Wietske van der Zwaag1, João Jorge2,3, Denis Butticaz2, Rolf Gruetter2,4. 1. Centre d'Imagerie Biomédicale (CIBM), Station 6, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. Wietske.vanderzwaag@epfl.ch. 2. Centre d'Imagerie Biomédicale (CIBM), Station 6, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. 3. Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, Portugal. 4. Department of Radiology, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare physiological noise contributions in cerebellar and cerebral regions of interest in high-resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data acquired at 7T, to estimate the need for physiological noise removal in cerebellar fMRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Signal fluctuations in high resolution (1 mm isotropic) 7T fMRI data were attributed to one of the following categories: task-induced BOLD changes, slow drift, signal changes correlated with the cardiac and respiratory cycles, signal changes related to the cardiac rate and respiratory volume per unit of time or other. [Formula: see text] values for all categories were compared across regions of interest. RESULTS: In this high-resolution data, signal fluctuations related to the phase of the cardiac cycle and cardiac rate were shown to be significant, but comparable between cerebellar and cerebral regions of interest. However, respiratory related signal fluctuations were increased in the cerebellar regions, with explained variances that were up to 80 % higher than for the primary motor cortex region. CONCLUSION: Even at a millimetre spatial resolution, significant correlations with both cardiac and respiratory RETROICOR components were found in all healthy volunteer data. Therefore, physiological noise correction is highly likely to improve the temporal signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for cerebellar fMRI at 7T, even at high spatial resolution.
OBJECTIVES: To compare physiological noise contributions in cerebellar and cerebral regions of interest in high-resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data acquired at 7T, to estimate the need for physiological noise removal in cerebellar fMRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Signal fluctuations in high resolution (1 mm isotropic) 7T fMRI data were attributed to one of the following categories: task-induced BOLD changes, slow drift, signal changes correlated with the cardiac and respiratory cycles, signal changes related to the cardiac rate and respiratory volume per unit of time or other. [Formula: see text] values for all categories were compared across regions of interest. RESULTS: In this high-resolution data, signal fluctuations related to the phase of the cardiac cycle and cardiac rate were shown to be significant, but comparable between cerebellar and cerebral regions of interest. However, respiratory related signal fluctuations were increased in the cerebellar regions, with explained variances that were up to 80 % higher than for the primary motor cortex region. CONCLUSION: Even at a millimetre spatial resolution, significant correlations with both cardiac and respiratory RETROICOR components were found in all healthy volunteer data. Therefore, physiological noise correction is highly likely to improve the temporal signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for cerebellar fMRI at 7T, even at high spatial resolution.
Entities:
Keywords:
3D-EPI; Cerebellum; Magnetic resonance imaging; Noise; Resolution
Authors: E Yacoub; A Shmuel; J Pfeuffer; P F Van De Moortele; G Adriany; P Andersen; J T Vaughan; H Merkle; K Ugurbil; X Hu Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: José P Marques; Wietske van der Zwaag; Cristina Granziera; Gunnar Krueger; Rolf Gruetter Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: C Triantafyllou; R D Hoge; G Krueger; C J Wiggins; A Potthast; G C Wiggins; L L Wald Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2005-05-15 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Mayur Narsude; Wietske van der Zwaag; Tobias Kober; Rolf Gruetter; José P Marques Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-10-17 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Michael Küper; Meret J S Wünnemann; Markus Thürling; Roxana M Stefanescu; Stefan Maderwald; Hans G Elles; Sophia Göricke; Mark E Ladd; Dagmar Timmann Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2013-04-09 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Gilles de Hollander; Max C Keuken; Wietske van der Zwaag; Birte U Forstmann; Robert Trampel Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2017-03-27 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Reiko Ashida; Nadia L Cerminara; Richard J Edwards; Richard Apps; Jonathan C W Brooks Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Nikos Priovoulos; Thomas Roos; Özlem Ipek; Ettore F Meliado; Richard O Nkrumah; Dennis W J Klomp; Wietske van der Zwaag Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2021-07-06 Impact factor: 4.044