Literature DB >> 22353049

Development and application of a polymicrobial, in vitro, wound biofilm model.

J Woods1, L Boegli, K R Kirker, A M Agostinho, A M Durch, E Delancey Pulcini, P S Stewart, G A James.   

Abstract

AIMS: The goal of this investigation was to develop an in vitro, polymicrobial, wound biofilm capable of supporting the growth of bacteria with variable oxygen requirements. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The strict anaerobe Clostridium perfringens was isolated by cultivating wound homogenates using the drip-flow reactor (DFR), and a three-species biofilm model was established using methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Cl. perfringens in the colony-drip-flow reactor model. Plate counts revealed that MRSA, Ps. aeruginosa and Cl. perfringens grew to 7·39 ± 0·45, 10·22 ± 0·22 and 7·13 ± 0·77 log CFU per membrane, respectively. The three-species model was employed to evaluate the efficacy of two antimicrobial dressings, Curity™ AMD and Acticoat™, compared to sterile gauze controls. Microbial growth on Curity™ AMD and gauze was not significantly different, for any species, whereas Acticoat™ was found to significantly reduce growth for all three species.
CONCLUSIONS: Using the colony-DFR, a three-species biofilm was successfully grown, and the biofilms displayed a unique structure consisting of distinct layers that appeared to be inhabited exclusively or predominantly by a single species. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The primary accomplishment of this study was the isolation and growth of an obligate anaerobe in an in vitro model without establishing an artificially anaerobic environment.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Applied Microbiology © 2012 The Society for Applied Microbiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22353049      PMCID: PMC3324638          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05264.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  38 in total

1.  Biofilm maturity studies indicate sharp debridement opens a time- dependent therapeutic window.

Authors:  R D Wolcott; K P Rumbaugh; G James; G Schultz; P Phillips; Q Yang; C Watters; P S Stewart; S E Dowd
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.072

2.  How to optimize the drop plate method for enumerating bacteria.

Authors:  B Herigstad; M Hamilton; J Heersink
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 2.363

Review 3.  Topical silver for treating infected wounds.

Authors:  H Vermeulen; J M van Hattem; M N Storm-Versloot; D T Ubbink
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-01-24

4.  Testing wound dressings using an in vitro wound model.

Authors:  C Lipp; K Kirker; A Agostinho; G James; P Stewart
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.072

5.  Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy.

Authors:  Chandan K Sen; Gayle M Gordillo; Sashwati Roy; Robert Kirsner; Lynn Lambert; Thomas K Hunt; Finn Gottrup; Geoffrey C Gurtner; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.617

6.  The response of Escherichia coli to exposure to the biocide polyhexamethylene biguanide.

Authors:  Michael J Allen; Graham F White; Andrew P Morby
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.777

7.  In vitro efficacy of a polyhexamethylene biguanide-impregnated gauze dressing against bacteria found in veterinary patients.

Authors:  William R Lee; Karen M Tobias; David A Bemis; Barton W Rohrbach
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.495

8.  A novel in vitro flat-bed perfusion biofilm model for determining the potential antimicrobial efficacy of topical wound treatments.

Authors:  R M S Thorn; J Greenman
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 9.  A new technology of microdispersed silver in polyurethane induces antimicrobial activity in central venous catheters.

Authors:  J P Guggenbichler; M Böswald; S Lugauer; T Krall
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 7.455

10.  Polymicrobial nature of chronic diabetic foot ulcer biofilm infections determined using bacterial tag encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP).

Authors:  Scot E Dowd; Randall D Wolcott; Yan Sun; Trevor McKeehan; Ethan Smith; Daniel Rhoads
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Biofilm models of polymicrobial infection.

Authors:  Rebecca A Gabrilska; Kendra P Rumbaugh
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.165

2.  Collagen and hyaluronan at wound sites influence early polymicrobial biofilm adhesive events.

Authors:  Eric Birkenhauer; Suresh Neethirajan; J Scott Weese
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.605

Review 3.  From in vitro to in vivo Models of Bacterial Biofilm-Related Infections.

Authors:  David Lebeaux; Ashwini Chauhan; Olaya Rendueles; Christophe Beloin
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2013-05-13

4.  Growth of MRSA and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a fine-celled foam model containing sessile commensal skin bacteria.

Authors:  Angela Oates; Andrew J McBain
Journal:  Biofouling       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.209

5.  Prevention of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation by antibiotics in 96-Microtiter Well Plates and Drip Flow Reactors: critical factors influencing outcomes.

Authors:  Suvi Manner; Darla M Goeres; Malena Skogman; Pia Vuorela; Adyary Fallarero
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Metabolic modeling of a chronic wound biofilm consortium predicts spatial partitioning of bacterial species.

Authors:  Poonam Phalak; Jin Chen; Ross P Carlson; Michael A Henson
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2016-09-07

7.  Spatially resolved analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm proteomes measured by laser ablation sample transfer.

Authors:  Aruni Chathurya Pulukkody; Yeni P Yung; Fabrizio Donnarumma; Kermit K Murray; Ross P Carlson; Luke Hanley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparative analysis of single-species and polybacterial wound biofilms using a quantitative, in vivo, rabbit ear model.

Authors:  Akhil K Seth; Matthew R Geringer; Seok J Hong; Kai P Leung; Robert D Galiano; Thomas A Mustoe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Development of a Laboratory Model of a Phototroph-Heterotroph Mixed-Species Biofilm at the Stone/Air Interface.

Authors:  Federica Villa; Betsey Pitts; Ellen Lauchnor; Francesca Cappitelli; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Spatiotemporal modeling of microbial metabolism.

Authors:  Jin Chen; Jose A Gomez; Kai Höffner; Poonam Phalak; Paul I Barton; Michael A Henson
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2016-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.