| Literature DB >> 24879434 |
Karin Nadrowski1, Katherina Pietsch1, Martin Baruffol2, Sabine Both3, Jessica Gutknecht4, Helge Bruelheide3, Heike Heklau3, Anja Kahl1, Tiemo Kahl5, Pascal Niklaus2, Wenzel Kröber3, Xiaojuan Liu6, Xiangcheng Mi6, Stefan Michalski7, Goddert von Oheimb8, Oliver Purschke9, Bernhard Schmid2, Teng Fang10, Erik Welk3, Christian Wirth1.
Abstract
Future climates are likely to include extreme events, which in turn have great impacts on ecological systems. In this study, we investigated possible effects that could mitigate stem breakage caused by a rare and extreme ice storm in a Chinese subtropical forest across a gradient of forest diversity. We used Bayesian modeling to correct stem breakage for tree size and variance components analysis to quantify the influence of taxon, leaf and wood functional traits, and stand level properties on the probability of stem breakage. We show that the taxon explained four times more variance in individual stem breakage than did stand level properties; trees with higher specific leaf area (SLA) were less susceptible to breakage. However, a large part of the variation at the taxon scale remained unexplained, implying that unmeasured or undefined traits could be used to predict damage caused by ice storms. When aggregated at the plot level, functional diversity and wood density increased after the ice storm. We suggest that for the adaption of forest management to climate change, much can still be learned from looking at functional traits at the taxon level.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24879434 PMCID: PMC4039427 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Tree stem breakage after the 2008 ice storm along tree size.
Broken stems are scattered around 1 and stems not broken around 0. The red line represents a moving window (Loess) smoother for breakage incidences. The dark grey polygon represents the 95% confidence interval for the probability of breakage of individual stems based on the posterior distribution estimated using a power Ricker function (Equation 1). refers to the maximum breakage probability, x is the stem DBH, is the DBH at maximum breakage probability and α is a scaling parameter that increases the flatness of the curve at maximum breakage probability.
Figure 2Partitioning the magnitude of variance into the taxon and the stand random variance components.
The taxon variance component consisting of species and family effects explained 11% and 10% of the total variance components for DBH corrected breakage probability; the stand variance component explained 6%. The remaining 73% are unexplained variation at the level of the individual tree.
Fixed effects of stand and species related attributes on the probability of stem breakage from the ice storm.
| Fixed effects | Δ AIC | p | dir | |
| Stand properties | ||||
| Stand age | −9.13 | 0.001 ** | ↓ | |
| Richness | 1.20 | 0.371 | ||
| Stand axis 1 (e.g. vegetation cover) | −0.30 | 0.129 | ||
| Stand axis 2 (e.g. decreasing functional diversity) | 1.66 | 0.559 | ||
| Species traits | ||||
| Xylem axis 1 (e.g. crystals) | 1.75 | 0.617 | ||
| Xylem axis 2 (e.g. decreasing vessel diameter) | −0.21 | 0.137 | ||
| Mechanics axis 1 (e.g. decreasing shering stress) | 1.27 | 0.393 | ||
| Mechanics axis 2 (e.g. wood elasticity) | 1.99 | 0.943 | ||
| Wood density | 1.25 | 0.386 | ||
| Leaf axis 1 (e.g. SLA) | −3.32 | 0.021 * | ↓ | |
| Leaf axis 2 (e.g. dentate leaves) | 1.95 | 0.828 |
The column “dir” indicates the direction of the effect, in this case a decrease (↓) with increasing axes scores. Significant differences are indicated as ** at level of <0.01 and * at the level of <0.05.
Figure 3Differences in community weighted mean traits after the ice storm.
Blue indicates a significant or marginal increase after the ice storm. Wood density and the first leaf trait axis (increasing SLA) both increased. See Appendix S2 for a detailed description of the species trait axes.