Literature DB >> 25906057

Deproteinated bovine bone vs. beta-tricalcium phosphate as bone graft substitutes: histomorphometric longitudinal study in the rabbit cranial vault.

Arturo Martinez1, Oscar Balboa, Iria Gasamans, Xose Luis Otero-Cepeda, Francisco Guitian.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This article aims to study differences in the bone formation and the graft resorption of two bone graft substitutes (BGS). Besides, it is our attempt to observe possible qualitative and quantitative differences in the bone reparation of the outer layer covered by collagen membrane and the uncovered inner layer in close contact with dura mater.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve rabbits were employed. Deproteinized bovine bone (DBB) and β-tricalcium phosphate (BTCP) were used as BGS. Four subcritical round defects (7 mm) were drilled in the cranial vault, removing both cortical walls. One of the holes was filled with DBB, and other was filled with BTCP. Each symmetrical position to DBB and BTCP was left empty. The whole defect set was covered with a collagen membrane. Histological and morphometric analysis was performed for 1, 4, 8, 16, 32 and 52 weeks. Morphometry measurements were carried out taking into account the whole defect and splitting inner and outer areas.
RESULTS: In DBB sites, a rapid bone growth is observed, linking the remaining particles and integrating them into the bone matrix. Permanence of these DBB particles from week 16 onwards restrains the growth of bone fraction. A greater bone growth appears in areas repaired with BTCP than in those repaired with DBB, both in the outer layer (under-membrane) and the inner layer (over dura mater). In DBB sites, a slower growth is observed in the inner layer, with no significant differences in the final bone fraction at both strata.
CONCLUSIONS: Both materials favour the closure of the defects provoked. In both cases, a synergistic effect with the collagen membrane is observed. DBB remains integrated in the bone matrix, while BTCP displays a pattern of highly developed progressive resorption with an outstanding bone fraction development.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomaterials; bone regeneration; bone substitutes; guided tissue; morphometric analysis; regeneration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25906057     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  8 in total

1.  Histomorphometric Analysis of Differential Regional Bone Regeneration Induced by Distinct Doped Membranes.

Authors:  Manuel Toledano; Cristina Vallecillo; Aida Gutierrez-Corrales; Daniel Torres-Lagares; Manuel Toledano-Osorio; María-Angeles Serrera-Figallo
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.967

2.  Evaluation of the osteogenesis and angiogenesis effects of erythropoietin and the efficacy of deproteinized bovine bone/recombinant human erythropoietin scaffold on bone defect repair.

Authors:  Donghai Li; Liqing Deng; Xiaowei Xie; Zhouyuan Yang; Pengde Kang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  Synthetic Injectable Biomaterials for Alveolar Bone Regeneration in Animal and Human Studies.

Authors:  Matej Tomas; Marija Čandrlić; Martina Juzbašić; Zrinka Ivanišević; Nikola Matijević; Aleksandar Včev; Olga Cvijanović Peloza; Marko Matijević; Željka Perić Kačarević
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Histological response of soda-lime glass-ceramic bactericidal rods implanted in the jaws of beagle dogs.

Authors:  José S Moya; Arturo Martínez; Roberto López-Píriz; Francisco Guitián; Luis A Díaz; Leticia Esteban-Tejeda; Belén Cabal; Federico Sket; Elisa Fernández-García; Antoni P Tomsia; Ramón Torrecillas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Radiographic and histological evaluation of ectopic application of deproteinized bovine bone matrix.

Authors:  Rodrigo Carlos da Silva; Viviane Rozeira Crivellaro; Allan Fernando Giovanini; Rafaela Scariot; Carla Castiglia Gonzaga; João César Zielak
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Jun

6.  Guided bone regeneration with local zoledronic acid and titanium barrier: An experimental study.

Authors:  Serkan Dundar; Cem Ozgur; Ferhan Yaman; Omer Cakmak; Arif Saybak; Ibrahim Hanifi Ozercan; Hilal Alan; Gokhan Artas; Onur Nacakgedigi
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  The effect of local application of low-magnitude high-frequency vibration on the bone healing of rabbit calvarial defects-a pilot study.

Authors:  Ivan Puhar; Li Ma; Dina Suleimenova; Vasileios Chronopoulos; Nikos Mattheos
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 8.  Barrier membranes: More than the barrier effect?

Authors:  Omar Omar; Ibrahim Elgali; Christer Dahlin; Peter Thomsen
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 8.728

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.