Literature DB >> 28585879

Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Review of Recent Studies Demonstrating Improved Glycemic Outcomes.

David Rodbard1.   

Abstract

Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) has been demonstrated to be clinically valuable, reducing risks of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, glycemic variability (GV), and improving patient quality of life for a wide range of patient populations and clinical indications. Use of CGM can help reduce HbA1c and mean glucose. One CGM device, with accuracy (%MARD) of approximately 10%, has recently been approved for self-adjustment of insulin dosages (nonadjuvant use) and approved for reimbursement for therapeutic use in the United States. CGM had previously been used off-label for that purpose. CGM has been demonstrated to be clinically useful in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes for patients receiving a wide variety of treatment regimens. CGM is beneficial for people using either multiple daily injections (MDI) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). CGM is used both in retrospective (professional, masked) and real-time (personal, unmasked) modes: both approaches can be beneficial. When CGM is used to suspend insulin infusion when hypoglycemia is detected until glucose returns to a safe level (low-glucose suspend), there are benefits beyond sensor-augmented pump (SAP), with greater reduction in the risk of hypoglycemia. Predictive low-glucose suspend provides greater benefits in this regard. Closed-loop control with insulin provides further improvement in quality of glycemic control. A hybrid closed-loop system has recently been approved by the U.S. FDA. Closed-loop control using both insulin and glucagon can reduce risk of hypoglycemia even more. CGM facilitates rigorous evaluation of new forms of therapy, characterizing pharmacodynamics, assessing frequency and severity of hypo- and hyperglycemia, and characterizing several aspects of GV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulatory glucose profile (AGP); Artificial pancreas (AP); Automated insulin delivery (AID); Closed-loop control (CLC); Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM); Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII); Flash glucose monitoring; Glycemic variability (GV); Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Multiple daily injections (MDI); Sensor-augmented pump (SAP); Time in range (TIR); Type 1 diabetes (T1DM); Type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28585879      PMCID: PMC5467105          DOI: 10.1089/dia.2017.0035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  129 in total

1.  Role of the continuous glucose monitoring system in pediatric patients.

Authors:  F R Kaufman
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  Evaluating the accuracy, reliability, and clinical applicability of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM): Is CGM ready for real time?

Authors:  Roger S Mazze; Ellie Strock; Sarah Borgman; David Wesley; Philip Stout; Joel Racchini
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring in children with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  H P Chase; L M Kim; S L Owen; T A MacKenzie; G J Klingensmith; R Murtfeldt; S K Garg
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Feasibility of automating insulin delivery for the treatment of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Garry M Steil; Kerstin Rebrin; Christine Darwin; Farzam Hariri; Mohammed F Saad
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 9.461

5.  Can we really close the loop and how soon? Accelerating the availability of an artificial pancreas: a roadmap to better diabetes outcomes.

Authors:  Aaron J Kowalski
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  Continuous glucose monitoring for the evaluation and improved control of gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  R Chen; Y Yogev; A Ben-Haroush; L Jovanovic; M Hod; M Phillip
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2003-10

7.  Characterizing glucose exposure for individuals with normal glucose tolerance using continuous glucose monitoring and ambulatory glucose profile analysis.

Authors:  Roger S Mazze; Ellie Strock; David Wesley; Sarah Borgman; Blaine Morgan; Richard Bergenstal; Robert Cuddihy
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.118

8.  Glucose metabolism disorder in obese children assessed by continuous glucose monitoring system.

Authors:  Chao-Chun Zou; Li Liang; Fang Hong; Zheng-Yan Zhao
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.764

9.  Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  William V Tamborlane; Roy W Beck; Bruce W Bode; Bruce Buckingham; H Peter Chase; Robert Clemons; Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer; Larry A Fox; Lisa K Gilliam; Irl B Hirsch; Elbert S Huang; Craig Kollman; Aaron J Kowalski; Lori Laffel; Jean M Lawrence; Joyce Lee; Nelly Mauras; Michael O'Grady; Katrina J Ruedy; Michael Tansey; Eva Tsalikian; Stuart Weinzimer; Darrell M Wilson; Howard Wolpert; Tim Wysocki; Dongyuan Xing
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-08       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in a clinical care environment: evidence from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation continuous glucose monitoring (JDRF-CGM) trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  102 in total

1.  A Review of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation in the Age of Automated Insulin Delivery.

Authors:  Laya Ekhlaspour; Ideen Tabatabai; Bruce Buckingham
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-05-26

Review 2.  Automated Insulin Delivery in Adults.

Authors:  Charlotte K Boughton; Roman Hovorka
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 4.741

3.  The Future of Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Satish K Garg; Halis K Akturk
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  Flash Glucose Monitoring: The Future Is Here.

Authors:  Satish K Garg; Halis Kaan Akturk
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  State of Type 1 Diabetes Care in the United States in 2016-2018 from T1D Exchange Registry Data.

Authors:  David Rodbard
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 6.  Positioning time in range in diabetes management.

Authors:  Andrew Advani
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  Performance and Usability of Three Systems for Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Direct Comparison.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Manuela Link; Ulrike Kamecke; Cornelia Haug; Bernhard Baumgartner; Raimund Weitgasser
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-02-07

8.  Patient Perception and Satisfaction With Insulin Pump System: Pilot User Experience Survey.

Authors:  Maria Adela Grando; Mike Bayuk; George Karway; Krystal Corrette; Danielle Groat; Curtiss B Cook; Bithika Thompson
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-05-05

Review 9.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring Integration in Clinical Practice: A Stepped Guide to Data Review and Interpretation.

Authors:  Grazia Aleppo; Kimberly Webb
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-11-19

Review 10.  The Digital Outcome Measure.

Authors:  Adam B Cohen; Simon C Mathews
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2018-09-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.