BACKGROUND: We assessed the efficacy of low-dose aripiprazole added to antidepressant therapy (ADT) in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients with inadequate response to prior ADT. METHODS: As per the sequential parallel comparison design, 225 MDD subjects were randomized to adjunctive treatment with aripiprazole 2 mg/day or placebo across two 30-day phases, with a 2:3:3 randomization ratio to drug/drug (aripiprazole 2 mg/day in phase 1; 5 mg/day in phase 2), placebo/placebo (placebo in both phases), and placebo/drug (placebo in phase 1; aripiprazole 2 mg/day in phase 2). Eligible subjects were patients whose MDD was independently deemed 'valid' with SAFER criteria. Subjects had been receiving ADT for ≥8 weeks, and had inadequate response to ≥1 and <4 adequate ADTs in the current episode, as defined by the Antidepressant Treatment Response Questionnaire. RESULTS: The pooled, weighted response difference between aripiprazole 2 mg/day and placebo in the two phases was 5.6% (p = 0.18; NS). The aripiprazole 2 mg/day-placebo difference on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale pooled across the two phases was -1.51 (p = 0.065; NS). Other secondary endpoint analyses showed nonsignificant pooled differences favoring aripiprazole over placebo. Of the 225 randomized subjects in phase 1, 2 dropped out in both arms, while in phase 2, of 138 phase 1 placebo nonresponders, 9 dropped out onaripiprazole and 5 on placebo. There were only minimal differences in adverse event rates between treatments, except for constipation, weight gain, and dry mouth, more common on aripiprazole. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides clear support for the tolerability of low-dose aripiprazole as an ADT-augmenting agent, with marginal efficacy.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: We assessed the efficacy of low-dose aripiprazole added to antidepressant therapy (ADT) in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients with inadequate response to prior ADT. METHODS: As per the sequential parallel comparison design, 225 MDD subjects were randomized to adjunctive treatment with aripiprazole 2 mg/day or placebo across two 30-day phases, with a 2:3:3 randomization ratio to drug/drug (aripiprazole 2 mg/day in phase 1; 5 mg/day in phase 2), placebo/placebo (placebo in both phases), and placebo/drug (placebo in phase 1; aripiprazole 2 mg/day in phase 2). Eligible subjects were patients whose MDD was independently deemed 'valid' with SAFER criteria. Subjects had been receiving ADT for ≥8 weeks, and had inadequate response to ≥1 and <4 adequate ADTs in the current episode, as defined by the Antidepressant Treatment Response Questionnaire. RESULTS: The pooled, weighted response difference between aripiprazole 2 mg/day and placebo in the two phases was 5.6% (p = 0.18; NS). The aripiprazole 2 mg/day-placebo difference on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale pooled across the two phases was -1.51 (p = 0.065; NS). Other secondary endpoint analyses showed nonsignificant pooled differences favoring aripiprazole over placebo. Of the 225 randomized subjects in phase 1, 2 dropped out in both arms, while in phase 2, of 138 phase 1 placebo nonresponders, 9 dropped out on aripiprazole and 5 on placebo. There were only minimal differences in adverse event rates between treatments, except for constipation, weight gain, and dry mouth, more common on aripiprazole. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides clear support for the tolerability of low-dose aripiprazole as an ADT-augmenting agent, with marginal efficacy.
Authors: Hitoshi Sakurai; Christina Dording; Albert Yeung; Simmie Foster; Felipe Jain; Trina Chang; Nhi-Ha Trinh; Richard Bernard; Sean Boyden; Syed Z Iqbal; Samuel T Wilkinson; Sanjay J Mathew; David Mischoulon; Maurizio Fava; Cristina Cusin Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Laura E Dichtel; Linda L Carpenter; Maren Nyer; David Mischoulon; Allison Kimball; Thilo Deckersbach; Darin D Dougherty; David A Schoenfeld; Lauren Fisher; Cristina Cusin; Christina Dording; Nhi-Ha Trinh; Paola Pedrelli; Albert Yeung; Amy Farabaugh; George I Papakostas; Trina Chang; Benjamin G Shapero; Justin Chen; Paolo Cassano; Emily M Hahn; Elizabeth M Rao; Roscoe O Brady; Ravinder J Singh; Audrey R Tyrka; Lawrence H Price; Maurizio Fava; Karen K Miller Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2020-07-14 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Rachael W Taylor; Lindsey Marwood; Emanuella Oprea; Valeria DeAngel; Sarah Mather; Beatrice Valentini; Roland Zahn; Allan H Young; Anthony J Cleare Journal: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2020-12-03 Impact factor: 5.176
Authors: Chadi G Abdallah; Mark J Niciu; Lisa R Fenton; Madonna K Fasula; Lihong Jiang; Anne Black; Douglas L Rothman; Graeme F Mason; Gerard Sanacora Journal: Psychother Psychosom Date: 2014-08-06 Impact factor: 17.659
Authors: Ella J Daly; Jaskaran B Singh; Maggie Fedgchin; Kimberly Cooper; Pilar Lim; Richard C Shelton; Michael E Thase; Andrew Winokur; Luc Van Nueten; Husseini Manji; Wayne C Drevets Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 21.596