Literature DB >> 25904104

Formation, Accumulation, and Hydrolysis of Endogenous and Exogenous Formaldehyde-Induced DNA Damage.

Rui Yu1, Yongquan Lai1, Hadley J Hartwell1, Benjamin C Moeller2, Melanie Doyle-Eisele2, Dean Kracko2, Wanda M Bodnar1, Thomas B Starr3, James A Swenberg4.   

Abstract

Formaldehyde is not only a widely used chemical with well-known carcinogenicity but is also a normal metabolite of living cells. It thus poses unique challenges for understanding risks associated with exposure. N(2-)hydroxymethyl-dG (N(2)-HOMe-dG) is the main formaldehyde-induced DNA mono-adduct, which together with DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs) and toxicity-induced cell proliferation, play important roles in a mutagenic mode of action for cancer. In this study, N(2)-HOMe-dG was shown to be an excellent biomarker for direct adduction of formaldehyde to DNA and the hydrolysis of DPCs. The use of inhaled [(13)CD2]-formaldehyde exposures of rats and primates coupled with ultrasensitive nano ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry permitted accurate determinations of endogenous and exogenous formaldehyde DNA damage. The results show that inhaled formaldehyde only reached rat and monkey noses, but not tissues distant to the site of initial contact. The amounts of exogenous adducts were remarkably lower than those of endogenous adducts in exposed nasal epithelium. Moreover, exogenous adducts accumulated in rat nasal epithelium over the 28-days exposure to reach steady-state concentrations, followed by elimination with a half-life (t1/2) of 7.1 days. Additionally, we examined artifact formation during DNA preparation to ensure the accuracy of nonlabeled N(2)-HOMe-dG measurements. These novel findings provide critical new data for understanding major issues identified by the National Research Council Review of the 2010 Environmental Protection Agency's Draft Integrated Risk Information System Formaldehyde Risk Assessment. They support a data-driven need for reflection on whether risks have been overestimated for inhaled formaldehyde, whereas underappreciating endogenous formaldehyde as the primary source of exposure that results in bone marrow toxicity and leukemia in susceptible humans and rodents deficient in DNA repair.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA monoadducts; DNA-protein crosslinks; accumulation; artifacts; distribution; endogenous; exogenous; formaldehyde; half-life; nano liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; steady state

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25904104      PMCID: PMC4476463          DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfv079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  38 in total

1.  Fancd2 counteracts the toxic effects of naturally produced aldehydes in mice.

Authors:  Frédéric Langevin; Gerry P Crossan; Ivan V Rosado; Mark J Arends; Ketan J Patel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Formaldehyde carcinogenicity research: 30 years and counting for mode of action, epidemiology, and cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  James A Swenberg; Benjamin C Moeller; Kun Lu; Julia E Rager; Rebecca C Fry; Thomas B Starr
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 1.902

3.  Molecular dosimetry of N2-hydroxymethyl-dG DNA adducts in rats exposed to formaldehyde.

Authors:  Kun Lu; Benjamin Moeller; Melanie Doyle-Eisele; Jacob McDonald; James A Swenberg
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  A novel bottom-up approach to bounding low-dose human cancer risks from chemical exposures.

Authors:  Thomas B Starr; James A Swenberg
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.271

5.  DNA--protein crosslinks, a biomarker of exposure to formaldehyde--in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  J Shaham; Y Bomstein; A Meltzer; Z Kaufman; E Palma; J Ribak
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.944

6.  Variant ALDH2 is associated with accelerated progression of bone marrow failure in Japanese Fanconi anemia patients.

Authors:  Asuka Hira; Hiromasa Yabe; Kenichi Yoshida; Yusuke Okuno; Yuichi Shiraishi; Kenichi Chiba; Hiroko Tanaka; Satoru Miyano; Jun Nakamura; Seiji Kojima; Seishi Ogawa; Keitaro Matsuo; Minoru Takata; Miharu Yabe
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Formaldehyde catabolism is essential in cells deficient for the Fanconi anemia DNA-repair pathway.

Authors:  Ivan V Rosado; Frédéric Langevin; Gerry P Crossan; Minoru Takata; Ketan J Patel
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 15.369

8.  Detection of DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs) by novel direct fluorescence labeling methods: distinct stabilities of aldehyde and radiation-induced DPCs.

