| Literature DB >> 25897387 |
Jielin Ge1, Gaoming Xiong2, Zhixian Wang3, Mi Zhang4, Changming Zhao2, Guozhen Shen2, Wenting Xu2, Zongqiang Xie2.
Abstract
Extreme climatic events can trigger gradual or abrupt shifts in forest ecosystems via the reduction or elimination of foundation species. However, the impacts of these events on foundation species' demography and forest dynamics remain poorly understood. Here we quantified dynamics for both evergreen and deciduous broad-leaved species groups, utilizing a monitoring permanent plot in a subtropical montane mixed forest in central China from 2001 to 2010 with particular relevance to the anomalous 2008 ice storm episode. We found that both species groups showed limited floristic alterations over the study period. For each species group, size distribution of dead individuals approximated a roughly irregular and flat shape prior to the ice storm and resembled an inverse J-shaped distribution after the ice storm. Furthermore, patterns of mortality and recruitment displayed disequilibrium behaviors with mortality exceeding recruitment for both species groups following the ice storm. Deciduous broad-leaved species group accelerated overall diameter growth, but the ice storm reduced evergreen small-sized diameter growth. We concluded that evergreen broad-leaved species were more susceptible to ice storms than deciduous broad-leaved species, and ice storm events, which may become more frequent with climate change, might potentially threaten the perpetuity of evergreen-dominated broad-leaved forests in this subtropical region in the long term. These results underscore the importance of long-term monitoring that is indispensible to elucidate causal links between forest dynamics and climatic perturbations.Entities:
Keywords: Diameter growth rate; frost damage; leaf habit; recruitment and mortality; the extreme climatic event
Year: 2015 PMID: 25897387 PMCID: PMC4395177 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1433
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Structural characteristics of the two species groups during the study period (2001–2010)
| Species group | Species richness | Stem density (stems ha−1) | Basal area (m2 ha−1) | Mean stem diameter (cm) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 2006 | 2010 | 2001 | 2006 | 2010 | 2001 | 2006 | 2010 | 2001 | 2006 | 2010 | |
| Evergreen species | 20 | 21 | 21 | 1406 | 1475 | 1383 | 12.70 | 13.76 | 13.16 | 9.24 | 9.41 | 9.5 |
| Deciduous species | 60 | 62 | 61 | 1260 | 1281 | 1194 | 26.52 | 28.25 | 28.65 | 13.9 | 14.18 | 14.8 |
Species characteristics of the most abundant woody species
| Species | Group | Stem density (stems ha−1) | Basal area (m2 ha−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 2006 | 2010 | 2001 | 2006 | 2010 | ||
| E | 880 | 926 | 848 | 7.84 | 8.56 | 8.02 | |
| E | 219 | 227 | 214 | 1.14 | 1.27 | 1.29 | |
| E | 81 | 83 | 68 | 2.10 | 2.21 | 1.98 | |
| E | 53 | 58 | 68 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.22 | |
| E | 39 | 38 | 38 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.45 | |
| E | 23 | 24 | 28 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.23 | |
| D | 272 | 275 | 264 | 5.56 | 5.83 | 5.93 | |
| D | 121 | 126 | 122 | 0.85 | 0.92 | 0.92 | |
| D | 73 | 72 | 60 | 1.65 | 1.73 | 1.69 | |
| D | 52 | 56 | 47 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.13 | |
| D | 52 | 53 | 53 | 1.15 | 1.25 | 1.32 | |
| D | 49 | 48 | 46 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.74 | |
E: Evergreen broad-leaved species; D: Deciduous broad-leaved species.
Bray–Curtis dissimilarity index of the relative dominance ratio for each species group
| Species group | 2001–2006 | 2006–2010 | 2001–2010 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evergreen species | 0.012 | 0.029 | 0.028 |
| Deciduous species | 0.019 | 0.029 | 0.036 |
Recruitment and mortality rate for each species group
| Species Group | Based on stem number | Basal on basal area | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruitment rate (% yr−1) | Mortality rate (% yr−1) | Recruitment rate (% yr−1) | Mortality rate (% yr−1) | |||||
| 2001–2006 | 2006–2010 | 2001–2006 | 2006–2010 | 2001–2006 | 2006–2010 | 2001–2006 | 2006–2010 | |
| Evergreen species | 1.18 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 1.79 | 1.79 | 2.12 | 0.17 | 3.24 |
| Deciduous species | 0.68 | 1.09 | 0.35 | 2.86 | 1.62 | 1.79 | 0.36 | 1.44 |
Figure 1Size distributions of dead individuals for each species group during the study period (2001–2010). (A) Evergreen broad-leaved species; (B) Deciduous broad-leaved species.
Figure 2Mean diameter growth rate for each species group.
Figure 3Relationships between mean diameter growth rate and size for each species group during the study period (2001–2010). (A) Evergreen broad-leaved species; (B) Deciduous broad-leaved species.