Literature DB >> 25893611

Comparison of patient quality of life scores and satisfaction after common orthopedic surgical interventions.

Jason B T Lim1, Andrew C C Chou, William Yeo, Ngai Nung Lo, Shi-Lu Chia, Pak Lin Chin, Darren K J Tay, Seng Jin Yeo.   

Abstract

Patient quality of life scores are commonly used to assess patient-reported satisfaction following orthopedic interventions. Our main aim was to review the satisfaction scores of four common orthopedic interventions in our tertiary institution, primary hallux valgus (HV) corrective surgery, primary single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data on patients who underwent four different types of orthopedic surgeries using the SF-36 score and two questions adopted from North American Spine Society Questionnaire. The database of a tertiary hospital between January 2007 and December 2009 was reviewed. There were 3488, 374, 184 and 73 patients who underwent TKA, THA, TLIF and HV surgery, respectively. Patients who underwent primary TLIF, TKA and THA had significant degree of improvement in all aspects of SF-36 scores at 6 months and 2 years of follow-up (p < 0.001). Postoperatively at 2 years, the most satisfied postoperative patients were those who underwent THA (91.9 %), followed by TKA (90.5 %), TLIF (86.1 %) and HV (77.4 %). This study shows a significant degree of postoperative improvement in terms of SF-36 scores for common orthopedic interventions in particular to primary TKA, THA and TLIF at 6 months and 2 years of follow-up. With a significant degree of improvement in SF-36 scores postoperatively, this also translated into patient satisfaction and meeting their expectations of surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25893611     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-015-1635-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  25 in total

1.  Patients' satisfaction with provided care/information and expectations on clinical outcome after lumbar disc herniation surgery.

Authors:  Katarina Rönnberg; Bengt Lind; Björn Zoëga; Klas Halldin; Martin Gellerstedt; Helena Brisby
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Patient expectations of arthroplasty of the hip and knee.

Authors:  C E H Scott; K E Bugler; N D Clement; D MacDonald; C R Howie; L C Biant
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-07

3.  Patients' expectations and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  C A Mancuso; E A Salvati; N A Johanson; M G Peterson; M E Charlson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Relationship between preoperative expectations, satisfaction, and functional outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar and cervical spine surgery: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Alexandra Soroceanu; Alexander Ching; William Abdu; Kevin McGuire
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Two-year outcomes of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Seng Yew Poh; Wai Mun Yue; Li-Tat John Chen; Chang-Ming Guo; William Yeo; Seang-Beng Tan
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.118

6.  Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of 1217 patients.

Authors:  C E H Scott; C R Howie; D MacDonald; L C Biant
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-09

Review 7.  Patient satisfaction: Implications and predictors of success.

Authors:  Eric D Shirley; James O Sanders
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Causes and predictors of patient's dissatisfaction after uncomplicated total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tae Kyun Kim; Chong Bum Chang; Yeon Gwi Kang; Sung Ju Kim; Sang Cheol Seong
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Do clinical presentation and pre-operative quality of life predict satisfaction with care after total hip or knee replacement?

Authors:  C Baumann; A C Rat; G Osnowycz; D Mainard; J P Delagoutte; C Cuny; F Guillemin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-03

10.  What is a good patient reported outcome after total hip replacement?

Authors:  N K Arden; A Kiran; A Judge; L C Biant; M K Javaid; D W Murray; A J Carr; C Cooper; R E Field
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 6.576

View more
  14 in total

1.  The Economic Impact of Orthopaedics in Missouri.

Authors:  Abhishek Kantamneni; Akin Cil; Brian Treece; Mark Bernhardt
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug

2.  EUROSPINE 2017 FULL PAPER AWARD: Time to remove our rose-tinted spectacles: a candid appraisal of the relative success of surgery in over 4500 patients with degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine, hip or knee.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Franco M Impellizzeri; Michael Leunig; Dezsö Jeszenszy; Hans-Jürgen Becker; Daniel Haschtmann; Stefan Preiss; Tamas F Fekete
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Cognitive-behavioral therapy improves the quality of life of patients with acromegaly.

Authors:  Lia Silvia Kunzler; Luciana Ansaneli Naves; Luiz Augusto Casulari
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.107

4.  CORR Insights®: No Difference in Functional, Radiographic, and Survivorship Outcomes Between Direct Anterior or Posterior Approach THA: 5-Year Results of a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Mark J Spangehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Patients' Expectations Impact Their Satisfaction following Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Audrey Neuprez; Jean-Pierre Delcour; Firouzeh Fatemi; Philippe Gillet; Jean-Michel Crielaard; Olivier Bruyère; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Clinical Outcomes Evaluation of Combined Valgus and Chiari Osteotomy Inconsistent with Patient Satisfaction.

Authors:  Akira Hozumi; Kennichi Kidera; Ko Chiba; Takayuki Shida; Makoto Osaki
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Combined intravenous and intra-articular tranexamic acid administration in total knee arthroplasty for preventing blood loss and hyperfibrinolysis: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yi-Min Zhang; Bo Yang; Xue-Dong Sun; Zhen Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of an Exercise Program for Persons with Total Hip or Total Knee Replacement: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Giuseppe Barone; Raffaele Zinno; Erika Pinelli; Francesco Benvenuti; Laura Bragonzoni
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  A review of UHMWPE wear-induced osteolysis: the role for early detection of the immune response.

Authors:  Adrese M Kandahari; Xinlin Yang; Kevin A Laroche; Abhijit S Dighe; Dongfeng Pan; Quanjun Cui
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 13.567

10.  The influence of the number of screws and additional surgical procedures on outcome in hallux valgus treatment.

Authors:  Thorsten Jentzsch; Niklas Renner; Richard Niehaus; Jan Farei-Campagna; Marcel Deggeller; Fabrice Scheurer; Katie Palmer; Stephan H Wirth
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.