinaru; Fraser Cameron; B Wayne Bequette; H Peter Chase; David M Maahs; Robert Slover; R Paul Wadwa; Darrell M Wilson; Trang Ly; Tandy Aye; Irene Hramiak; Cheril Clarson; Robert Stein; Patricia H Gallego; John Lum; Judy Sibayan; Craig Kollman; Roy W Beck
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  REPLACE-BG: A Randomized Trial Comparing Continuous Glucose Monitoring With and Without Routine Blood Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Well-Controlled Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Grazia Aleppo; Katrina J Ruedy; Tonya D Riddlesworth; Davida F Kruger; Anne L Peters; Irl Hirsch; Richard M Bergenstal; Elena Toschi; Andrew J Ahmann; Viral N Shah; Michael R Rickels; Bruce W Bode; Athena Philis-Tsimikas; Rodica Pop-Busui; Henry Rodriguez; Emily Eyth; Anuj Bhargava; Craig Kollman; Roy W Beck
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Positioning time in range in diabetes management.

Authors:  Andrew Advani
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  Impact of acute-phase insulin secretion on glycemic variability in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Yiming Si; Yun Shen; Jingyi Lu; Xiaojing Ma; Lei Zhang; Yifei Mo; Wei Lu; Wei Zhu; Yuqian Bao; Gang Hu; Jian Zhou
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Evaluating a Glucose-Sensor-Based Tool to Help Clinicians and Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Improve Self-Management Skills.

Authors:  Elena Toschi; Lawrence Fisher; Howard Wolpert; Michael Love; Timothy Dunn; Gary Hayter
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-07-31

4.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Review of Available Systems.

Authors:  Vienica D Funtanilla; PharmD Candidate; Tina Caliendo; Olga Hilas
Journal:  P T       Date:  2019-09

Review 5.  Biopsychosocial Factors Associated With Satisfaction and Sustained Use of Artificial Pancreas Technology and Its Components: a Call to the Technology Field.

Authors:  Gregory P Forlenza; Laurel H Messer; Cari Berget; R Paul Wadwa; Kimberly A Driscoll
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 4.810

6.  Adverse Event Data for Years 2018 to 2020 for Diabetes Devices.

Authors:  Jan S Krouwer
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-05-08

7.  Important Drop in Rate of Acute Diabetes Complications in People With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes After Initiation of Flash Glucose Monitoring in France: The RELIEF Study.

Authors:  Ronan Roussel; Jean-Pierre Riveline; Eric Vicaut; Gérard de Pouvourville; Bruno Detournay; Corinne Emery; Fleur Levrat-Guillen; Bruno Guerci
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 17.152

8.  Efficacy Comparison of Preprandial and Postprandial Prandilin 25 Administration in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Using a Continuous Glucose Monitoring System.

Authors:  Yong Luo; Wen-Ji Ni; B O Ding; Xiang-Hong Xu; Lei Ye; Jian-Hua Ma; Jian Zhu
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 2.945

9.  Improvement in Glucose Regulation Using a Digital Tracker and Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Healthy Adults and Those with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Ashkan Dehghani Zahedani; Solmaz Shariat Torbaghan; Salar Rahili; Kirill Karlin; Darrin Scilley; Riya Thakkar; Maziyar Saberi; Noosheen Hashemi; Dalia Perelman; Nima Aghaeepour; Tracey McLaughlin; Michael P Snyder
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.945

10.  GLU: a software package for analysing continuously measured glucose levels in epidemiology.

Authors:  Louise A C Millard; Nashita Patel; Kate Tilling; Melanie Lewcock; Peter A Flach; Debbie A Lawlor
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 7.196

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.