Literature DB >> 25907036

A transient cell-shielding method for viable MSC delivery within hydrophobic scaffolds polymerized in situ.

Ruijing Guo1, Catherine L Ward2, Jeffrey M Davidson3, Craig L Duvall4, Joseph C Wenke2, Scott A Guelcher5.   

Abstract

Cell-based therapies have emerged as promising approaches for regenerative medicine. Hydrophobic poly(ester urethane)s offer the advantages of robust mechanical properties, cell attachment without the use of peptides, and controlled degradation by oxidative and hydrolytic mechanisms. However, the application of injectable hydrophobic polymers to cell delivery is limited by the challenges of protecting cells from reaction products and creating a macroporous architecture post-cure. We designed injectable carriers for cell delivery derived from reactive, hydrophobic polyisocyanate and polyester triol precursors. To overcome cell death caused by reaction products from in situ polymerization, we encapsulated bone marrow-derived stem cells (BMSCs) in fastdegrading, oxidized alginate beads prior to mixing with the hydrophobic precursors. Cells survived the polymerization at >70% viability, and rapid dissolution of oxidized alginate beads after the scaffold cured created interconnected macropores that facilitated cellular adhesion to the scaffold in vitro. Applying this injectable system to deliver BMSCs to rat excisional skin wounds showed that the scaffolds supported survival of transplanted cells and infiltration of host cells, which improved new tissue formation compared to both implanted, pre-formed scaffolds seeded with cells and acellular controls. Our design is the first to enable injectable delivery of settable, hydrophobic scaffolds where cell encapsulation provides a mechanism for both temporary cytoprotection during polymerization and rapid formation of macropores post-polymerization. This simple approach provides potential advantages for cell delivery relative to hydrogel technologies, which have weaker mechanical properties and require incorporation of peptides to achieve cell adhesion and degradability.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell encapsulation; Mesenchymal stem cell; Polymerisation; Polyorthoester; Polyurethane; Wound healing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25907036      PMCID: PMC4409667          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  44 in total

Review 1.  Mesenchymal stem cells as trophic mediators.

Authors:  Arnold I Caplan; James E Dennis
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 4.429

Review 2.  Injectable matrices and scaffolds for drug delivery in tissue engineering.

Authors:  James D Kretlow; Leda Klouda; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 15.470

3.  Adipose tissue engineering using injectable, oxidized alginate hydrogels.

Authors:  Woo Seob Kim; David J Mooney; Praveen R Arany; Kangwon Lee; Nathaniel Huebsch; Jaeyun Kim
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Synthesis and in vitro biocompatibility of injectable polyurethane foam scaffolds.

Authors:  Scott A Guelcher; Vishal Patel; Katie M Gallagher; Susan Connolly; Jonathan E Didier; John S Doctor; Jeffrey O Hollinger
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2006-05

5.  Cytocompatibility of UV and visible light photoinitiating systems on cultured NIH/3T3 fibroblasts in vitro.

Authors:  S J Bryant; C R Nuttelman; K S Anseth
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.517

6.  A new peptide-based urethane polymer: synthesis, biodegradation, and potential to support cell growth in vitro.

Authors:  J Y Zhang; E J Beckman; N P Piesco; S Agarwal
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Self-assembled hydrogel nanoparticles composed of dextran and poly(ethylene glycol) macromer.

Authors:  I S Kim; Y I Jeong; S H Kim
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 5.875

8.  Effects of protein dose and delivery system on BMP-mediated bone regeneration.

Authors:  Joel D Boerckel; Yash M Kolambkar; Kenneth M Dupont; Brent A Uhrig; Edward A Phelps; Hazel Y Stevens; Andrés J García; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Maleimide cross-linked bioactive PEG hydrogel exhibits improved reaction kinetics and cross-linking for cell encapsulation and in situ delivery.

Authors:  Edward A Phelps; Nduka O Enemchukwu; Vincent F Fiore; Jay C Sy; Niren Murthy; Todd A Sulchek; Thomas H Barker; Andrés J García
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 30.849

10.  Bone marrow cells regenerate infarcted myocardium.

Authors:  D Orlic; J Kajstura; S Chimenti; I Jakoniuk; S M Anderson; B Li; J Pickel; R McKay; B Nadal-Ginard; D M Bodine; A Leri; P Anversa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-04-05       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  10 in total

1.  Poly(Thioketal Urethane) Autograft Extenders in an Intertransverse Process Model of Bone Formation.

Authors:  Madison A P McGough; Stefanie M Shiels; Lauren A Boller; Katarzyna J Zienkiewicz; Craig L Duvall; Joseph C Wenke; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  Biomimetic polyurethane/TiO2 nanocomposite scaffolds capable of promoting biomineralization and mesenchymal stem cell proliferation.

Authors:  Qingxia Zhu; Xiaofei Li; Zhaobo Fan; Yanyi Xu; Hong Niu; Chao Li; Yu Dang; Zheng Huang; Yun Wang; Jianjun Guan
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 7.328

Review 3.  Applied Bioengineering in Tissue Reconstruction, Replacement, and Regeneration.

Authors:  Juan M Colazo; Brian C Evans; Angel F Farinas; Salam Al-Kassis; Craig L Duvall; Wesley P Thayer
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 6.389

4.  Oxidatively Degradable Poly(thioketal urethane)/Ceramic Composite Bone Cements with Bone-Like Strength.

Authors:  Madison A P McEnery; Sichang Lu; Mukesh K Gupta; Katarzyna J Zienkiewicz; Joseph C Wenke; Kerem N Kalpakci; Daniel Shimko; Craig L Duvall; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.361

5.  Tissue-engineered 3D cancer-in-bone modeling: silk and PUR protocols.

Authors:  Ushashi Dadwal; Carolyne Falank; Heather Fairfield; Sarah Linehan; Clifford J Rosen; David L Kaplan; Julie Sterling; Michaela R Reagan
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-10-19

6.  Local Delivery of PHD2 siRNA from ROS-Degradable Scaffolds to Promote Diabetic Wound Healing.

Authors:  John R Martin; Christopher E Nelson; Mukesh K Gupta; Fang Yu; Samantha M Sarett; Kyle M Hocking; Alonda C Pollins; Lillian B Nanney; Jeffrey M Davidson; Scott A Guelcher; Craig L Duvall
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 9.933

7.  Design of Injectable Materials to Improve Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Laura M Marquardt; Sarah C Heilshorn
Journal:  Curr Stem Cell Rep       Date:  2016-07-01

Review 8.  The Bone Microenvironment: a Fertile Soil for Tumor Growth.

Authors:  Denise Buenrostro; Patrick L Mulcrone; Philip Owens; Julie A Sterling
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.096

9.  Improved in situ seeding of 3D printed scaffolds using cell-releasing hydrogels.

Authors:  Michael Whitely; Stacy Cereceres; Prachi Dhavalikar; Karim Salhadar; Thomas Wilems; Brandon Smith; Antonios Mikos; Elizabeth Cosgriff-Hernandez
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Curcumin-incorporated 3D bioprinting gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel reduces reactive oxygen species-induced adipose-derived stem cell apoptosis and improves implanting survival in diabetic wounds.

Authors:  Sizhan Xia; Tingting Weng; Ronghua Jin; Min Yang; Meirong Yu; Wei Zhang; Xingang Wang; Chunmao Han
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2022-03-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.