Literature DB >> 25894814

Adaptive speech enhancement using directional microphone in a 4-T MRI scanner.

Guohua Sun1, Mingfeng Li1, Brent W Rudd1, Teik C Lim1, Jeffrey Osterhage2, Elizabeth M Fugate2, Jing-Huei Lee3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed adaptive speech enhancement (ASE) system for the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) environment to reduce the loud scanning noise without disrupting the communication between patients and MRI operators.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The developed system employed the idea of differential directional microphones for measuring and distinguishing the speech signals and MRI acoustic noises simultaneously. Two-stage adaptive filters with normalized least mean square algorithms were adopted. Two common MRI scanning sequences, echo planar imaging (EPI) and gradient echo multi-slice (GEMS), were tested using a 4T MRI scanner.
RESULTS: A total of 1.4 and 3.3 dB speech enhancements quantified by the cepstral distance assessment were achieved for the speech signal contaminated with the EPI and GEMS noises, respectively. The speech signal was noticeably recovered, and a clear speech waveform was observed after treated with the ASE system. Furthermore, a non-adaptive post-processing approach [i.e. simply using spectral subtraction (SS) technique] was also adopted to process the abovementioned results. Additional reductions were achieved for the non-coherent MRI acoustic noises.
CONCLUSION: The results showed that combining the proposed ASE system along with the SS approach has a great potential for treating MRI acoustic noise to guarantee an effective communication from patient to MRI operators.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active noise control; Adaptive speech enhancement; MRI acoustics; Noise; Sound

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25894814     DOI: 10.1007/s10334-015-0485-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  12 in total

1.  Acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M E Ravicz; J R Melcher; N Y Kiang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Magnetic resonance diagnostic device; panel recommendation and report on petitions for magnetic resonance reclassification and codification of reclassification--FDA. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1989-02-01

3.  In situ active control of noise in a 4 T MRI scanner.

Authors:  Mingfeng Li; Brent Rudd; Teik C Lim; Jing-Huei Lee
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Simulation study on active noise control for a 4-T MRI scanner.

Authors:  Mingfeng Li; Teik C Lim; Jing-Huei Lee
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Acoustic noise characteristics of a 4 Telsa MRI scanner.

Authors:  Shashikant R More; Teik C Lim; Mingfeng Li; Christy K Holland; Suzanne E Boyce; Jing-Huei Lee
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Acoustic, psychophysical, and neuroimaging measurements of the effectiveness of active cancellation during auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Deborah A Hall; John Chambers; Michael A Akeroyd; John R Foster; Ron Coxon; Alan R Palmer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A multichannel speech enhancement method for functional MRI systems using a distributed microphone array.

Authors:  Ali A Milani; Govind Kannan; Issa M S Panahi; Richard Briggs
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

8.  Integrated speech enhancement for functional MRI environment.

Authors:  Nishank Pathak; Ali A Milani; Issa Panahi; Richard Briggs
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

9.  Real time speech enhancement for the noisy MRI environment.

Authors:  Nishank Pathak; Issa Panahi; P Devineni; Richard Briggs
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

10.  Objective and subjective evaluation of adaptive speech enhancement methods for functional MRI.

Authors:  Venkat R Ramachandran; Issa M S Panahi; Ali A Milani
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  1 in total

1.  Vibration and Noise in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Vocal Tract: Differences between Whole-Body and Open-Air Devices.

Authors:  Jiří Přibil; Anna Přibilová; Ivan Frollo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.576

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.