Literature DB >> 25903814

Efficacy of Polyhexamethylene Biguanide-containing Antimicrobial Foam Dressing Against MRSA Relative to Standard Foam Dressing.

Kelly R Kirker1, Steve T Fisher, Garth A James, Diane McGhee, Chirag B Shah.   

Abstract

  Many modern foam wound dressings possess a variety of attributes that are designed to create a supportive wound-healing environment. These attributes include absorbing exudate, providing optimum moisture balance at the wound surface, and preventing maceration of surrounding tissue. However, studies suggest that controlling wound bioburden should also be targeted when developing wound therapeutics. Thus, traditional foam dressings may absorb a copious amount of fluid, but may also provide an environment where microbes can grow unchallenged, leading to an increase in wound bioburden. However, antimicrobial foam dressings may prevent or reduce microbial growth, increasing the potential for wound healing. Studies reported herein evaluated the efficacy of 0.5% polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) treated dressings to prevent the growth of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). An antimicrobial foam (Kendall™ AMD, Covidien, Mansfield, MA), which contains PHMB and a standard foam dressing (Copa™, Covidien, Mansfield, MA), which contains no PHMB (control), were directly inoculated with clinical isolate of MRSA and placed on a growth medium for selected time intervals. The presence or absence of microbial growth was quantified using plate counts and was visually assessed using scanning electron microscopy. At all time points, the antimicrobial foam dressing significantly reduced the MRSA growth compared to the control dressing. Similar results were also obtained in the microscopic evaluations. .

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 25903814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wounds        ISSN: 1044-7946            Impact factor:   1.546


  5 in total

1.  A Comparison of the Effects of Topical Prolavacid Solution (a Polyhexamethylene Biguanide-Based Wound Cleanser) and Medihoney Ointment in a Rat Model of Cutaneous Wound.

Authors:  Shahram Paydar; Bijan Ziaeian; Amirreza Dehghanian; Mohsen Heidarpour; Roshanak Alavi Moghadam; Behnam Dalfardi; Abbas Hallaj Karladani
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Antimicrobial gauze as a dressing reduces pin site infection: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  C K Lee; Y P Chua; A Saw
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08-13       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Development and application of a polymicrobial, in vitro, wound biofilm model.

Authors:  J Woods; L Boegli; K R Kirker; A M Agostinho; A M Durch; E Delancey Pulcini; P S Stewart; G A James
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 4.  Antibiotics-Free Compounds for Chronic Wound Healing.

Authors:  David O Oluwole; Lucy Coleman; William Buchanan; Tao Chen; Roberto M La Ragione; Lian X Liu
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 6.525

5.  Clinical impact of an anti-biofilm Hydrofiber dressing in hard-to-heal wounds previously managed with traditional antimicrobial products and systemic antibiotics.

Authors:  Daniel G Metcalf; Philip G Bowler
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2020-03-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.