Authors:  Mahmoud I Shoulkamy; Toshiaki Nakano; Makiko Ohshima; Ryoichi Hirayama; Akiko Uzawa; Yoshiya Furusawa; Hiroshi Ide
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Genotoxic consequences of endogenous aldehydes on mouse haematopoietic stem cell function.

Authors:  Juan I Garaycoechea; Gerry P Crossan; Frederic Langevin; Maria Daly; Mark J Arends; Ketan J Patel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-26       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Dosimetry of N⁶-formyllysine adducts following [¹³C²H₂]-formaldehyde exposures in rats.

Authors:  Bahar Edrissi; Koli Taghizadeh; Benjamin C Moeller; Dean Kracko; Melanie Doyle-Eisele; James A Swenberg; Peter C Dedon
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.739

View more
  24 in total

1.  Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method To Determine Formaldehyde Hemoglobin Adducts in Humans as Biomarker for Formaldehyde Exposure.

Authors:  Min Yang; Maria Ospina; Chui Tse; Stephen Toth; Samuel P Caudill; Hubert W Vesper
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.739

2.  Completing the Link between Exposure Science and Toxicology for Improved Environmental Health Decision Making: The Aggregate Exposure Pathway Framework.

Authors:  Justin G Teeguarden; Yu-Mei Tan; Stephen W Edwards; Jeremy A Leonard; Kim A Anderson; Richard A Corley; Molly L Kile; Staci M Simonich; David Stone; Robert L Tanguay; Katrina M Waters; Stacey L Harper; David E Williams
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  N6-Formyllysine as a Biomarker of Formaldehyde Exposure: Formation and Loss of N6-Formyllysine in Nasal Epithelium in Long-Term, Low-Dose Inhalation Studies in Rats.

Authors:  Bahar Edrissi; Koli Taghizadeh; Benjamin C Moeller; Rui Yu; Dean Kracko; Melanie Doyle-Eisele; James A Swenberg; Peter C Dedon
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 4.  DNA-protein crosslink formation by endogenous aldehydes and AP sites.

Authors:  Jun Nakamura; Mai Nakamura
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2020-02-10

Review 5.  Mode of action-based risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens.

Authors:  Andrea Hartwig; Michael Arand; Bernd Epe; Sabine Guth; Gunnar Jahnke; Alfonso Lampen; Hans-Jörg Martus; Bernhard Monien; Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Simone Schmitz-Spanke; Gerlinde Schriever-Schwemmer; Pablo Steinberg; Gerhard Eisenbrand
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 5.153

6.  Measurement of Endogenous versus Exogenous Formaldehyde-Induced DNA-Protein Crosslinks in Animal Tissues by Stable Isotope Labeling and Ultrasensitive Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Yongquan Lai; Rui Yu; Hadley J Hartwell; Benjamin C Moeller; Wanda M Bodnar; James A Swenberg
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Hydrogen Sulfide Inhibits Formaldehyde-Induced Senescence in HT-22 Cells via Upregulation of Leptin Signaling.

Authors:  Wei-Wen Zhu; Min Ning; Yi-Zhu Peng; Yi-Yun Tang; Xuan Kang; Ke-Bin Zhan; Wei Zou; Ping Zhang; Xiao-Qing Tang
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 3.843

8.  Effects of Gut Microbiome on Carcinogenic DNA Damage.

Authors:  Yun-Chung Hsiao; Chih-Wei Liu; Liang Chi; Yifei Yang; Kun Lu
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 9.  Contributions of DNA repair and damage response pathways to the non-linear genotoxic responses of alkylating agents.

Authors:  Joanna Klapacz; Lynn H Pottenger; Bevin P Engelward; Christopher D Heinen; George E Johnson; Rebecca A Clewell; Paul L Carmichael; Yeyejide Adeleye; Melvin E Andersen
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 5.657

10.  A Surge of DNA Damage Links Transcriptional Reprogramming and Hematopoietic Deficit in Fanconi Anemia.

Authors:  Xi Shen; Rui Wang; Moon Jong Kim; Qianghua Hu; Chih-Chao Hsu; Jun Yao; Naeh Klages-Mundt; Yanyan Tian; Erica Lynn; Thomas F Brewer; Yilei Zhang; Banu Arun; Boyi Gan; Michael Andreeff; Shunichi Takeda; Junjie Chen; Jae-Il Park; Xiaobing Shi; Christopher J Chang; Sung Yun Jung; Jun Qin; Lei Li
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 17.970

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.