Literature DB >> 25906785

Analysis of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregnant Women With Diabetes: Distinct Temporal Patterns of Glucose Associated With Large-for-Gestational-Age Infants.

Graham R Law1, George T H Ellison2, Anna L Secher3, Peter Damm3, Elisabeth R Mathiesen3, Rosemary Temple4, Helen R Murphy5, Eleanor M Scott2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is increasingly used to assess glucose control in diabetes. The objective was to examine how analysis of glucose data might improve our understanding of the role temporal glucose variation has on large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants born to women with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Functional data analysis (FDA) was applied to 1.68 million glucose measurements from 759 measurement episodes, obtained from two previously published randomized controlled trials of CGM in pregnant women with diabetes. A total of 117 women with type 1 diabetes (n = 89) and type 2 diabetes (n = 28) who used repeated CGM during pregnancy were recruited from secondary care multidisciplinary obstetric clinics for diabetes in the U.K. and Denmark. LGA was defined as birth weight ≥90th percentile adjusted for sex and gestational age.
RESULTS: A total of 54 of 117 (46%) women developed LGA. LGA was associated with lower mean glucose (7.0 vs. 7.1 mmol/L; P < 0.01) in trimester 1, with higher mean glucose in trimester 2 (7.0 vs. 6.7 mmol/L; P < 0.001) and trimester 3 (6.5 vs. 6.4 mmol/L; P < 0.01). FDA showed that glucose was significantly lower midmorning (0900-1100 h) and early evening (1900-2130 h) in trimester 1, significantly higher early morning (0330-0630 h) and throughout the afternoon (1130-1700 h) in trimester 2, and significantly higher during the evening (2030-2330 h) in trimester 3 in women whose infants were LGA.
CONCLUSIONS: FDA of CGM data identified specific times of day that maternal glucose excursions were associated with LGA. It highlights trimester-specific differences, allowing treatment to be targeted to gestational glucose patterns.
© 2015 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25906785     DOI: 10.2337/dc15-0070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  30 in total

1.  Identification of maternal continuous glucose monitoring metrics related to newborn birth weight in pregnant women with gestational diabetes.

Authors:  Song-Ying Shen; Justina Žurauskienė; Dong-Mei Wei; Nian-Nian Chen; Jin-Hua Lu; Ya-Shu Kuang; Hui-Hui Liu; Jean-Baptiste Cazier; Xiu Qiu
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  CGM, Pregnancy, and Remote Monitoring.

Authors:  Sarit Polsky; Rachel Garcetti
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 3.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Review of Recent Studies Demonstrating Improved Glycemic Outcomes.

Authors:  David Rodbard
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Glycemic Variability, and Excessive Fetal Growth in Pregnancies Complicated by Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Bethany M Mulla; Nudrat Noor; Tamarra James-Todd; Elvira Isganaitis; Tamara C Takoudes; Ashley Curran; Celestine E Warren; Karen E O'Brien; Florence M Brown
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  Women's Experiences of Day-and-Night Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery During Type 1 Diabetes Pregnancy.

Authors:  Conor Farrington; Zoe Stewart; Roman Hovorka; Helen Murphy
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-10-05

Review 6.  Improving pregnancy outcomes in women with diabetes mellitus: modern management.

Authors:  Lene Ringholm; Peter Damm; Elisabeth R Mathiesen
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 43.330

7.  Novel Biochemical Markers of Glycemia to Predict Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Claire L Meek; Diana Tundidor; Denice S Feig; Jennifer M Yamamoto; Eleanor M Scott; Diane D Ma; Jose A Halperin; Helen R Murphy; Rosa Corcoy
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Pregnancy outcomes among women with type 1 diabetes mellitus using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Benjamin Rs Dixon; Alison Nankervis; Stephanie Cn Hopkins; Thomas J Cade
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2018-11-07

9.  Exploratory Analysis of Glycemic Control and Variability Over Gestation Among Pregnant Women with Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Elizabeth O Buschur; Kristen Campbell; Laura Pyle; Rachel Garcetti; Prakriti Joshee; Jamie K Demmitt; Janet K Snell-Bergeon; Sarit Polsky
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 6.118

10.  Time in Range in Pregnancy: Is There a Role?

Authors:  Jennifer A Wyckoff; Florence M Brown
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2021-05-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.