| Literature DB >> 25897411 |
Abstract
In order to address the limitations associated with the inefficient pasteurization platform used to make Makgeolli, such as the presence of turbid colloidal dispersions in suspension, commercially available Makgeolli was minimally processed using a low-pressure homogenization-based pasteurization (LHBP) process. This continuous process demonstrates that promptly reducing the exposure time to excessive heat using either large molecules or insoluble particles can dramatically improve internal quality and decrease irreversible damage. Specifically, optimal homogenization increased concomitantly with physical parameters such as colloidal stability (65.0% of maximum and below 25-μm particles) following two repetitions at 25.0 MPa. However, biochemical parameters such as microbial population, acidity, and the presence of fermentable sugars rarely affected Makgeolli quality. Remarkably, there was a 4.5-log reduction in the number of Saccharomyces cerevisiae target cells at 53.5°C for 70 sec in optimally homogenized Makgeolli. This value was higher than the 37.7% measured from traditionally pasteurized Makgeolli. In contrast to the analytical similarity among homogenized Makgeollis, our objective quality evaluation demonstrated significant differences between pasteurized (or unpasteurized) Makgeolli and LHBP-treated Makgeolli. Low-pressure homogenization-based pasteurization, Makgeolli, minimal processing-preservation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, suspension stability.Entities:
Keywords: Low-pressure homogenization-based pasteurization; Makgeolli; Minimal processing-preservation; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Suspension stability
Year: 2015 PMID: 25897411 PMCID: PMC4398680 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-015-0936-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Figure 1Real-time changes of suspension stability in minimally processed samples under various homogenization conditions during the storage period. All points shown are the mean values of triplicate experiments.
Figure 2Conserved photomicrographs of suspension pretreated by homogenization. (A) Supernatant liquid after sedimentation (100× magnified). (B) Untreated (100× magnified). (C) Homogenized at 15.0 MPa (100× magnified). (D) Homogenized at 25.0 MPa (100× magnified). (E) Homogenized at 35.0 MPa (100× magnified). (F) Homogenized twice at 15.0 MPa (100× magnified). (G) Homogenized twice at 25.0 MPa (100× magnified). (H) Homogenized twice at 35.0 MPa (100× magnified).
Figure 3Size distribution patterns of insoluble microparticles changed in homogenization-treated suspensions containing 7% ethanol.
Figure 4Fluidic changes of apparent viscosity in suspension with insoluble particles under the various homogenization conditions. All points shown are the mean ± standard deviation of observations that were analyzed in triplicate.
Thermal resistance index after optimal LHBP process
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |||
| Untreated | - | - | - | ~107 | ~106 |
| Homogenized only (twice at 25.0 MPa) | - | - | - | ~107 | ~106 |
| Pasteurized only | 1.06 | 1.00 | 0.22 | ~107 (after 7 days; at | ~103 (after 35 days) |
| ~107 (after 7 days; at | |||||
| ~107 (after 14 days; at | |||||
| HBP-treated (twice at 25.0 MPa) | 0.87 | 0.63 | 0.20 | ~107 (after 7 days; at | 102–103 (after 35 days) |
| ~107 (after 7 days; at | |||||
| < 100 (after 14 day; at | |||||
aThermal death time of S. cerevisiae.
Figure 5Identification of yeasts by biomolecular techniques. (A) RAPD amplification patterns for yeast strains obtained with primer OPA-18. (Lane a) 1 kb marker. (Lane b) Reference strain, S. cerevisiae ATCC 9080. (Lane c) Yeast strain in homogenized Makgeolli (Lane d) Yeast strain in LHBP-treated Makgeolli. (B) Carbon source utilization tests for yeast identification in processed Makgeolli.
Evaluation of internal quality in before and after optimal LHBP process
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Untreated | ~7.0 | ~3.4 | ~19.8 | ~9.0 |
| ~6.3 (after 7 days) | ~9.0 (after 7 days) | ~8.7 (after 7 days) | ||
| Homogenized only (twice at 25.0 MPa) | ~7.0 | ~3.4 | ~19.9 | 8.9 |
| ~6.1 (after 7 days) | ~8.9 (after 7 days) | ~8.8 (after 7 days) | ||
| Pasteurized only | ~7.0 | ~3.4 | ~20.6 | ~1.4 |
| ~7.0 (after 35 days) | ~3.8(after 35 days) | ~22.3 (after 35 days) | ~2.8 (after 35 days) | |
| HBP-treated (twice at 25.0 MPa) | ~7.0 | ~3.3 | ~20.8 | ~1.3 |
| ~7.0 (after 35 days) | ~3.5 (after 35 days) | ~23.5 (after 35 days) | ~3.0 (after 35 days) | |
aBiochemical changes during cold storage at 4°C.
bRemained reducing sugars in suspension.
Figure 6Effect of LHBP treatment on inactivation of strains. Makgeolli samples were applied to the LHBP program based on optimal condition (i.e., homogenized twice at 25.0 MPa). After the LHBP process, the number of target colonies was converted to logarithm (base 10) of colony forming units per gram (log CFU/g). All data shown are the mean values of triplicate observations.
Objective index evaluation of by optimal LHBP process
|
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Untreated | 75.90 ± 0.13a | −1.85 ± 0.04d | 9.27 ± 0.07a | - | 104.28 ± 16.84 | 201.05 ± 34.33 | 133.35 ± 28.16 | 45.83 ± 15.04 |
| (after 7 days) | (after 7 days) | (after 7 days) | (after 7 days) | |||||
| Homogenized only (twice at 25.0 MPa) | 69.41 ± 0.04b | −1.58 ± 0.01c | 5.17 ± 0.01b | 7.68 | 101.14 ± 11.66 | 198.55 ± 28.89 | 122.20 ± 24.56 | 43.95 ± 13.01 |
| (after 7 days) | (after 7 days) | (after 7 days) | (after 7 days) | |||||
| Pasteurized only (at | 61.79 ± 0.07d | −1.08 ± 0.01a | 3.18 ± 0.01d | 15.39 | 111.25 ± 8.04 | 138.83 ± 7.44 | 120.30 ± 10.22 | 76.62 ± 18.52 |
| (after 35 days) | (after 35 days) | (after 35 days) | (after 35 days) | |||||
| HBP-treated (twice at 25.0 MPa and | 67.30 ± 0.03c | −1.31 ± 0.02b | 4.32 ± 0.01c | 9.94 | 108.02 ± 5.80 | 119.66 ± 6.24 | 116.67 ± 8.90 | 74.10 ± 14.03 |
| (after 35 days) | (after 35 days) | (after 35 days) | (after 35 days) | |||||
aLightness, 0 (black) ~ 100 (white); Redness, −80 (greenness) ~ 100 (redness); Yellowness, −80 (blueness) ~ 70 (yellowness); Color difference, {(L – L0)2 + (a – a0)2 + (b – b0)2}1/2. Superscript characters indicate significant difference at P < 0.05 by Duncan’s multiple comparison.
bUpregulated target odor-active compounds (μg/ml) with significant difference at 0.01 ≤ P < 0.05.
cAroma threshold value in water (in parts per billion).